 I just want to know, with the whole situation in Ukraine, how is this going to play out in the short run and in the long run? The immediate question is, of course, Crimea. I imagine that the referendum will be, if necessary, arranged so as to go for joining Russia. Whether the Kremlin will actually agree to annexation at this stage is not entirely clear because, of course, Russia has much bigger agendas and interests in Ukraine. I think what is certain is that, in effect, Crimea is now part of Russia and will remain so. And since nobody is in a position to fight to kick Russia out, the world will de facto, if not de jure, accept this as it has accepted similar things before. We should remember, of course, that the Turkish invasion of northern Cyprus did not even lead to Turkey being suspended from NATO, and people from northern Cyprus can now travel to Britain and America on northern Cypriot passports. So this is not unprecedented. Of course, when it comes to the future of Ukraine as a whole, this is a vastly bigger question that will go on indefinitely. This is now a historical question for the foreseeable future. The first major question of that is whether it will be possible to hold legitimate elections in Ukraine, or whether the conflicting parties simply cannot agree on them, at which point you could still have elections, but they will produce a result which will not be accepted by much of the population. And that, of course, is the next question as to whether there is actually violence within Ukraine between forces loyal to the new government and forces opposed to it and or forces looking to Moscow for support. That is the most dangerous question of all because, of course, militia wars of this kind, as one saw before in Satocetia, but in other parts of the world as well previously, can lead to war between the two states. And you mentioned about an international crisis. What is the international community doing in this situation, or what are the options available to the international community? As on a considerable number of occasions before, what this crisis has demonstrated is that there is no international community. International community has been used in Western discourse for either everything the West agrees on, and then it gets narrower, everything NATO agrees on, some members of NATO agree on, America and Britain agree on, or actually an American parlance very often just what America agrees on, that is the international community, it isn't. What I think needs to be stated very strongly is that while the West has not behaved formally illegally in Ukraine, by in effect giving support and turning a blind eye in its public language to what are some extremely ugly chauvinist forces in Kiev, notably the Tsvaboda party and the Pravi sector, neo-fascists, the West has behaved in my view extremely irresponsibly, especially remembering that there was a resolution of the European Union parliament two years ago, which denounced Tsvaboda for extreme nationalism, chauvinism, xenophobia and antisemitism, and called on other Ukrainian parties not to cooperate with it. Now we find ourselves in a situation where not just are we giving massive support to this government with no public conditions at all, whatever the private conditions are being set, but you have American propaganda and British propaganda to some extent as well, declaring that contrary, as I say to what the European parliament itself declared, Tsvaboda is not in fact an extreme nationalist party. Now you know the Russians have been lying about the immediate physical threat to Russians in Ukraine and especially in Crimea, they have been grossly exaggerating that threat, but America has matched that with a lie of its own about its own allies. Now this is extremely dangerous because the most worrying thing in Ukraine is not the actions of the Russian army at present, nor indeed is it the actions of the Ukrainian government as such at present. It is that as happened previously in the Caucasus, in the Balkans and elsewhere, rival militias on both sides will clash with each other and that this will then draw in the armed forces on opposing sides. At that point you have a Ukrainian civil war and potentially of course full-scale Russian military intervention. That would be a world historical crisis and that would do disastrous damage to the world economy. So there is great need for restraint on both sides. We are correct to urge such restraint on the Russians. It is also essential that we urge restraint on some of our own allies in Kiev as well.