 So let me raise another difficult topic. There are, again, no shortage of them. Lots of people around the world are very much struggling for democracy, for freedom of expression. We're seeing that now very much in the streets in Hong Kong, in the midst of a very complicated US-Chinese relationship. Let me come at that from two different angles. In your book, Hard Choices, you talked about your experiences in Iran and the way in which the Green Movement took off there and that you regretted not finding a way for the United States to have a bigger voice for democracy. So you've got that going on the one hand. You want to do more. You have this big complicated US-Chinese relationship. And again, you, more than anyone knows, that the growth of China as a rising power has led to all kinds of challenges for the United States that you also write about in your book. So you've got this tug of war between your desire to support these democratic protesters in the street and the complicated US-Chinese relationship. How do you navigate that? What would you do? How do you show support and engage in the long term with the Chinese? Well, look, I think the Chinese used to understand that part of the role that the United States played in the world was to speak out for human rights and democracy. And knowing full well that there were many situations that all we could do was speak out. We weren't going to do anything else, but at least we could give a level of encouragement and support to the people who were in the streets or the people who were trying to make the changes. And in the Iran situation, going back into 2009, when there was a Green Movement uprising, we talked to all of the experts and the expats, the Iranian-Americans, everybody we think of, who said, look, we don't want the United States to speak out too much because we don't want the Iranian government to say this was a US-inspired demonstration because it wasn't. I mean, we're demonstrating because we want more freedom. So we didn't go as far as we might ordinarily have, but we use technology in those days. We knew that a lot of the demonstrations were being planned on Facebook, for example, and Facebook, we found out, was going to have an outage for some kind of mechanical, technical problem, and we begged them to keep it on so people could still meet. So we tried to do what we could, but we, I think, maybe listened too thoughtfully to the people who said, don't be too out front. But the Iranians, like the Chinese, would expect us to say, you know what? We believe in human dignity. We believe in the right of every person to have a certain equality and access to justice and be part of a political environment in which they get to choose their leaders. So when it comes to Hong Kong, I personally think it would not cause some huge breach if the United States government were saying what they should say, which is that, you know, people have a right to demonstrate peacefully and we expect the Chinese government to avoid, you know, military action against their own people in the streets of Hong Kong and make sure we deliver that message in a couple of different ways. Instead, we hear that the president has a call with Xi Jinping and he basically says, I'm not gonna say anything about Hong Kong. And if you looked at pictures of the demonstrations in Hong Kong, there were lots of American flags. There were lots of statues of liberty. People were carrying quotes from Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin and George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. So certainly the predominantly young people of Hong Kong were being inspired by our own history. And I think it's a shame that we have retreated so far from speaking out. That doesn't mean, Mike, that, you know, you keep rubbing salt in the wounds or you sacrifice American interests when you are engaged in that kind of advocacy. But it does mean that when America is silent about these fundamental human rights, nobody else is gonna speak up. Nobody else has a voice loud enough to be heard.