 وعلى أهل بيته الطيبين الطاهرين المأسومين المبلومين ولعنة الله على الدعهم أجمعين من الأن إلقيا من يوم الدين آمين يا رب العالمين أرسبت المراءين وشاهدين بكم أرسلكم بالمعلومات من الأن أرسلكم بكم لزيادة من المكالات الأمريكية ومخافيكم بكم لن نتحفظكم بها وحفظكم بكربلا ونحن نتحفظكم بكم سوف نتحدث عن بيسيكس ونذهب إلى بيسيكس عن فيولوجيا ودوريس بردانشل وعلى أفكال ديسبوط بين نفسنا وأخرنا أو أفكارات من أولئي الذين يريدون أن نستخدم ذلك وإمكانهم أن يتحدث ليست مجدداً كل مجموعة سوف يتحدث في ديسبوط أو مجموعة مجموعة ولكن ربما نحن نتحدث عن أولئي الذين لا يتحدث أولئي الذين لا يتحدث هذا شيء جدًا وهذا هو الشوء على الشيء الذي يريد أن يتحدث بجدًا أجد مفيدات إلى ذلك المتحدة اليوم بالطبع سنوات من ثوريس أو بل نقول في أربك أنه يكون أسرعاً لأشخاص الذين لا يعرفون المجموعة سنوات من سنوات لأنه سنوات من سنوات وكذلك سنوات الماضية لذا يحصل على سنوات ونحن نتحدث عن سنوات من سنوات ليلة الجمال لذا when we say this نحن نرى أن هناك محاولة جداً في محاولاتنا لكي يجب أن نذهب إلى المدينة الهولية في كربلة وهذا هو why on a night like this المدينة الهولية في كربلة سيكون بخطة وخطأة مع الكثير من زوار أولاً يأتي من أخرين محاولات ومدينة في مدينة العربية of Iraq ولكن one thing that I thought was quite interesting to tie into this, of course, is لدينا أكثر محاولات في one of our books called كامل زيارات التي تكلمنا عن كامل زيارات بالطبع أنها محاولة ومهمة جداً بشكل جيد من one of our great theologians إبن كولا ويه وفي هذه المحاولات هذه المحاولات تدخل بشكل كربلة على مدينة المدينة الهولية في كربلة على مدينة الهولية في كربلة يذهب إلى المدينة الهولية بشكل كربلة أنا أريدك أن تستمتع إلى مدينة الهولية أن الله يجعل المدينة تدخل في مدينة الهولية وكذلك يجب أن تكون محاولات ومحاولات ويجب أن تكون محاولات بشكل كربلة لكن كيف حدثنا العلماء في هذه المحاولات؟ كل العلماء without failure الذين يتكلمون عن هذه المحاولات يجب أن يتكلم أن هذه المحاولات لا يستطيع أن تكون محاولات حقاً لكننا لدينا هؤلاء أخرين لتخبص they wish to distort and wish to attempt to divide Washi'a in regards to their beliefs by casting aspersion and doubt upon this narration It's quite a prophetic tactic Firstly, this narration is narrated and normally utilized in the area that we would call تاربيب تاربيب وخ Wii It mentions the merits of a certain action It is not being compiled into works of theology ليست مستخدمة كتابة لتأكد من سفادة وإطلاقات الله لذلك نسأل المسؤولين الذين يفعلون الفيديو about this particular narration ماذا يفعلون؟ يفعلون هو أن نحاول أن نحاول أن يكون لدينا مهمة لتأكد من الله وأننا نحن نعتقد أنه يأتي في بيزت سيما محمد الهسين وأن هذا أكتف كفر بالتأكيد ما يجب أن يتكلم هنا is that what's particularly problematic is those who engage in the action known as projection projection of course is where you have a certain negative trait and you see other people who might have something similar to that negative trait and you begin to hate that trait that you see in other people they might not even have that trait but you see it in them and you project that trait onto them because really you're disgusted by that very trait within yourselves and I really feel that with all due respect Insha'Allah I'm trying my best not to offend anyone but with all due respect to those who come forward with this point we really are looking at a case of projection and the reason I say this is because if you look at their theological framework the way that they interpret the attributes of Allah is very particular world view you would see that this is their way of engaging with the traditions and not the way of the she'a the she'a have a principle that with such a narration like this that because it's خبر الأهد and because it's not even صحيح that such a narration even if it were صحيح would not form a theological basis because it goes against the intellect number one and number two it goes against the plafora of sound authentic traditions which states that Allah does not have a body and does not move so when we know that we know that we have a sound framework by which we interpret such narrations and it's a perfect example of the thing I was discussing in the previous few episodes a conceptual framework for the interpretation of religious texts and doctrines but those protagonists who attacked the she'a for this particular narration is there any reason why there would be a particular I don't want to use the word sickness but deficiency that caused them to believe that she'as would view things in such a way I believe that there is and allow me to reaffirm that the Salafi or Athari doctrine is to affirm them and what's found in the narration without dwelling into the nature of modality or the howness of something so they'll affirm an attribute spoken of in the narrations and they will not discuss how we've seen already that Salafis believe that Allah has a form and we'll come to that more later but for now I wanted to quote something from in his سعلى فبيلة الشيخ هل نثبت سفات الملل لله يا زوجل فأجاب بقوله so he responded with his saying جاء في الحديث أنا النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم صلى الله عليه و آله so there are from amongst the scholars those who say but this certainly proves boredom tiredness or weariness as an attribute for Allah لكن ملل الله ليس كملل المخلوق however this action of tiredness boredom or weariness is not like the tiredness boredom or weariness of the creation even and the tiredness or weariness of the creatures is imperfect and he goes on to say whereas be tiredness weariness or boredom of Allah is perfect he states that whilst this is an established doctrine because the ulema who affirmed this believe in it based upon veneration but then he goes on to state just to be fair ومنهم من قال إن هذا الحديث لا يدل على السفات الملل لله إطلاقا لأن قول القائل لا أقوم حتى تقوم لا يستلزم قيام الثاني وهذا أيضا لا يملو حتى تملو لا يستلزم ثبوت الملل لله يا زوجل وقال لكل حال يجب علينا أن نقتقد إن الله منزح عن كل السفة الناقص من الملل وغيره فإذا ثبت إن هذا الحديث تليل على ملل فالمراد به ملل ليس كملل المخلوق ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول ويقول يكتب أنه مالذي يحصل على الله يجب أنه ليس تشعر بالمعيدة لأن الله كما يفعله لكن المؤسس here is these scholars in their literalism why would they take an attribute such as boredom, weariness or tiredness ونجد أجل هذه الشيئة إلى الله لماذا لم يستخدمون أجلها ويقول أنها نحن سنستطيع أن نقوم بإدعاء أخر من الآخر من أثامين؟ هل أنها لأنها لأنها لا تلتق بكثيرا وأن الإنترالات لا تنقل فيها؟ دعنا نأخذ أعضاء أكثر من أعضاء أكثر من الأجل من أين هذا الأمر يمكن أن تدعم one into a mess one of the narrations found in the Sahih of Bukhari I'll state the translation and I'll cite the translation from an official translation narrated from Abu Hurairah that the Prophet ﷺ said Allah created the creation and upon finishing the rahm, the womb it got up and took hold of the loins of Ar-Rahman it took hold of the loins of Ar-Rahman Ar-Rahman of course being a name of Allah as a وجل الله said to it what is wrong the womb said I seek refuge with you from Al-Qati'a the one who severs the ties of the family Allah said would you be pleased if I bestow my favours on him who keeps your ties and withhold my favours from he who severs your ties the womb responded certainly O Lord Allah said that is granted so Abu Hurairah comments if you want you can recite the verse would you then if given authority do mischief in the land and cut the ties of kinship Ar-Hamakum that's Surah 47 verse 22 so we notice here that it says that the womb grabbed hold of the loins of Allah as وجل how do the scholars comment on this it's mentioned in Fatah Al-Bari of Ibn Hajar Al-Askelani وفي رواية ابن السكان فأخذت بالحق وير-Rahman وفي رواية التبري بحق وير-Rahman بتثنية and in the reports of Ibn Sak'in of the words and seized the loins of Ar-Rahman and in the reports of a Tabari and seized the Haq-Wee of Ar-Rahman so we see that these commentators have specifically stated it's referring to the loins of Allah join us after the break in which we continue analyzing this particular narration dear viewers, thank you for joining us after that short break we see that the Salafi position when restated is we must affirm whatever Allah and his messenger alayhi salam affirmed for him we must take the attributes upon the literal without describing the howness so embracing this principle we must affirm that Allah has loins or Haqan some of you are thinking that this has never been done before and we don't normally see the scholars affirming loins for Allah as a wajal but we find that one of the classical scholars of the Salafi school whose name is Ibn Hamid states the following فتخف الرحم بحقوه it is obligatory to believe that I'm sorry I'm just going to request the brothers in the studio to turn off my echo, thank you it is obligatory to believe or affirm that Allah does have a loin and that the womb actually attaches itself to it so this is a statement of a classical scholar we must believe that Allah has a loin brothers and sisters this is affirmation of this loin for Allah what does it mean to have a loin and I know we're going to be told that this is a loin which befits the majesty of Allah as a wajal but seriously is this the intellectually respectful Tauheed the Tauheed that respects the intellect of a human being tell us what it means enough we've been told that Allah as a wajal has a shadow and a shade and we affirm these things we've been told that some scholars affirm that Allah as a wajal gets tired bored and weary and yet we're told that these are all things that befit his majesty this is a disaster for human interpretation of the Quran and if we want to take this literal stance let's apply it literally on everything we come to the nature of Allah as a wajal and the shape of Allah as a wajal let's see what this school believes about the shape of Allah as a wajal this form which is like Kasper of a friendly ghost but better according to some of her online apologists Abu Huraira reported that Allah's messenger said Allah the exalted and glorious created Adam in his own image with his length of 60 qubits and as he created him to greet that group and that was a party of angels sitting there and listen to the response that they gave him for it would form his greetings and that of his offspring he then went away and said peace be upon you the angels said may there be peace be upon you and the mercy of Allah and they made an addition of the mercy of Allah so he would get into paradise so he who would get into paradise would get in the form of Adam his length being 60 qubits and the people who followed him continued to diminish in size up to this day so Allah according to this narration which clearly states that Adam has been created upon his image is 60 qubits tall as well do we see human beings who are 60 qubits tall today this is not just any narration this is a narration found in Sahih Muslim this particular narration is found in Sahih Muslim a very authentic narration which is considered to be a narration taken for Aqaida so we're told respect the intellect come to Islam but when you get into Islam turn off the intellect why? because which intellect is going to believe that Allah Azawajal is 60 qubits long or that we have ancestors which were 60 qubits long for anyone out there who wants to listen to this I want you to look up how big 60 qubits long is and ask yourself do we have the possibility of human beings walking the surface of this earth as being 60 qubits long this methodology which doesn't respect the intellect is one that must be abolished one that must be cast to the side further than that if we want to take this literalist method of how to believe in what we read about on the surface value then why is it that Salafis have objections to us saying that Allah Azawajal allows us to call ourselves servants of anything other than Him let's take an ayah of the Qur'an and this ayah is Surah 39 ayah 53 where it states say all my servants who have acted extravagantly against their own souls do not despair of the mercy of Allah surely Allah forgives the faults altogether surely He is forgiving the merciful this particular verse it states clearly say and it's addressed in the Holy Prophet all my servants so when the Prophet says say when the Prophet says all my servants is he narrating the words of Allah Azawajal or is Allah commanding him to address people as literally His servants if we want to take this literalist methodology we know fine well how it's going to go for those of you who want to see how respectful to the intellect this methodology really is let's go one step further have you ever asked Salafi why they affirm that Allah Azawajal has two eyes why they affirm that Allah Azawajal has specifically two eyes if you want to go back on that forum that I mentioned a few nights ago but I cited my friend ملتق أحل الحديث see the forum and the thread where he asks ملتق أحل الحديث they will all quote for you the following narration عبداله بن عمر narrates in Sahih Al-Bukhari once Allah's apostles stood amongst the people glorified and praised Allah as He deserved and then mentioned for the Jal saying I warn you against him I eva the Jal that there was no prophet but warned his nation against him no doubt no a warned his nation against him if you knew about him something of which no prophet told his nation before me you should know that he is one eyeed and Allah is not one eyeed so this particular narration is utilized by them another narration which is utilized by them is also in Sahih Al-Bukhari عبداله narrates that the prophet mentioned المصيحة الدجال in front of the people saying Allah is not one eyeed while the Messiah or the false messiah is blind in the right eye so they have taken this narration this narration that anyone else would take and say that look Allah is not for the Jal they have taken it and stated that no but the Jal is described as being blind in one eye having a deformed eye and Allah is not one eyeed where in the Quran doesn't say that Allah has two eyes is this a good enough basis for affirming two literal eyes for Allah furthermore let's look at the consequences of using this to affirm that doctrine are you telling me that if it were not for this narration that states that the Jal has one eye and Allah is not one eyeed that we would have perhaps been confused that the Jal is when when these people come to us and they say that you the shia raise the status of the imams to the status of God head we have to wonder what kind of deficient and prophetic God are we talking about what kind of limited God are we talking about that by me attributing the ability to do extra miracles and extra abilities which are God given to a man it puts him on God the clear answer to this is if you believe Allah is like the Jal but the main difference between the two for you to distinguish is that the Jal only has one eye whereas Allah has two then clearly we can see why you believe that the imams we believe in are better than that God because our imams have four more abilities than just this the Jal and the imams are clearly distinct from this Antichrist whereas Allah is the only distinction between him and the Antichrist here is that Allah does not have one eye brothers and sisters when it comes to the nature of not trusting the intellect let's look at the real problem here one of the real problems here is that as for the atheists we come forward with certain theological proofs certain theological evidences which we use to try and convince the atheists of the existence of God one of them would be for example why anything that appears in front of me be it these books or these tables or even myself must have we know it's not always been there and one of the proofs for that is it has certain limitations and we ask ourselves what gave it the limitations and we say that because it has limitations we know it's not eternal and it's not divine yet these people place limitations on Allah and do takfir of those who don't believe that Allah has limitations they say that it's a deviant position to not affirm a form for Allah az-wajal what is a form it means a distinction what is that distinct nature it means a nature that has certain limitations and differs it from something else they believe that Allah has limitations and this methodology is one that does not respect the intellect and all we're asking for in the discussion of world views is that we respect the human intellect Dear viewers thank you once more for joining me I pray that you can join us in the next episodes after one day insha'Allah و السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته