 Committee looked at our bill. They made a recommendation for change to make it clear. It's solely Where's Michelle? They're changed and I think we should adopt their change on the organ transplants So I think it's the word solely however the two committees remain at blogger jams or whatever it is over the other issue and I Pretty much told senator air. I didn't think our committee wanted to budge on the Maybe you want a budget no, no, no, I don't want to buy. Oh, okay. I thought I was defending you You would budge It's not a majority the committee then it is a majority So the issue if you find it for us in graph 4.1 Michelle for the Yeah, so if you look at draft 4.1 page for Subsection G lines 9 through 11 And I'll it didn't they Yesterday when I was in Senate helping welfare They they had thought their recommendation was gonna be for you to take both that section out So I didn't prepare any additional language I'll pass this around if you look at the top G language that on pass around that would be I think What the alternative is about adding the solely so it's just it's going with the language that you have currently in 4.1 I just have to rephrase a little bit to add in well, that's fine. I clarify that it's not the soul disqualifying Yes, okay, so I'll do it so I'll do a version 5.1 and so that's the version you can go down this morning And then the other issue we should probably take a vote on Is where where is that on the debilitating? Yeah, that is If you look at page 2 it starts section 3 starts at the bottom of page 2 It continues on to page 3 so the language that they're concerned about is in subdivision A For C which is right now The language reads a disease or medical condition or its treatment that is chronic debilitating and produces one or more of the following Intractable symptoms and you were striking that and expanding that to be Another disease Right that was the language I was recommended by the Justice Oversight Committee got three years ago And how self-emotional And that's why it's back here so Are there any conversation about this particular session Discussion Then there would be a motion to Adopt a Draft 4.1 that will be amended in draft 4.2. It'll be 5 5.1 Adopt the amendments to S16, I mean that's 2 6 Seen in 4.1 as amended which will become 5.1 Crazy I So it's three to one we'll get senator assil's vote The next question is is there a motion to report draft 5.1 favorably? As I meant 2 16 favorably as amended to draft 5.1. Yes Senator white has moved. Is there any discussion? Peggy, would you please call the roll senator nigga? No Senator wait. Yes Senator Benning. Yes, senator Sears. Yes, and senator white. Would you report this? Sure. Thank you Agreed a whole article with part of it. I will report it as if I do Okay, well, I think there's all everybody has a part of it. We don't agree right, right? That's the rule of compromise