 All right, Romeo, what happens if you are right? Well, just in the same way that we now regard as barbaric to saw off a limb, just because you have some problems with that limb. In the future, I think that we will regard jacking up your neurotransmitters by 20x and then waiting a couple weeks and seeing if you're better or worse will be regarded as barbaric. And so if we're right, then we have an entirely new and different paradigm for intervening on mental health. We like to refer to it as pattern pseudicles where we could have a much more precise intervention on exactly the symptoms that you're having. And it wouldn't be, you know, go away for two weeks and see what happens. That would be real-time feedback of what is this doing to your mental state? So there's some sort of an issue with the mental state and then there can be an applied pattern pseudicle and then an immediate feedback loop to make sure that it's correct. And then what would be like a most common pattern pseudicle that would be applied to a most common mental health issue? The most common is a deeper understanding of depression and anxiety, which if you look at methods to investigate how big of a quality of life impact are these conditions having. People rank something like severe depression up there with losing a limb. So it's a pretty big impact on people's lives. And what would be a pattern pseudicle application to it? Oh, that's a complicated question. Because that's what you're working on right now, figuring exactly that out. So it would maybe be a symmetrical state, like a pattern pseudicle of a symmetrical state for someone. Most likely seeing the ways in which they are currently experiencing their own environment as dissonant.