 One of the things that maybe you should understand by the Norwegian society is that in the 70s we had a very large and active women's movement which integrated into politics very early. And I think one of the reasons why our society and maybe the Scandinavian societies looks a little bit different on family policies than a lot of other countries is that in Norway and Sweden and Denmark, women entered politics as a result of the NGO work, the women's movement work. There was much more women in politics in the 80s and we had in fact the first female prime minister. But I think we entered politics very early and because of that a lot of those issues that was looked upon as private issues in fact become political issues in Norway and they became into the political parties' agendas. And just to go back to one thing that you said because I think this is so important, of course we had a women's movement here in the 60s and 70s also, but it did not result with women immediately going into positions of political power either locally on state levels or nationally. In fact the U.S. Senate up until the early 1990s had only ever had one or two sitting female senators at any time. I mean that recently there were only one or two women in the U.S. Senate and even now we just have 20, which is one-fifth of the Senate. Why was it possible for women in Norway to immediately go from the women's movement into political life? I think it has something to do with our election system too. It must. Or money. Yeah, yeah. And of course, yes, we have a different election system and we also of course don't have all of this. Our politics are financed differently than American politics are. We are in a way governmental financed. You might react to that, but the fact that most of the political parties in Norway will get sponsored, get money from the government on the local, the regional and national level based on the percentage of the last election. So you get to run your parliamentary group, to run your local constituency group, to run your party. You get that type of financing. I think that might discuss it if it's good or bad. Some would say that it then of course always give the bigger parties more money because they did a good re-election the last time. It can firm the structures in a way. But on the other hand, you don't have to go around getting all the money to run a campaign, which I know for a lot of women feels more difficult than for men. Sort of getting money to run. The second thing I think is we have election districts that you, parties put up a list. So it's not one person who's voted in from a region or district. It will be, in my constituency, we have 16 members of parliament who are. Nearly all political parties are represented from that region. And from my party, there are now six members of parliament from that district. That means it was easier to put up more women on the lists. And it also had the effect that to get votes, you also had to appeal to women. So I think there was a... Some parties had a quota system. I think in most other parties would put up more women on the list because they said, if we don't have enough women, if we don't have enough young people on the list, we will lose some of the youth vote or we lose out on the women's vote. And so that led to a lot of women into politics.