 We've just finished a very warm and constructive meeting on the final session, and I want to report to you on the results. As you all know, I originally urged the 97th Congress to return for this session because much work remained to be done on the 1983 budget. Senator Baker, Congressman Michael, and the other GOP leaders who were here this morning have pledged that they will do everything they can to complete action on the 10 appropriation bills that are outstanding. Everyone recognizes that in working on these bills we must hold the line on spending. While the appropriation bills are among the highest priorities of this final session, we also agreed this morning that we must move forward on other fronts as well. I've asked the leaders to work with me in coming days to pass two vital pieces of legislation that will help bring a fresh boost to our economy, a highway construction bill that will help restore the nation's most important transportation arteries and stimulate several hundred thousand new jobs in the hard-hit construction and related industries, and the enterprise zone legislation that would provide a new lifeline to people who live in our inner cities. We had a good discussion of tax policies in the meeting while there continues to be interest in the possibility of accelerating the economic stimulus provided by our tax program. We agreed that our most important objective for this final session is to protect the cuts that are already in place. The third year of the tax cut that begins this July 83 and the indexing that follows in 84. Our tax program, along with the highway program, the enterprise zone initiative and our efforts to hold down spending are all essential to restoring healthy America. Looking beyond the economy, there are several other pieces of unfinished business which almost also must be addressed in this final session of the 97th Congress. The priorities I outlined to the leaders this morning included the following, the Caribbean Basin Initiative, which is so important to our relations with our neighbors to the south, and which I'll be discussing with them in the next few days, and of great importance, I'm asking that the Congress provide funding so that our MX program can begin on schedule. Then there is the Clean Air Act, Nuclear Waste Disposal, a revision of our bankruptcy laws, regulatory reform, and immigration reform, Radio Marti and the Anti-Crime Bill already passed by the Senate. In the past several days, I and others of the administration have had the opportunity to consult widely with members of the Congress on both sides of the aisle. From these conversations and from our meeting this morning, I'm convinced that there is a desire on everyone's part to get the job done in a spirit of cooperation. Economy needs it, our people deserve it, and I think all of us are prepared to answer that call. I think that you are not going to push at all for the advancement of the task, but you didn't say in so many words, was that what you're saying? No, we discussed that very thoroughly, and while as I say, there is still some interest in this, we're not going to make a push for that. We think the most important thing is to resist efforts that probably will be made to go the other way. Mr. President, you described it however as an appealing way of stimulating the economy that was about two weeks ago. What changed your mind? Well there are a number of facets to it. Among those could be what opening that whole subject up might do, but also there is a contrary one that we were aware of at the time, and that is with the deficits while I believe that's a stimulant to the economy. It's a stimulant that actually occurs down the line in little ways. And the first result in this time of high deficit would be an addition to the deficit. Mr. President, from Mr. Michael and Mr. Beggie, that it probably could not pass. Well I'll tell you what, I think maybe I'm going to let these gentlemen answer questions like that because the whole thing was that after two or three of these for you, and because I'm going to be taking off from the South Lawn very quickly on this trip and I've got some other meetings now to go to, I'm going to abandon ship here and turn it over to them. But we discussed the difficulty of getting this passed because I say there are elements up there who want to go the other way, which I think would be directly opposed to what is needed today of where to restore the economy would be to go the other way and take away that incentive. Are you talking about that? That would be one that I was not talking about. I was talking about the tax program itself. But this program, I think by the time that got into place it would ignore all the things that are happening to the economy and it would be self-defeating to have such a program as they're talking up on the hill. Let me just say this one thing this morning, as you know at 10 o'clock the economic indicators, the news on them was released again and not only are they up again for October, but they revised September and it was up more than double what the figure had been given a month ago for the economic indicators in September. But I do, and now no footing around, I do have to go and it isn't just to get away from your questions here. President, do you think you can salvage the third year? Is there any danger? Do you think the third year can be preserved? Is there a danger that it might be postponed or perhaps killed? I think it can be saved. I'm sure of it. I've got two good fellows here to save. Do you like to take some questions here? Thank you. All right. Okay. Thank you. Thank you, sir. I'm on the question of keeping a third year of the time.