 My name is Michael Peters and I'm part of the management team of the livestock and fish CRP and my task today is to describe two scenarios which would mean scenario one continuous current livestock and fish focus and just expand that to the next CRP phase and the other scenario would be that CRP would be responsible for the whole livestock agenda in the CG There is a brief based on these two concepts and I would summarize that and put the constraints I see the differences I see and as a topic for discussion Obviously scenario two would mean a shift of resources from other CRPs to the livestock and fish CRP but more important than only the budget there are a few issues So the original focus of livestock and fish is on sustainable intensification for food and nutrition security If we are taking the whole livestock agenda, this agenda obviously needs to be vastly expanded and a few of the concepts are shown below For the time being we are using very very defined value chains across a few countries which includes dairy, pig value chain, fish value chain and double purpose value chain and small ruminant value chains The question is if we have the global agenda or an expanded agenda can we stick to this very defined value chains or do we need to amplify them to other places which may be not that easy that's recognizing that if the current value chains which we are working on we have still issues to fully implement them In the current agenda the technology flagships which is animal genetics, animal and fish genetics animal health and feats and forages would be maintained and in the new scenario it would be the human health agenda expanded but forage and feats are not more clearly defined which have a personal issue with that animal health and animal genetics would be maintained forages and feats would shift from forages and feats to animal nutrition and there could be a content by similarity but we lose completely visibility for forages and feats and this in the context of an increased attention to these themes and recognizing forages as a crop with the largest expansion worldwide bigger than for example rice and I think there need to be a very thorough discussion on that In the current scenario it would give more attention than we have in the past few years on environmental issues such as mitigation of greenhouse gases, land use changes, land accreditation and in the new scenario how it is currently shown this environment dimension is not coming fully through so as it stated as a moment is mainly related to animal nutrition but probably the agenda is much more broad and we would not have in a global livestock agenda scenario as it presented currently so whole interaction with crops and trees and that would mean we would lose a full perspective again discussion needed In the current scenario the agenda would amplify this novel feature sources and that would happen basically in both places as well we would have a very different focus on our systems and sustainability agenda which currently includes a lot of targeting and environmental dimension and in the new system would focus more on social sciences including human nutrition the new version is probably more complete but I guess even the wider application as shown in the new scenario could be put also in the current scenario at the moment what we have there are clear possibilities for cross-CIP integration with the GeneBank system, CIPs, Health, WLE, Routes & Troubles, CCARs and whatever there would be the new focus would be mainly on health and Routes & Troubles again I would say that we need to discuss if that's not too limited in focus what is much better in the new scenario is a clear role of policy and so this still works against something we could put whatever to agendas and in generally in the new phase we need to strengthen business aspects so in short this needs further discussion and I personally coming out of it I see a particular strong problem how it currently presented global scenario to global livestock agenda for the role of forages in the system which needs to be in my view much better highlighted and secondly we are losing a lot of environmental dimension in the possible interaction in systems thank you