 ब्लाद कर अगर गर थिस पार्टी का उपने इंच्च्च्रमट लिया वुन नहीं देटी दिफाूल के जब आटीगे, तो ये जिसका अपने CDS लिया होगा ये आपको पे करागोगा. याव कर बचार बगान की थी ते कफाज़ी अठाद़ देखौग, नाधर मोगल्गा ज्रीप दीखा, बप्यतिक हैई, लगाब और नेपी नहीं ते के लगी प्यगगे ऱा, याने वंलन देखा, याव उंगाअ कर टादा कर जो को कल लग करा लिए सेशौल हैं, आद दीख तो उसके लिये आप चीडियस लें तो दीस आप दील उसर्ट और जीक लिए बिनत्रिऩर सको देखाईज। तो आसल में लिए ने को आईज, नी को रिस्ख आ और आपना ये रिस्ट कवर करना चारही हैं if the borrower default the proceeds from the contract balance of a with the defaulted debt, in the absence of CDS a bank may sell the loan to another bank or finance so basically if the CDS is not there then there is a movement of loans, so basically CDS supports that if there is a situation like this then you are benefitted from the company which is giving the protection that if it is defaulted then it will compensate you risks of CDS one of the risk of CDS is that buyer may default on the contract thereby denying the seller the expected revenue the seller transfers the CDS to another party as a form of protection against this but it may lead to default that means that the participant of CDS is so strong that they can default then there is a minor default protection issue which is the counter party type risk but normally because there are big institutes then this risk is less but still it can be there because the situation can worse for anyone where the original buyer drops out the agreement the seller may force to sell a new CDS to third party to recope the initial investment however new CDS may sell at lower price than original CDS leading to a loss because it is all about instrument writing and instrument buying so the default element risk is still there but in its isolation or in its journal term it is a very good tool for protection and safeguards from the risk of default from the investment