 Moj tudi o koncerni ljudi, kaj je ljudi, kaj je z njega izgleda v nekaj in mediteranji teritori, in v nekaj in Apulijanj regioni. To je in area, kaj je izgleda, da je več strana, da je vse, na archeologičnih stranji, vse, vse, vse, vse, vse, vse, vse, vse. spravit. Svoj, da se je zelo, prejno zelo, nezajte, da je zelo, pa dobar je. Je to neselete, da je začelite, da je bilo zelo, da je začelite, da nezajte, da je začelite, načo bi se navočilo, da je začelite, načo bi se navočilo, da je začelite, načo bi se navočilo, kaj je zelo vseh, košnje, in zelo vzelo na zelo. To je zelo kronologija, kronokulturija, zelo vzelo na zelo, na zelo. To je nasična, nasična analizija. Zanimamo, da se zelo vzelo na zelo, kaj je izgledaj z analizivnjih C-14 vzgledaj. Vzgledajte vzgledaj na vzgledaj z intensitivnjih vzgledaj. Vzgledaj je analizis in vzgledaj je vzgledaj vzgledaj vzgledaj vzgledaj. Tis je vzgledaj, vzgledaj je o potu vzgledaj, vzglubno vzgleda, in vzglubno vzglubno vzglubno vzglubno vzglubno vzglubno vzglubno vzglubno vzglubno. Vzglubno vzglubno in z vison otsle, tako prihodno dne joč javmi vzglubno. In podbullatvo polymer sadil me, da je svoja nik Ukrainec vzglubna, w počkej isprednjih. V12 trajbenje se zahvala v nekaj koliki se zapravila tvoje bronzez in zahvala. Caj našli pomembnoji prevzajamo drugi domar, najporni drugi počke in u kosta v počkej in subcoasta v recyclede In smo zelo pravno tačno videli svojo trnav kakosti v terbega pravna. Pa z njega neseljne trnave, kako se je zelo včasno zelo. Tukaj to je všehoga databasea v predstavili side, kako smo opetili o 162 side, okologijne side, skavajte in zbičke side. To je dalačne zelo, da smo vse zelo, za vse rekočenje, zelo, da je relacija in odličenja lanskej, lanskoj, in ljudi vse začelje. V prvej sej, veliko na veče, smo vseznačenje zelo, zelo, odličenja, na kosta in na kosta. V nekaj vzelo smo na prevalenju z vsej in na kostalj sej. V sej na medijo sej na kostalj sej in na kostalj okupacije. Vzelo smo vzelo vzelo v monofreziji in plurifeziji okupacije. Tentative is to reconstruct the long duration of the occupation in the same area. This is the schema for the first phase. During the second phase we see a change. A change in the number of the sites, and an augmentation in the rise of sub-costal occupation. Also we have a reduction of monofaze sites. During the third phase we have a big, strong change in the sub-costal occupation. We have a differentiation of coastal and inland occupation and reduction of sub-costal sites. And with an augmentation of monofaze sites. What is our interpretation of this distribution of sites and the frequencies of this occupation. We have a strong occupation during the middle phase. We have a strong intensity of occupation in the region during the second phase. We have a change of landscape dynamics, landscape distribution of the sites during the second phase, probably connected to changes in land use. And we have a trend that we see from the second to third phase. What we have above land cover and land in database. These data are already published. This is our analysis based on archeobotanical data. We use a chart called analysis of land called reconstruction. And we use a circle analysis for the land use reconstruction. This is our total database, 40,000 plant material. And we made, we tried to reconstruct also the seasonal changes in the crop production. For example, using the presence of millet with a brief period of growing, for us it's connected to a change in rainfall region. Or using the other type of crops to reconstruct changes in agricultural system. This is our database for the land cover. We use polar analysis, isotopical analysis from different coasts in Adriatic Sea and Ionian area. We use, for example, isotopical analysis from sedrens in coasts from Adriatic area. And isotopical analysis, delta potency in the archeobotanical material to percept the direct changes in the climate and probably in rainfall region directly on the sides. But these are data that we know in general for the Mediterranean area. Our tentative is to connect the different type of data. This is the land cover reconstructed from the chart called analysis. For example, we see a particular trend in oaks present. From the early phase we have a drastic reduction in mesophilus oaks. We speak about Mediterranean area so there are very important changes in oaks type, oaks species. We have a change in mesophilus oaks, a reduction probably connected to climatic change and dryness in environments. But in the third phase, for example, we have augmentation. This is no climatic, this is anthropic. There is a change in catchment area because in this moment we have implementation of sub-coastal site, the use of sub-coastal site in environments. Particular trend you can see in this area, that is connected to climate and also to the exploitation of the state. We compare our data from archaeological context with Poland analysis in the region. And this is our reconstruction for the crop. For example, we have the classical barley and wheat consumption during the early Bronze Age, connected with the typical Mediterranean area from the Neolithic just to know that we have the same trend. But during the Middle Bronze Age we have augmentation, for example, of pulses, other cereals and the use of trifles. It is connected to the use of a new environment, the sub-coastal environment. This trend is marked in the third phase when the use of trifles is a strategy to survive, to change this environment but also to change this in catchment area in different organization of the site of the territory. You can see the peaks during the Middle Bronze Age, the changes in dynamics in tropical occupation and the changes in crop region. All the data in this phase for us are straight and strong connected. Thank you very much.