 But her clips speaks to specifically, specifically, this is right out of your book, which is you make the point that, hey, people, when they're resuscitated, they claim to have seen things that they shouldn't be able to see. Well, they've seen it on TV. They make it up. Here's a researcher who asked that question with the control group. I had then patients who had been successfully resuscitated, but they didn't have any ADF experience, or they didn't have the outer body component. And I asked them if they could describe what they thought that we had done to them. And they were like, what do you mean? I was dead. I don't remember anything, right? Exactly. That's right. And they were saying, why are you asking me this? I have no idea what you did to me at all. The majority of them couldn't even guess. They couldn't make a guess as to what we'd done. And then a few of them then did make a guess. And it was based on TV hospital dramas that they've been watching. And what I found is that there were errors and misconceptions in what they thought we had done to them. And so some of them thought that they had been DC shocked with the paddles. And those people had just had the resuscitation, the CPR, and drugs administered, such as adrenaline or noradrenaline. And then some of them made educated guesses. But the place where they thought that we put the paddles onto their body was completely erroneous. It was wrong. It was incorrect. Data data, you know, this is great stuff. Yeah. So it just, you know, it just goes to show that the people who did report the near death experience described their experience with accuracy, whereas the control group weren't accurate. And most of them couldn't even hazard a guess. Okay. So first of all, full disclosure, you didn't know about that research? I know about similar research to this, that what are the objective criteria by which they decide whether a narrative account is a hit or a miss of what they did? How many details have to get correct for you to say, yes, that's accurate for what we were doing to you? No, you must have gotten that from a TV drama, because that's not what we did to you. This is a basic, basic scientific story. No, no, this is super in science. You have to operate. I'm glad you're back to science. She wrote and published a peer reviewed paper. What, what, what was the criteria for deciding if a narrative was a hit or a miss?