 I'd like to call the City of Columbia Planning Commission for May 12th in the session. Welcome to Planning Commission members, staff, and guests. We ask for your patience during this meeting. Multiple staff members are here today. Those include Lucinda Statler, Planning Administrator, Hope Hastie, Zoning Administrator, Jonathan Chambers, Land Development Administrator, and Andrew Livinggood, Annexation Coordinator. If you're watching the meeting via City TV, you will see live images or still images of Planning Commission members and the administrator. However, images of the applicant and the public will not be visible. Today, public participation will be heard here, in person, or via email by those watching on City TV. When participating, please provide your name for documentation purposes. The public may stream the meetings through City TV accessed at www.youtube.com slash user slash Columbia SC government. The public may submit letters and statements via email to cocboardmeeting at columbiasc.gov leading up to and or during the meeting as this account will be monitored during the meetings. Emails and letters sent during the meeting will be read into the record. Emails and letters received prior to the meeting have been forwarded to the Commission. The public may participate via phone. You may call 855-925-2801. When prompted, please enter the meeting code 2227. If you are here today to speak about a case, you must speak up when the chairperson calls for public comment. Now I'll call the roll. Mr. Cohn, Ms. Davis, Mr. Harp, Ms. Thomas. Here. Mr. Tupper, Mr. Frost. Here. We have a quorum. I'll give a brief meeting overview and format applicants with requests before the Planning Commission are allotted a presentation time of 10 minutes. This time should include but is not limited to an overview of the project, case history, and any pertinent meetings held regarding the request. This time also includes all persons presenting information on behalf of the applicants such as attorneys, engineers, and architects. This time limit does not include any questions asked by Planning Commission or staff regarding requests. Members of the general public are given the opportunity to address their concerns and intervals of two minutes. Applicants may have five minutes to respond. The administrator has a timer and will make presenters aware of when their time has expired. The Planning Commission reserves the right to amend these procedures on a case-by-case basis. Are there any changes to the agenda? There is one change to the agenda since publication. Case number 11, under future land use map amendment and zoning map amendment for pending annexation, which is annex dash 2021 dash 0024 20.54 acres on the east side of Elmgren Street has been deferred. Other than that, the agenda stands. Thank you. The Planning Commission uses the consent agenda to approve noncontroversial or routine matters by single motion and vote. Examples of such items include approval of site plans, annexations, and street names. If a member of the Planning Commission or the general public wants to discuss an item on the consent agenda, you must, I repeat, again, you must speak up after the consent agenda is read. Then that particular item is removed from the consent agenda and considered during the meeting. The Planning Commission then approves the remaining consent agenda items. The first item on the consent agenda is to approve the April 14, 2022 minutes. The second item is annex dash 2022 dash 0011 3428 Park Street request to annex the property and assign a land use classification of urban core residential small lot and assigned zoning of residential mixed district RM two and historic preservation overlay district at the time of annexation. The property is currently classified as mixed residential high density and zoned RM HD by Richland County. Is there anyone present or watching via city TV that would like to speak about annex dash 2022 dash 0011 3428 Park Street? The next case case number three is annex dash 2022 dash 0012 12.59 acres shop road extension request to annex the property and assign an interim land use classification of industrial and assign interim zoning of light industrial district at the time of annexation. The property is currently classified as economic development center corridor and zoned M one by Richland County. Is there anyone in the public or watching via city TV that would like to speak about annex 2022 dash 0012 12.59 acres shop road extension? None. Case for annex dash 2022 dash 0013 83 25 old Percival Road request to annex the property and assign an interim land use classification of urban edge residential small lot and assign interim zoning of residential mix district at the time of annexation. The property is currently classified as neighborhood medium density and zoned RM HD by Richland County. Is there anyone that would like to speak from the public or city TV regarding annex 2022 dash 0013 83 25 old Percival Road? Hearing none. Case five is under site plan review. This is S plan dash 2022 dash 007 567 Spears Creek Church Road request site plan approval for the construction of two private roads by Interstate Associates LLC. The properties are zoned PD plan development within the Wood Creek Farms and development and is there anybody from the public or watching via city TV that would like to speak on S plan 2022 dash 007 567 Spears Creek Church Road? Seeing none. Case number six is a zoning text amendment. This is TA dash 2022 dash 002 to amend chapter 17 appendix D historic sub district boundaries request to add TMS number 09107 dash 13 dash 01 also known as 3428 Park Street to chapter 17 appendix D historic sub district boundaries in the Earlwood protection area area a at the time of the properties annexation. Is there anyone from the public or watching via city TV that would like to speak on case number six TA dash 2022 dash 002 amend chapter 17 appendix D historic sub district boundaries? Seeing none. Case number seven land use map amendment dash 2022 dash 001 1.229 acre portion of 181 Newland Road request to confirm the future land use classification of urban edge community activity center one. The property is currently assigned interim future land use classification of urban edge community activity center one. And is there anyone here from the public or watching via city TV? I would like to speak on case number seven. 2022 dash 001 1.229 acre portion of 181 Newland Road. Seeing none. Case number eight is a land use map amendment. Luma dash 2022 dash 002 28.24 acres on the east side of riding Grove Road and 0.07 acre on the southeast side of riding Grove Road. This is a request to confirm the future land use classification of urban edge residential lot. You are to the property is currently assigned interim future land use classification of you are to is there anyone here from the public or watching via city TV that would like to speak on case number eight Luma dash 2022 dash 002 28.24 acres east side riding Grove Road and 0.07 acres southeast side riding Grove Road. Hearing none. Case number nine. This is under the zoning map amendment confirmation ZMA dash 2022 dash 007 1.229 acre portion of 181 Newland Road request to confirm the zoning of light industrial. The property currently has an interim zoning of light industrial. Is there anyone here that would from the public or watching via city TV that would like to speak on case number nine ZMA dash 2022 dash 0097 1.229 acre portion of 181 Newland Road hearing none. And case number 10 is ZMA dash 2022 dash 008 28.24 acres on the east side of riding Grove Road 0.07 acre on the southeast side of riding Grove Road request to confirm the zoning of plan development district a portion within the floodplain overlay district. The property currently has an interim zoning of plan development district a portion of which is within the floodplain overlay district. Is there anyone here in person or watching via city TV that would like to speak of on case number 10 ZMA dash 2022 dash 0008 28.24 acres east side riding Grove Road and 0.07 acres southeast side of riding Grove Road hearing none. And I haven't seen anything come through on the emails. I have any callers. Thank you. Listen to Yes. I need to refuse on full consent. Okay. Thanks. We'll make make note of that. Is there anyone from planning commission that would like any item from the consent agenda removed. Hearing none. Are we going to ask again if there's anybody from the public. I guess we should probably go through the. Is there anyone from the public that would like to see any of the items read through the consent agenda removed. We asked each on on each case and hearing none. Mr Harris has recused himself at this time. I'll entertain a motion. Mr. Chair, I would like to us for Mr. Harris to recuse itself. Harris has recused himself. So I'll take a motion on the voting of the consent agenda. Mr. Chair, I move that we accept the consent agenda items as presented. Say again. I move that we accept the consent agenda items as presented. Got a motion to accept as presented. Can I get a second? Second. Got a motion in a set in a second. All in favor signify by saying aye. Any opposed say no. The ayes have it. The consent agenda is approved. Planning commission will now move forward with those items on the regular agenda. We will use the following outline for regular agenda items. The administrator will introduce the case. The applicant will have 10 minutes to make a presentation. Planning commission may ask questions. The public will be allowed to participate via email or in person. Planning commission may ask additional questions of the applicant. And then we'll have action by the planning commission. So the remaining case on the regular agenda is case number 12. This is a zoning map amendment ZMA dash 2022 dash 006 5609 Barrow Road. This is a request to rezone the property from community activity center corridor district to general commercial district. This one the staff recommendation is denial. This was a based on the proposed use of the property which is going to be for the selling of cars which is not allowed in the community activity center corridor district. And we do have a master plan that covers this area which is the villages of North Columbia master plan. So it was really not consistent with with the plan which is where the zoning and the land use classification came from. But I do believe the applicant is here and wanted to make a presentation. Okay. Yeah. If the applicant is present and would like to present to discuss. Sure. Good evening. My name is John Sims. Yeah we put in a request for use car like so use vehicles block down the street is the county. It's already a used car like there right beside us is what right beside it is a trucking company 18 willers dump trucks. I didn't know it was it actually knows actually in the city. I thought it was the county. So that's why we're here to request for yes sir. Understood. Okay. Thank you. Any any questions from planning commission to the applicant. Are you actively selling cars there now. No. Okay. No sir. What is the current use of the land. It's currently being used a restaurant. Right. Makes this a three suite building a restaurant. Wash God does wash and dryers appliances and units is actually a beauty salon but it's currently empty right now. So. Okay. Any additional actually there's no other residence homes or anything around it. Okay. The church across the street from it but down the street from next door to the church the tire tire company well they do use tires so it's like already already like a commercial area already you know. Thank you sir. Any I've got any additional questions. So was this is the correct me if I'm wrong. So there was a zoning in the county on it but it's currently in the city literally not even a block in the city line down the street is a call out there now. So you have a question. So the car lot that's a block away is that considered city or county. That's county I think. Right. County. Right next door to this property is a Rod's 18 Willers dump trucks. Accounting shop and all that's right next door to. You can see on the aerial there. Yeah. Yeah. You can see the use has adopted the city has adopted the North Columbia master plan. Yes sir there's a there's some excerpts in your write up about the master plan but basically it was a plan that was adopted by the city. In 2005 and it looked at a large area of the North Columbia area and had some recommendations for land use and transportation improvements. It had some catalyst projects recommended and this is very close to what was classified as an activity node and so this area was classified to be a mixed use land use recommended land use and zoning and so that's when the city went through a rezoning process you know the master plan was obviously part of that consideration and you know recognizing that that's not the character now but that's the you know the anticipated hope for this area. So we always use plans to help make those decisions and there's just a few differences between the general commercial which is the current zoning and then the you know the I mean excuse me right the request of general commercial versus the CAC and primarily those are heavier commercial uses and auto related uses that are primary the primary difference between the CAC and the general commercial. Thank you I may have missed this but when was this property annexed we know it's been a long time it wasn't recent. Yeah I don't remember the annexation since I've been on planning commission. Okay so it's been in the city's purview for a long time. Okay I can't say for sure what the year was. But it wasn't like last year or something. Okay. Any other questions from Planning Commission for the applicant or staff. Thank you sir. Is there anybody else present that would like to speak for or against this case. If there's anybody present or watching via city TV we would encourage those who would like to comment the email or the web to begin sending in letters and emails. Email should be submitted to COC board meeting at Columbia SC dot gov or on the web at HTTPS colon slash slash public input dot com slash COC PC dash may 2022. For those wanting to leave a voicemail or speak live call eight five five nine two five two eight zero one when prompted please enter the meeting code two two two seven then press star two to leave a voicemail or press star three to speak live. Please be sure your computer audio is off to avoid any feedback. First we will hear from anyone in the audience who would like to speak again. Is there anyone present here in the audience that would like to speak for or against the project or the case. Seeing none we will now hold tight to see if we get any comments and writing or any callers on the line. I've not seen any public comments. Although Lee and our planning staff did send an email that she looked up the annexation history to answer that question and it was annexed March 13th of 1973. Yeah so it's been around for a while. I do not have any callers. Okay. Haven't received no emails and having no callers on the line. Any additional follow up questions from planning commission hearing none I'll accept a motion. Mr. Chair I'd like to make a motion to approve ZMA dash two zero two two dash zero zero zero six fifty six oh nine fair road. Got a motion on the floor to approve. Is there a second. I'll second. Got a motion and a second. All in favor sitting by by saying I. I. Any opposed say no no. The eyes have it three to one. Is there any other business. We do have a little bit of other business. We just wanted to point out that we've got two new appointments to the planning commission. Mr. Steve Cook and Mr. Ryan Causey they will be seated next month at our June meeting for as voting members. This also marks Dr. Mandel who is not with us this evening but her last meeting on planning commission so even though she's not here we did want to thank her for her service and just point out that she's been very dedicated and a student member of the planning commission and that she will be missed and that's from everybody on staff so. But we welcome Mr. Cook and Mr. Causey at our June meeting. Absolutely. I just like to personally thank publicly thank Dr. Mandel for serving with us even though she's not here appreciate her service and what she's done for the planning commission and Mr. Cook and Mr. Causey look forward to having y'all serve with us starting next month I guess so glad to have y'all in the audience as well. Any other business? Hearing none I'll accept the motion that we adjourn. I'll make the motion that we adjourn. Get a motion we adjourn can I get a second. Second. All in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Any opposed no. The meeting is adjourned.