 Nepal has a very interesting history with respect to forest governance and before 1992 all rights to forest were held by the state. And so a decision was taken after a lot of debate to actually devolve rights to forest to communities. And so the law gave communities rights since 1992 about 20,000 community forest user groups have been established legally in Nepal. Women are principal beneficiaries of the rights that have gone to the forest. It turns out that women are quite often the community members who collect the non-timber forest products. So it's women who harvest the lemongrass. We have to find the right place to harvest the lemongrass. We are given the right to do so. We have to do it. We have to do it. We have to do it. We have to do it. We have to do it. We have to do it. We can't just leave the forest. The trees have to be planted there as well if you think you can reach the forest. We must do it. We have to be kind to the people of our community. We need to follow the rules and regulations. We are not allowed to do it if we are to do so. We have to follow the people of our community. We have the right to do so. We cannot come here if we do not have the right. We have the right to do so. If we do not have the right to do so, we can do it if we have the right to do so. We have a lot of cultural connections. In the society, we do not have the right to support the people's rights. But if we support the people's rights, then it is a natural right. This is a tremendous example of a community forest enterprise. And the most significant one is elephant rides that are offered to tourists. So this is proving an important source of income for the community forest user group. This is an important source of income for the community forest user group. We offer about 2 crores of income per year. We spend 25-30% of our income in conservation. And we also spend 6% of our income in education. All these examples that in the form of different enterprises that have now come up in the context of Nepal, especially in the last 10 years or so, everything has been only been possible because the communities now have been granted the right to access the resources. And that has only been possible because of the rights to evolution in the context of Nepal. What this has also facilitated is that the communities can now partner with private enterprises, for instance. They may not always have the capital or the equipment to process and produce what they want to produce. So in a way, this access to the market of community forest user groups has been facilitated by the rights that have been devolved in the form of tenure rights. I think we're finding that leadership in the community is very, very important. It's also a factor of regulation. We find that there's quite considerable differences across Nepal and how the district forestry office interacts with the community forest user groups, particularly on economic enterprises. The law is very strong. But we also have to work a lot in the field of farming. The name of the land is not even used in the name of Chinese. Even if they are all Chinese, the fruit is used in the name of Chinese. We find that their name is very strong. We have to work in some forest. In some forest, we have to be good and strong. If we have to work in some forest, we have to do what we can. If we do, we will die.