 Only about 1 in 10,000 people make it to be 100 years old. What's their secret? While in 1993 a major breakthrough in longevity research was published, a single genetic mutation that doubled the lifespan of a tiny round worm. Instead of all being dead by 30 days, the mutants lived 60 days or longer. This lifespan extension was the largest yet reported in any organism. This Methuselaworm, medical marvel, is the equivalent of producing a healthy 200-year-old human. All because of a single mutation? That shouldn't happen. I mean, presumably aging is caused by multiple processes. Many genes. How could just knocking out one gene double the lifespan? What is this aging gene anyway? This gene that so speeds up aging that if it's knocked out, the animals live twice as long. It's been called the Grim Reaper gene. What is it? It's the worm equivalent of the human IGF-1 receptor. And mutations of that same receptor in humans may help explain why some people live to be 100 and other people don't. So is it just the luck of the draw, whether we got good genes or bad? No, we can turn on and off the expression of these genes, depending on what we eat. Three years ago, I profiled a remarkable series of experiments about IGF-1 insulin-like growth factor 1, this cancer-promoting growth hormone released in excess amounts by our liver when we eat animal protein. So men and women who don't eat meat, egg, white, or dairy proteins have significantly lower levels circulated within their bodies. Switching people to a plant-based diet can significantly lower IGF-1 levels within just 11 days markedly, improving the ability of women's bloodstreams to suppress breast cancer growth and then kill breast cancer cells off. Similarly, the blood serum of men on plant-based diets suppresses prostate cancer cell growth about 8 times better than before they changed their diet. This dramatic improvement in cancer defenses is, however, abolished if you add back just the amount of IGF-1 banished from their systems because they were eating and living healthier. This is one way to explain the low rates of cancer among plant-based populations. The drop in animal protein intake leads to a drop in IGF-1, which leads to a drop in cancer growth. In effect, so powerful, Dr. Dean Ornish and colleagues appear to be able to reverse the progression of early-stage prostate cancer without chemo-surgery or radiation, just a plant-based diet, and other healthy lifestyle changes. Now when we're kids, we need growth hormones to grow. I mean, there's a rare genetic defect that causes severe IGF-1 deficiency, leading to a type of dwarfism, but also apparently makes you effectively cancer-proof. Not a single death from cancer in about 100 individuals with IGF-1 deficiency. How about 200 individuals? None developed cancer. See, most malignant tumors are covered in IGF-1 receptors, but if there's no IGF-1 around, then they may not be able to grow and spread. This may help explain why those eating low-carb diets appear to cut their lives short, but not just any low-carb diet, specifically those based on animal sources, whereas vegetable-based low-carb diets were associated with a lower risk of death. But look, low-carb diets are high in animal fat, as well as animal protein. So how do we know it wasn't the saturated animal fat that was killing people off and had nothing to do with the protein? What we need is a study that just falls a few thousand people and their protein intakes for 20 years or so and just see who lives longest, who gets cancer, who doesn't. But there's never been a study like that until now. 6,000 men and women over age 50 from across the US followed for 18 years and those under age 65 with high protein intakes had a 75% increase in overall mortality and a four-fold increase in the risk of dying from cancer. But not all proteins, these associations were either abolished or attenuated if the proteins were plant-derived, which all makes sense given the higher IGF-1 levels among those eating lots of protein. The sponsoring university sent out a press release with a memorable opening line, that chicken wing you're eating could be as deadly as a cigarette, explaining that eating a diet rich in animal proteins during middle age makes you four times more likely to die from cancer than someone with a low protein diet. Mortality risk factors are comparable to smoking cigarettes. And when they say low protein diet, what they actually mean is just getting the recommended amount of protein. Almost everyone's going to have a cancer cell or a pre-cancerous cell in them at some point. The question is, does it progress? Said one of the lead researchers, that may depend on what we eat. The question is not whether a certain diet allows you to do well in the short term, one of the researchers noted, but can it help you survive to be 100? It wasn't just more deaths from cancer. Middle-aged people who eat lots of protein from animal sources were found to be more susceptible to early death in general. Crucially, the same did not apply to plant proteins, like beans, and it wasn't the fat, but the animal protein that appeared to be the culprit. What was the response to the revelation that diets high in meat, eggs, and dairy could be harmed for the health of smoking? Well, one nutrition scientist replied that it was potentially dangerous. It could damage the effectiveness of important public health measures. Just why? Well, a smoker might think, hey, why bother quitting smoking if my hemorrhage sandwich is just as bad for me? That reminds me of a famous Philip Morris cigarette ad that tried to downplay the risk by saying, hey, you think secondhand smoke is bad, increasing the risk of lung cancer 19%. Well, hey, drinking one or two glasses of milk every day, maybe three times as bad, 62% increased risk of lung cancer, or doubling the risk, frequently cooking with oil, or tripling the risk of heart disease-eating non-vegetarian, or multiplying the risk sixfold, eating lots of meat and dairy, so they conclude, let's keep some perspective here. The risk of cancer from secondhand smoke may be well below that of other everyday activities, so breathe deep. That's like saying, yeah, don't worry about getting stabbed, because getting shot so much worse. That's like saying, if you don't wear seatbelts, might as well have unprotected sex. If you go bungee jumping, might as well disconnect your smoke alarms at home. Two risks don't make a right. Of course, you'll note Philip Morris stopped throwing dairy under the bus once they purchased craft foods.