 Welcome to the Knuckleheads of Liberty. The board has cut the EPA's ability to be able to do some of these power plant regulations and such that have to do with greenhouse gases and such. So this is potentially a huge blow to EPA and executive authority to push through some of these green new looking deal type of things. But what do you guys think about this? This potentially has some earth shattering stuff. I actually remember when, gosh, it was 15, 20 years ago when the Supreme Court came down and said that the EPA could regulate CO2. So that was a huge issue. So anyway, what do you guys think about this? This is probably the most monumental thing since that I would think. I'm glad to see these bureaucracies, these three letter bureaucracies being confronted by the harsh reality of the Constitution. Oh my gosh, you've got some limitation on your power after all. Oh, and your butt heard about that and the sky is falling now and we're all going to die because your three letter institution, your bureaucracy cannot do whatever they want without any kind of legislative process whatsoever. Nothing to vote on, you know, where's the people's chance to submit their support or their lack of support on these issues and where is it debated on the floor? Nowhere, it's just a bunch of very small, you know, it's just top down central planning. And so I love it when top down central planning gets pushed back from the Supreme Court and is put into their place and, okay, no, you can't do that. You can't do this, you can't do that. And so you guys on the left, if you want to completely kill our standard of living, if you want to go back to the dark ages, you want to ride a horse at a bicycle, first of all, lead from the front and sell your car. Number one, that's the first thing you need to do. The number two is that you need to put these issues up to the table in the legislature and you need to debate it and go from there and see if it'll pass, you know, instead of just relying on these top down central planners that you love, by the way, you love them all. And the fewer the better and the higher up the better for you. I mean, you would love it if the whole country was run. Of course, it'd have to be a Democrat, Democrat monarch that would just write laws. Willie and Millie. And, of course, you'd love that, you know, so it was going to make you ride a bicycle and turn in your air conditioner. No longer going to have air conditioning in the summer, Sacramento residents, sorry, that's what you want. That's what you need to have your monarch order all of us to do, because that's how you think. You know, you know, as a federal government, well, I mean, this is true at the state government level two, but as a federal government have grown larger. Too often these bureaucrats without clay statutory authorization, they have made rules and regulations that is affecting our lives. This rule and this particular ruling about the CO2 emissions, this particular rule and have far reaching consequences beyond just this particular situation. Because the bureaucracies throughout the United States, whether the state government or the federal government, they have been making rules, they have been using some vague language, you know, well, Congress nowadays, and this is the fault of Congress, they have been using these, these wordings that are vague, and it could be interpreted this way or that way. But the agencies, the bureaucratic agencies have been using this vague language to take authority upon themselves to pass rules and regulations that affect our lives without having clear mandates from Congress. And this is where it should be, this is where the rubber in the road should be, is that they're supposed to have clear authority from Congress before they pass these rules and regulations. And this is what the Supreme Court found faulty in this particular situation. They did not have clear statutory authorization to pass the rules that they are about to issue. So this thing will go beyond this particular case because there are many situations where the bureaucratic agencies are doing exactly what the EPA was trying to do in this particular case, which is to issue rules and regulations without clear mandates from Congress. So I am glad about this ruling, and I hope this is a turning of the tide where we could regain some of our liberties from these people who are not elected by me or anyone of you guys, they are not elected, but they think they could rule our lives. And even if they were elected and elected to be our rulers, that's not how we work. Exactly. We don't, it doesn't make it any better whether they're appointed by some other elected representative or they are elected by the people to rule over us. I mean, either way, in my opinion, it doesn't matter. And I know probably Leon's too, he's just bringing that up. That's also true. But yeah, maybe one of these days we'll get to the Federal Reserve. You know, in all these things, you know, the devil's sort of in the details because when Congress or legislature passes a law, if those words aren't very precise, then, you know, the executive agency may have a lot of leeway or have been given a lot of leeway in the past to do a lot of things. And, you know, it's supposed to be pretty straight and narrow, I guess. So I mean, the question is when they start interpreting too much, I guess, then it's essentially the legislature ceding their power to the executive. Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness always and forever.