 There aren't too many people that you can talk about on YouTube that it's not going to get a strong reaction from one side of the crowd or the other. It doesn't matter which way you view this person, whether you're for him or against him, especially if you're for him, you're going to see a lot of strong, in many cases, visceral reactions from people who are for Gino Jennings. Say anything, anything that sounds like any sort of critique, they're coming at you. Now, I first heard of Gino Jennings probably about a year ago, and when I first heard him, he was making a comment or it was about a statement or something that T.D. Jake said, and I'll cover that in a little bit. But what I heard, they go, yeah, this guy's on. And so, you know what YouTube does, it refers more of his content to you or anyone making content about Gino Jennings. And so I got more. And as I became more familiar with him, I began to notice some things that were just really alarming. Now, let me say this upfront. The Gino Jennings style is going to appeal to a lot of people. He does make a lot of good points on a lot of issues, particularly some of the issues that are social in nature, and then kind of giving a biblical response to it, such as the way men and women dress. You have some first lady in churches, pastor wives. You look like this. You let your children look like this. You let many of the mothers in the church look like this. You go to so-called Christian concerts, and the women look like this. The Bible says, in like manner also, that women are doing themselves in modest apparel. What is so modest about this? He was spot on in dealing with how women ought to, older women ought to train and give guidance to younger women. How in the world can you teach young sisters how to be sober if you are no drunk? You can't do that. No, no. Listen. That they may teach the young women. When you teach the young women how to be sober, you got a stable mind. That's right. Stable mind. Amen. When you see your mother not flirtatious things, she won't learn how to be flirtatious. Amen. When your mother sees that the door is flirtatious and the mother put her in, you got a good mother, she'll put you in check. That's right. Amen. That's right. Is that right? You know, the mother's in the old time, the boy wasn't allowed to just come in and out of your house. And as I said, even when he was dealing with T.D. Jakes and his response to an interview, he was spot on there. He asked Jakes a question. Can homosexuality, in fact the interview was on YouTube, can homosexuality and the church coexist? Jakes didn't stutter. Jakes said, well, certainly. Then Jakes said, there's many ways, there's a whole lot of ways to get to God. Use a liar. I even saw an interview that he did at some radio station and the way they were kind of going at him, they were wrong and Gino was right. Gino comported himself in a mature manner, a respectful manner. He didn't attack them, but he made his point as to why he's saying such things. And so there are some things that I can go along with Gino on these things. However, there are some things that I don't agree with and I need to say something. Now, I really do believe that Gino Jennings is sincere. I believe that he believes what he's saying is true. There are some things that you might question that I have questioned as to whether he legitimately believes are of God. But for the most part, I think that he is a sincere person. He is, without question, bold in his speech. Now, does that mean that he is actually a Christian? Well, we'll discuss that as we go. Because remember, and I'm not saying this right now, but being bold or being sincere does not necessarily mean that you're a Christian. There were a lot of people who were sincere, but were sincerely wrong and were not Christian. Are the suicide bombers of the Taliban, are they sincere? Sure. They mean what they really mean, what they say. So that doesn't mean anything. It's just you're a doctrine that has to line up. That's a comport with scriptures for us to see if a person actually really is a Christian or not. I've said in the past that if you want to know if you're a leader, then what do you do? Look back. If you don't see anyone following, then you're not a leader. The same holds true when you want to see what kind of a leader you are. Look back. See what kind of people are following you. I say that because when you look at the people that follow Gino Jennings, you get a clear indication of who Gino Jennings is himself. And I don't mean a random one or two or three different followers who don't behave a certain way. No, a lot of times they mimic who the person is that they're following. You'll see a lot of name calling and insults that are hurled around. And they really mean that the vitriol that comes from these so-called, these professing believers, doesn't really sound all that godly oftentimes. These people tend to be kind of loud, rude, as I said, insulting. And I'm just going to be honest, sometimes a bit uneducated. Not that you have to be educated to understand the scriptures or to be a Christian, no? But some of the things that you say is like, wait a second, that didn't even make sense. That wasn't even a mature statement. To give you an example, let me just show you some of the comments that I have received from a lot of his followers on a video that I did basically saying, no, Gino, you are not an apostle. These comments are, there's nothing godly about it. But those are the ones that you really don't have too much of an issue with because people are going to say and do childish and silly things. The ones that are the more disheartening are the ones that seem to elevate Gino to a status that is not reserved for a common man. Not just to the status of an apostle, but something even more special than an apostle, almost on the lines of Deity himself. I know they don't think that he's deity, but the way that they reverence him, that's only reserved for God, right? And as you see, they like that tough talk, that bravado. They like to give it. The only problem is oftentimes they don't like to receive it. But me, listen, I don't mind giving it the way you like to receive it. So with that being said, let's get to it. When you watch Gino Jennings and you look at his church services at the first church of our Lord Jesus Christ, I think that's what it's called, and even the YouTube channel. One of the first things that stick out is kind of the control that he has, not just over the men in the pulpit with him, but also the control that he has in the audience. You'll notice that he has the women separated from the men for the most part. You'll notice how the women are dressed. They cannot come there without having their head literally covered in some sort of hat or scarf or some sort of cloth covering. He takes this verse really seriously, really literally. It's almost a nation of Islam-esque type of approach that he has. That's where, if you're wondering where you've seen this before, well, look no further than Louis Farrakhan. Am I saying he's a Muslim? Am I saying that he's an admirer? Maybe in his style, but he's not promoting Islam or the nation of Islam. That's not what I'm saying, but just his style. Even to the point where his Bible, someone pointed this out, that his Bible even looks like a Koran. It's designed in the way that a Koran is. Again, that's just some things, you just notice those things. Plus the fact, not just the separation of the men and the women, but the guys that you have on stage. Not that it's a bad thing or it's a sin, but it just sticks out. The man that you have beside you always is almost like a hype man. Not just reading scripture, but he just kind of, he preaches along with Gino. I'm not sure what the gentleman's name is, but it sticks out. Not a big issue though. It's not an issue where you say, you know what, I can't listen to him because of that, that he's ungodly because of that. Is there a scripture that says you shouldn't separate the men and the women? No, but you would think that you would have the husbands and the wives there together sitting beside each other. There's something else I'm going to point out about the men and the women that seems to happen in worship with one group versus the other that's just really odd. And his style, like I said, is a little different, but I could let all of that go. It wouldn't bother me too much. Okay, that's his personal style. A lot of preachers, a lot of pastors have their own personal style. I could let that go. What I can't let go is the doctrine. Gino Jennings, obviously, he has, he's a oneness Pentecostal apostolic. He does not believe, and we'll cover these, all these, he does not believe that you are saved eternally, that your salvation is secured. In other words, he does not believe in one saved, always saved, or eternal security. He believes that you can lose your salvation. And we've gone over this a bunch of times in different passages, but it's clear. One, what God says is that he is going to sprinkle our hearts clean. He's going to make our hearts clean as he sprinkles water and pours his spirit into our heart, and then he is going to, he, God, is going to cause us to walk in his statue, then we will never depart from them. That's clear. Jesus tells us in John 15 that we must abide and we must bear fruit. That's true. You have to abide. There's no such thing as abiding for a minute and then leaving and still having salvation. No, you must remain. You must abide. You must continue. But then he goes on to say later on in John 15 that he has ordained us or appointed us or placed us to continue and that our fruit should remain. Now I'll come back to the Greek portion I just mentioned a little later about something that I think is really troubling and concerning about Gino. But let me be clear. If all he did was believe that you can lose your salvation, alarms wouldn't go off still. I think that's a bad teaching to teach that you can lose your salvation. I think that teaches that there is no real faith and trust in what Christ did. But many people who love the Lord, I think who love the Lord hold to that or people who struggle with this thing as to whether you can lose your salvation. There are many folks who struggle with that. And so I wouldn't put him in the category of heretic or a false teacher or anything like that because of that. But there are other issues that are troubling. Most notably that the first thing that sticks out is the fact that you call yourself, he calls himself an apostle. Well, and I've covered this before and I don't think people are getting this. One, to be an apostle, that is a foundational office, meaning the foundation was laid. The church is built off of these apostles, meaning someone had to send you to make you an apostle of the church. An apostle of Jesus Christ. Well, who sent these apostles? Jesus. Gino Jennings is not an apostle of Jesus. Now, in a basic sense, anybody can be an apostle. Anybody can send someone, but not just anyone can claim to have been sent by Jesus because the next question is who were you sent to? Jesus sent out his 12 apostles to the Jews. And so this is how the church is built based off of them and them putting out the gospel. And then also training others to learn and to teach the gospel to others. But these are the foundations to which Jesus Christ is the chief cornerstone. And so what does Paul tell us in 1 Corinthians 3? He says, for no one can lay a foundation other than that which is laid, which is Jesus Christ. Paul also says in Ephesians 2, 20, he says about this household of God. It is built on the foundation of, and he gives a chronology, built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets. Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone. Some verses may say the chief cornerstone. And so the first thing he does is building his churches off of these apostles. The first to receive the Holy Spirit, the apostles. Then after that, then they begin to give authority or lay hands on people so that it is clear that not just they, but also these other Jews have the Holy Spirit. Which is the identifying mark of a believer is to have the Holy Spirit. Then they also lay hands on who? The Samaritans. Remember he gives a chronology to them in Acts 1-8 that you should be my witnesses first to Jerusalem, Judea, the Jews, and then Samaria, the Samaritans, and then to the rest of the world. And then they also go and lay hands on the Gentiles. And so that way everyone can see one, hear the gospel being preached in different languages. But then also they can see as a sign to the church, the Jewish church, or the Jews in the church, that these also, not just they alone, they also have received the Holy Spirit. And so it's clear that to be a believer, you will have the Holy Spirit and they see that now in the beginning of the church. And so they start off with these apostles and prophets. Also this is Jesus to which, and to which Jesus is the chief cornerstone. And so there is no other foundation that can be laid in. So if a person asks themselves, can I actually, can I legitimately be an apostle like them? The answer has to be no, because you cannot lay a new foundation. If you do, in order to lay a new foundation, it would be a different foundation. And to do so there's going to be literally hell to pay if you do so in an errant fashion. Amen? Now some people are going to argue, how can you say that Gino wasn't sent by God? How can you say that God didn't send Gino? Well, my question is, how can you say that God didn't send me to tell Gino that he wasn't sent by God? I mean, it's a silly argument. All we have is the Scriptures. Two believers can disagree. And my opinion is no more valid than yours and yours is no more valid than mine. But if we disagree, then what is going to be the final authority on settling this dispute? It's got to be the Scriptures. And so I can't be emotional and say, well, the Lord sent me to do this, but it doesn't comport with Scriptures. And then say, well, who are you to tell me or one of my followers to say who are you to say that this man wasn't sent by God? Well, the Scriptures. He was not sent liking them to that. Now, in the sense that we were all were sent to spread the gospel. Okay, fine. And so if we all are sent that way, and if we all are these generic apostles, so to speak, then what benefit is it of you to call yourself an apostle? But let's be clear. He makes himself out to be a special type of an apostle. One of the things that you'll notice about Gino is he does kind of brag about himself. He does kind of lift himself up as though he is somebody special. I know they have never heard nothing like this. I get thousands of letters with that quote. About the dentist, I've never heard nothing like it. One man wrote me in his 80s. He said, I've been living 83 years. I've never heard a man like you. That's right. The only program that's over there to lead you to God the right way. Yes. Quite a work. Then these shall he do. Because I... Yes. I did more work than the Son of God. And I thank God that now I'm here. That's right. And some don't like the idea that I'm here, but God sent us. That's right. He sent us and gave us a divine skill. That's right. Just like he gave him the apostle Paul. That's it. Amen. Luke 11 and verse 49. What justifies my arrival. You also know how I became one. God appeared unto me. Amen. Hallelujah. God did. Hallelujah. I said, God Almighty appeared unto me. Amen. And spoke to me like you did, brother Paul. Yes. How is it that I'm able to go into the scripture to strip them down? That's right. As using fractions, break them down to the lowest common denominator. That's right. Wonderful. My divine skill was Godly given. But you question me about this God of heaven. That's right. You question me about his law. Amen. Pick up any subject you want to talk about in the Bible. That's right. And say if the God of heaven don't drop me in it, take it apart, split the atom and show you the nucleus of it. That's right. Wonderful. That's right. That's it. My skill is God given. I got it. I got it from God. That's right. That's right, sir. Only God himself can instill such boldness within a person. Just as concerning is Gino's lack of a belief in the Trinity or what is clear his oneness view, this modalism that he has observed. It's kind of hard to kind of pin him down on exactly what he believes. And so let's just be clear. If you do not believe that Jesus is God, you don't believe in who Jesus is, which means it's hard to believe that you are actually a believer because you're denying his actual identity. Is it required that you believe that he is God in order to be saved? Before we even look at that, let's just look and see is he God? We know Acts 1-8, God calls Jesus God. That ought to settle it. If God himself calls him God, well then he is God. And we see that God has shown up in the flesh in the past. The term is given to him angel, which doesn't mean that he's an angel like his angels of heaven, like Gabriel or Mark. No, in a sense, he's a messenger. It's just a title to give him. But we know that he's not any old messenger. He's not any old angel because in Genesis, when he speaks to Hagar, when he speaks to Balaam, when he speaks to Joshua, when he speaks to Gideon, when he speaks to Jacob, he's called God. He is identified as God. This is God who's speaking to us, so we see God take on flesh. And we see in the fiery next to this three that God is speaking through this burning bush, and so God takes on, not flesh at this moment, but takes on fire. So if he can wrap himself in fire, he can certainly wrap himself in flesh. He can come in a veiled glory just to be in our presence. And so in Exodus three, notice the terms that are given to God. He's called the Lord, the angel of the Lord and God. That's clear. But then he also says, when Moses says, who shall I say sent me? What does he say? I am. Remember that. We're going to cover that in just a second. But in John one, one, the Bible says in the beginning was the word. The word was with God and the word was God. And so what you'll notice in John one is says that and archa analogous, which is your English bears us out just the way it's written in the beginning was the word. Ky halagos ain prostantheon, which is and the word was crossed with God. That's exactly how your English says it. And so let's see what else it says. Ky pheos and halagos. That's if we were just to write it in word order in English, it would say and God was the word. But your English version says and the word was God. Why is that? Well, the reason why it's written differently and the reason why our English has the two flip-flop in the third portion is for this reason. The one thing that we have to identify is what is the subject and what is the predicate dominant. Because in this case, we have two nouns. Lagos word and theos God. So which one is the subject in this case? It's not. They asked us not God is a subject. Lagos is the subject. So what is they are stay us is what's called the predicate nominative. And in Greek the rules of grammar state that the predicate nominative describes what the subject is or what is classified as or under. So in this case, the word is classified as God. The word is God, which is why we say in English, our English translation say the word was God was with God in the word was God. And so if the word was God, did the word remain God? Well, surely no one says that is that the word used to be God, but it stopped being God. So it's clear that the word is God. And then we obviously read further in John and find out that this word is none other than Jesus. And so it's important to know that Jesus is God. It's important to understand the deity of Christ in order to be saved. Well, we know as we as we found out in Exodus that that God is also called the I am. And you've heard it spoken of over and over again about how Jesus is the I am. We know that the I am is taken as as as deity. We know that the son of man and son of God is also to be taken as God. When you say that you're saying I'm God. We know because the Jews accused Jesus because he says those things that you are being a mere man or calling yourself God. And Jesus didn't deny that because he is God. And so is it important? Is it necessary? Well, let's look at what John says in chapter eight verse 24. He says, I told you that you would die in your sins for unless you believe that I am, he will die in your sins. So unless you believe that I am, well, I am. What? Well, that's where the Greek comes in as well. Look over here. It says that in Garme, which is for this post positive. So for in May, which is unless, unless. Pistose Tehate, which is believe that ego and me. There it is the word ego in me, which is I am. And so he's saying that unless you believe that I am God, he says, you will die in your sins. So that part is clear. Unless you believe that he's the I am, that he is God. He says you will die in your sins. Do I think that a person needs to believe and understand all that there is that could be understood about this triumph? This is what we call the Trinity. Do I believe they need to understand that fully to become a believer? No, because who does you've got scholars that wrestle with how to make this fit. It's hard to explain who he is because he's God. He's not like anything that we've seen. And we know he's God because what is he doing in John 17? He's praying. Yeah, he's praying to the father because he's in a veiled form. Do not misunderstand his existence on earth in his earthly ministry as meaning that he is less than God and not God. He came in a veiled form in a form lower than angels. But he prays and says, Father, give me back the glory that I had with you in the beginning. We already know that God has not shared his glory and this glory that Jesus is warning back. He's wanting back because he had it when in the beginning. On top of those things that are also concerning is his belief in one water baptism to it has to be done verbally in the verbal name of Jesus. And then three, there must be this evidence of speaking in tongues. One thing that Gino doesn't understand is what it means to be in the name of Jesus would not give them a charge to go and baptize in my name and then have and then have them do so in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. And that if they didn't mean the same thing, then that would be a clear violation of what Jesus told them to do. And so do we have the apostles operating in error? No, because what Gino has not has failed to realize is that it's the same thing. And he doesn't mean to say this verbatim to give this verbal command, this verbal statement over someone being baptized. That is not what he's saying. The word of the term in my name or in the name of doesn't mean that I have to say in the name of this or that verbally. It means based on or on the authority of. So on the authority of what Christ has done because the word Anoma, which is what's used here. You'll see this phrase into Almighty or in Almighty to different variations. But based on his name or the word Anoma is the is the word for name or reputation or what a person has done or is doing. And so based on the authority, the name, the reputation of Jesus, which is the same as the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, then it means the same thing. It's not like Jesus did something, the Holy Spirit did something and the Father did something. They all did something separate. So it's what Jesus said to do. And then secondly, this is important is he's not talking about a physical baptism. That's not what's in play here. Remember, we are all going to be baptized into the Holy Spirit. Paul tells us so in 2 Corinthians 12 verse 13. And so every believer has been baptized into the body. Every believer, whether they've been a believer for one day, for one minute, for one hour, for one week, one year, one decade. We all have the Holy Spirit. We've all been baptized into that body or made a drink of that spirit, all of us. But then this issue of tongues, that's the part that's just as trouble. To make it as though these people have to speak in these languages. Although he takes it as an ecstatic, almost gibberish babbling that is not biblical because the word for tongues is the word for languages. And it always means a known language unless it's talking about the actual tongue in your mouth. And so we've got many verses that demonstrate that being a believer being saved did not come with them speaking in tongues. The Ethiopian eunuch, he didn't speak in tongues that we know of. Even in Acts 2 verses 40 through 47, we don't see that all the believers actually spoke in these languages. In Acts 13-12, the Procounsel, he didn't speak in tongues. Acts 13-48, they believed, but did they speak in tongues? We know they received the Holy Spirit, but they didn't speak in tongues. Acts 16-15, Lydia and her household. What about the jailer and his household? They didn't speak in tongues either. Did Paul speak in tongues? I mean the tongues that you think of, the one that no one knows. We know he spoke in languages because he says that in 1 Corinthians 14. We know he's an educated man, so we know he speaks in these different languages. But did he speak in languages? I'm not saying he did or didn't. But the point is, this very same Paul also asked the question and the way his phrase is that the obvious answer is no. Do all speak in tongues? Are all apostles or are all prophets? No. Do all speak in tongues? Do all have this gift or that gift? No. And so even Gino's understanding of tongues is off. Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! Hallelujah! a one of the things that I mentioned is early But one of the things that probably should have caught your attention. Maybe I know it caught mine and caught my wife's attention was Did you notice who was speaking in tongues? Who was catching the Holy Ghost? Did you notice who didn't catch the Holy Ghost who who was not speaking in tongues? The women and I don't know if that's some sort of rule. I don't know I'm just guessing out loud But is that some sort of rule where the men catching the women? I've never been to a Pentecostal church a charismatic church where the women set steel while the men caught the Holy Spirit I've never as a matter of fact You're almost always going to see a woman so-called catch it before the men or definitely you'll see more of them But in this case, I'm just wondering That may speak to the level of control that he has Over the services and how he demands service to be done and that maybe he does require the women to keep silent Literally keep silent and that's not saying that I support women Leading men in service. No, but they can't utter a word see one of the hallmarks of a Mature believer and certainly of someone who's leading a body It's got to be maturity not just in the word That's a given you must be mature in the word But also in just the way you comport yourself the way you act And so to let loose and have this uncontrollable outburst and so-called in the spirit I think that's unbiblical but also Laying that aside even when he has debated people how he's just really lost control. He has this He has this almost childish bullying behavior My question you better not know How many did Jesus Jesus Did he preach 10 I'm not a horse. Don't tell me the whole Can I speak get your chapter? Can I speak talk Bible? Can I speak talk Bible? Can I speak talk Bible? Can I speak all your chapter? Can I speak prove that women is older than the word and women can wear makeup back up the two lies That's on the floor. Yeah, I need time to speak speak that we've been wasting time on Vegas We don't want you lying mouth. I know your style. I know your style It's all I know your style the word either the big passage in is or sit down Hold on hold on be a man. Hold on hold on hold on So you okay or sit out you as the pastor you need to control your sheep debate You need to control your sheep a man. Let me speak. I'll sit out. Let me speak Let me sit out. Let me speak the bait Like a real let me know when you sit out Let me know when you finish if you don't a lie if you don't allow me to speak told a lie I want to speak. I want to speak. I don't want your mouth. No, no what I want to say What I want to say is I want Bible you got a one Bible sir. You're leading. I won't buy you are leading sheep I won't buy you're leading sheep. I won't buy you feel the bike. No We like to finish the time of the Smith. We like to finish the text sir. Just a minute So much so that he will not let you finish or say what you want to say unless you say it the way he does it Which brings me to this people have stated before and I listen I've done this I've offered Request has not been accepted and so I'm good with that as a matter of fact. I doubt he would but I People have said why don't you debate him be a man and go debate him Which is them with that that whole bravado be a man and go debate him Well, tell him to be a man and accept my debate, but he won't which is fine I don't think that that's him not accepting my debate is not being a man now one I would never be so silly as to bait him On his home turf in his church with his own personal moderator there that would never happen It would be something where it's just he and I alone having our own Bible We're reading ourselves and have a discussion with the word, but he's already stated he would not debate someone like me He wants someone as he as he says a whale, you know, I don't debate everybody And the reason why I don't debate everybody a lot of these men don't want to be right They just want to make a name for themselves off the popularity of the platform of the truth of God And a lot of them is mad because we won't let them use our platform So I'm just not interested in everybody. I don't want little tadpole a little Microcosic things in water that you can't even see I I want whales So I can harpoon them Them that's affecting the masses of people. Are you getting what I'm telling you? I Want kings and queens Big false prophets so I can scale you. Hey man, you little pulpit parasites Need a magnifying glass to just see your level of falseness My question is when I go and look at the different debates these had first of all, you've never debated a well yourself You want to debate a whale? I get you think that someone wants to make their name off of you Okay, fine, but are you now also wanting to make your name off of somebody that's bigger than you? More folks know TD jakes then that they know you more folks know creflor dollars and they know you But okay fine, you want to you want to as you say harpoon the big whales But again, you never debated one of those in the first place and then that Caused us to look at who have you debated? G knows only debated people who are suspect in the word to begin with you debate a rossin fire Rossifarian rapper you debate a person who is gay and who wants to defend homosexuality trying to use the Bible You debate a Hebrew-Israelite you debate people in the nation of Islam You you debate other Muslims You debate a novice in the Bible who even says that he's just learning this thing trying to get his feet wet Well, where's the debate that you've had with someone who was clearly strong in the Bible whether you disagree with him or not Where is that debate at? See what we can't do is allow a person say that that I am this and I am that but I can't be a touch I can't be touched or approached by anyone that no one can call him out now This is what he says You can't come face the truth of God with Hebrew Greek and Latin only thing work here is Bible Bible work here your Hebrew Greek and Latin is good But brother it don't help you here But see the problem is you know It is an issue when you don't know the language when you tell a person that Hebrew Greek and I don't know why you said Latin is not a lot latin's not in the Bible But when you make these statements, no Only Bible well your Bible is Bible because of Hebrew Greek and Aramaic so you don't have it without that and it would make sense I believe that a pastor especially one at your level should have some familiarity with Hebrew and Greek You just should that way some of these mistakes that you make you wouldn't make these mistakes Paul did not write the book of Rome. Let me show you who wrote it. I'm in chapter 16 and verse 22 I Tortillious wrote this epistle who wrote this epistle solution in the Lord solution the Lord. No One that wrote the book of Romans was a man named Tortilla and so anyone can tell you that yeah, that's not a big deal in terms of Paul not physically pinning Romans or other epistles that was custom in many cases for someone else to do so Maybe because a person has poor eyesight or their hands or what have you but you would have their own personal scribes Who would write for them on their behalf? But still you would attribute that to Paul or anyone else doing that same thing as them writing it when a person writes a book Oftentimes there's something or someone else is actually pinning it pinning it for them. It may be that you're typing it Okay, fine, but it now what happens is it goes to the editor? The editor kind of makes some changes some some some grammatical issues are there But you're still known as the writer. These are still your words and so to make this statement Okay, fine I won't harp too much on that but it just goes to show that you should know better than that make this as a point and that's where the benefit of actually being trained comes in because if you start off you got a lot of energy a lot of Emotion a lot of sale you got a Bible and just because you've been doing it for 10 20 30 years That mean you've been doing it for 10 20 30 years the right way And so now you get entrenched in what you've been doing it because you've seen some results You top the number of baptisms the number of folks that come to the church and folks that are listening. Well, is that really? Indicator is that really a true indicator of legitimate fruits because if that's the case Then so too can people in the Mormon church tout that the Jehovah's Witness certainly the nation of Islam or or Muslims in general That's not a really key indicator It's really how you govern yourself with the scriptures and how you understand and use the scriptures So the question is is Gino Jennings an actual Christian? I would say it's hard to believe so based on his doctrinal issues how he handles his belief in Jesus as being God Now it could be that he may believe that he is God and so forth, but he has a kind of off understanding of the Trinity or of Jesus he's made the statement that he thinks that we believe in three gods I don't know who believes in three guys no Christian no person believes in the Trinity believes in the three gods Which is also Speaks to his level of understanding when it comes to these issues to not intentionally misrepresent the the belief but to Unknowingly misrepresented because you just don't know what these people believe after all and so what's gonna happen after this? Well, his his defenders are going to attack me. I don't know the Lord. I'm this I'm that name calling Like it's always been done. I get that This wasn't necessarily directed at you to begin with those who are going to respond that way But to those who just wondering those who are looking because most people don't go to his church Most people don't watch him a lot Some do and so those who are looking at him thinking that that might be acceptable because he's given some good valid points on Some of these social issues concerning homosexuality and transgender and men and women and so forth. Well, even Atheists have some of these views even people who are Muslims Hebrew Israelites and and nation of Islam and and all these other groups they have these same views So that doesn't mean anything it's the scriptures And so for you who are looking to grow and to understand the scriptures better You're the one who I'm talking to not the person's gonna come in come comment with some vile responses That's fine. You are free to do so you are more than free to do so It's gonna it's gonna demonstrate the actual spirit. That's in you when you comment in an ungodly fashion Don't say that that's guy that caused you to do that Don't say that and all you're doing is you're mimicking the person where you got it from Geno genics and so for the geno genics if he were to hear this if he were to say that All his doctrine is correct that it's right and that he is a true apostle Well, genome