 I'm getting a lot of questions about artificial intelligence being used to create content and who owns the copyright for that? There's a saying that says all that's old is new again. It's exactly what's happening here with the issues that we're facing. In 1884, the Supreme Court had to decide whether a photographer was an author for purposes of copyright law because the camera was the first time that there's an actual machine in between an author and the work. And the camera, of course, cameras were a lot less sophisticated back then. The photographer had a lot more control and input and the court held that yes, even though this tool was used, the author is still a human being. And that's the central question that's being asked now with artificial intelligence and copyright law is the input from the human being sufficient to entitle the copyright protection to the author.