Sen. Josh Stein Debates Voting Restrictions in North Carolina — "Story of America"





The interactive transcript could not be loaded.



Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Jul 30, 2013


Sen. Josh Stein, Democrat from Wake County, is considered a rising star in the Democratic party. His debate with Sen. Bob Rucho (R-Mecklenburg) on the legality, fairness, and the necessity of voting restrictions in North Carolina spanned the final three days of the Senate's 2013 session, culminating in the passage of the most restrictive voting law in the United States, HB 589, which awaits a signature by Gov. Pat McCrory (R). McCrory has said he has not read the legislation but intends to sign it.

Voting rights advocates subsequently delivered copies of the law to the Governor's office. In his defense, the law was crafted hurriedly at the very end of the legislative session. It is speculated that Senate Republicans, who are in general more aggressive about restricting access to the polls than NC House Republicans, were waiting until the Supreme Court's decision on the Voting Rights Act, which they rightly assumed would be favorable to the Republican party.

HB 589 was originally a House Bill (thus the HB) that dealt only with government-issued photo identification as a requirement for all in-person voters. The Senate added 43 pages of additional restrictions, primarily impacting young people, people of color, and the poor, but also impacting the elderly. Sen. Stein goes into detail as to why Democrats disapprove of voting restrictions in general, and, these restrictions in particular (young people and people of color, for instance, are Democratic-leaning constituencies). But Stein also makes the argument that anyone who believes in self-governance for the People should support free and open elections that do not create barriers for citizens who wish to participate, regardless of race, age, economic status, or party affiliation.

During debate in the House, which took place a few hours after this video was shot, and, a few hours before the end of the House's 2013 session, only one Republican rose to debate the bill. Rep. David Lewis (R-Harnett) granted us an interview after the vote, even though it was well passed midnight (video coming soon). In general, he felt that the characterizations of the legislation being made by Democrats were unfair. He pointed out that House Democrats had complained about a ban on Sunday voting, when in fact this had been left out of the bill.

MORE: http://www.storyofamerica.org/josh_stein


When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up next

to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...