Incoherent questions put to Hitchens and Dawkins





The interactive transcript could not be loaded.


Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Published on Apr 7, 2011

I've noticed that in every debate these guys do there is always one crazy guy in the audience babbling something barely intelligible to the perplexed panel. Here are four such instances and the last one's a doosey.

To be fair to the first guy, he was clearly nervous and a little derailed with Christopher's rather aggressive 'stand up!' demand. The second guy was a berk: 'what I'm saying is very clear cut...'. No it isn't. The last two guys were simply on some incredible drugs.

Note to self: Hitch certainly doesn't suffer fools.

Just for a bit of fun, I've transcribed some of the words from Zak Mason (from Florida)'s face:

'… Why? if you're going to make policy in the Middle East, one of the biggest components of that are religious leaders – and yet here today you are saying let's use these belligerent words, lets use cold and capricious words and say this is the way it has to be written. How do you respond on that?'


When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.

Up next

to add this to Watch Later

Add to

Loading playlists...