 Yn ymgyrch am yma, mae'n Martin Broberg, profesiwn y Llyfrgell Dynol, yng Nghymru yn Ymgyrch Gwyrddon Codd, yng Nghymru yn ymgyrch yn y Lath Arfer, ac yn ymgyrch yn yr ymgyrch yn ymgyrch, mae'n ymgyrch yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch. Ond yw'n gweithio'r ysgrifennu Brydgysgrifennu Brydgysgrifennu yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch yn ymgyrch? Rwy. The Pin Union has these 28 member states, and there are quite big differences. The Danes perspective is very much like the Briggs one, so when I was working in the civil service in Denmark for the Minister of Justice and negotiating on behalf of Denmark, we would normally follow the bridge's lead, and in this regard, it's very important to be aware that the British are really punishing what a say about its weight. Britten is one of three major member states, and at the same time, Britain is much stronger than the other member states. So what I found surprising was that the British Civil Service, Whitehall, had not only the resources, the manpower, but also the skills to really run and drive forward the negotiations in the interests of the British, but also, of course, as we were like in the interest of the Danes, the Swedes and also the Finns. So we would normally follow the British whenever there was something coming up, and it was not so that you had a fight between the member states. You would find that the British would drive the negotiations and the opponent would very often be the Commission. So we had this very reluctant British, very reluctant Danish perspective on the number of issues, and we would find that the outcome would very much be what the British had wanted. And I think that is important also from a Danish perspective. Of course, we really used the British, so to say, as the one spearheading in negotiations, and we would certainly not always be in agreement, of course, but we would try to support the British as best we could. So why do you think the British press has this idea that Britain has no influence within the EU? I guess that that is partly because if you are going to win all these battles, that are going on in process, honestly, on a daily basis. If you come out and show that you have won all the battles, you're not going to win the next one. So you have to keep a low profile, which means that I probably shouldn't say it so here, but really I was really impressed by the British, well, Whitehall, the British Civil Service. They really drove the things forward. They were almost very well prepared. They had a lot of people working on the topics. I would work part-time of one. I know there was a small department in the British Civil Service working on the same topic. And if they came out and said, right, look, we managed to squeeze the commission into the corner, that would mean that the commission next time, and some of the other members, would probably not be as willing to be squeezed into the corner. So I think there are very good reasons why you don't come forward as a diplomat saying that you have won rather than the country. You pretend that you have not won, so you can win the next battle also, obviously. And do you have any views about the impact of Brexit, if the UK votes to leave in June? What might be the consequence of that for Danish Anglo-relations, Denmark? Well, from the Danish perspective, that would be a disaster, honestly, because since we are somewhat aligned with the British viewpoints, and since we don't have the resources, that would basically mean that we would have to find another way of pushing our views through, which is like not to happen, really. So there will be a vacuum if the priests were to leave, and that vacuum has to be filled, and we will probably see what I would call a more integrationist approach from the European Union side, because then you don't have the more realist, if I might put it like that, approach of the British, of the Danes, which means that you will find a different policy, I assume. That would be most likely, I would guess. Is there something that you think ought to be better communicated to the general public in anticipation of the referendum? I think that what you really need in this referendum debate going on is that we find today that Britain has a lot of influence, and that influence will be lost. Britain's influence is really power. Britain is in the negotiation room at the moment, and that power, if you're leaving that room, is lost. What is coming in place for that? I don't know, but I don't see Britain being strong outside the European Union as compared to the present situation. Thank you very much. You're welcome.