 So we have a discussion section of next steps for open force field And this is really a lot of the aim of day two is to you know, we've heard about progress on day one We've heard about some potential directions. We've heard about AI, which I think can stimulate some thinking and Now we really have an open discussion Which in principle was an end of 1230, but we could potentially What's it flow into the next component at the launches of one And Carmen, I guess you're taking notes. So that's awesome And so some of what this comes down to is with all the different possible directions that we could be taking What are our priorities? What are our near-term and what you'd be thinking at more strategically? And these are some potential rationales for putting a piece of work at hot priority One of them is that it's low-hanging fruit. It's easy to implement not to extensively just grab it and do it Another one is that it could be a high anticipated improvement in accuracy Or there could be maybe have to work harder, but it's we anticipate that it's going to be really valuable Another one is to invest in infrastructure the software data And so forth that may not give us a new force field in the next quarter But may let us really crank things out and improve things Over the coming year or year and a half or two years And another potential rationale this goes to discussions that We've had earlier are how to make the case for continued funding. How did that serve? industry partners and convince managers so I sort of broke the topics into three Areas we can discuss aims for the next major open force Mike Mr. Just interrupt. I can't see the slides. Oh Not that okay I made sure we got you shared. Sorry about that. Thanks. Yeah. Thanks for speaking up I got it now Here we go. Thanks. Okay, that's all you missed That's what's it What's it? Yeah, so what what are priorities for moving getting into the next major open force? Which I guess after partially a sage as well as possible interim releases along the way what about what are the foci for software development and What scientific advances do we want to be investing in that fold in later? And I guess I mean part of the way that I think about this Is I mean we've talked about roadmaps that is part of the project and You know, it's nice to have a roadmap that says what you're gonna be doing in six months a year 18 months Whatever, but I think I think of it a little bit more like, you know, we're here and We want to go we want to make improvements And then there's this whole world of possible things that we could be doing, you know, there's approved charge models is improved Optimization methods and really what we want to do is people can be working on these other components Potentially not even funded by open force field directly because a lot of us are doing research in force fields In our own labs. So there's things that are cooking out there and eventually Whether funded by open force field or not something reaches a stage of maturity where we realize Oh, maybe that should be in the next, you know, three to six six month Roadmap for our work. So if something gets pulled in gets funded and gets moved to higher priority So I think that's at least how I'm thinking about How the structure of the work it's sort of the science going on and then there's how you know What the plan is for the next coming months and I think we can think about both aspects in the discussion today but I think the most pressing obviously is What should we be doing what should be focusing on in the next three to six months based on these kinds of criteria so So I've got three points here, there's the next major Release there's software development and there's scientific advances as these are all areas where we can invest effort And resources and so basically there's going to be a slide for each one of these. This is for the next release This is things we could do for software developments and the truncated at the bottom, but I guess we'll survive and then this is potential scientific aims and again some of the scientific stuff in particular and maybe other aspects as well are Probably being developed to some degree by in the PI labs In any case, but it says we move into production that we really have to think about what the goals are for open FF So really what I want to do is open it up for discussion now I don't mean some some decisions we made now, but hopefully we can at least Surface a lot of the issues and considerations. So I really want to open it up So aims for the next open force field release one question is what's the target release date? then I have your priorities for Development so there's sort of lower hanging fruit. So keep on pushing on portions So this this is what that really needs to be done I think to improve the small molecule occupational preferences and it's in process. So that's probably Is on the map? I imagine electrostatics models. There's some reasonably low hanging fruit here. I think Next there's a selection of fitting data what data set expansion of the data set Chemical perception and then some of the more Let me just try to resolve this screen issue