 Check 1, 2, 3. Today is June 10, 2011 at Harvard University Law School after an extraordinary, extraordinary symposium at the Beckman Center. Internet law, society, surveillance, public space, hyper-public configurations were dealt with today with a swift hand by a number of dramatic speakers. It's been a very rich day. We've covered a lot of grounds. We had, you know, speakers from various disciplines introduce their views and perspectives on the topic privacy and the public and how, you know, digital technologies actually blurred the lines between these two poles. For me, the delight is actually to watch people from different disciplines come together and really grapple with really hard sessions. So the nice thing about this community is you bring together the folks who are really thinking about design and architectures, sort of an historical sense, people who are thinking about technology, people who are thinking about law and sort of social sciences. It's amazing how we can see sort of common threads and total disconnect. The difference in perspective between those who are engaged largely in managing and developing information infrastructures versus the perspective of people involved in big curation and construction of actual physical public spaces at the intersection between the two brought a very rich set of perspectives that don't necessarily converge in terms of their core values. It certainly expanded my notion of the alternatives to privacy. And I think that the ways in which we're able to see today different definitions of publicness, the move between physical and virtual spaces was really exciting. Very deep observation on human communication, which is not only always about communicating, but also about creating groups, finding your identity in self-formed groups. And it's also about inviting people in and keeping people out of communications. I found this very interesting.