 Good afternoon. Thank you very much for the opportunity to speak and just a short commercial break. This is my book about the role. Mainly about the reaction of Europeans to Ron Paul, also about his campaign, but unfortunately he's in German, but here it is, it's over there. I'm going to talk about the European reactions, Ron Paul can I know. Three points I'm going to make. There's a mirror of the development in the USA, there's the digital nation, the emerging digital nation and the changing image of America in Europe. Now, about the mirror of the development in the US, so in many ways the European reaction to Ron Paul happened to America in a small way. If anything, the European mainstream media treated him worse than the American mainstream media. They hardly registered him and when they did, in half a sentence also, they usually dismissed him as some kind of crash. The German magazine called him a court jester. They paid him, they called him a laughing stock. And there were some very few respectful of local articles or quantities, but they were the exception to one of them was Stuyardus in Rihondo in the middle of Darwin. And these exceptions, most of them came only after the primaries had been done and they were coming here, was no immediate threat to the establishment. And the European television coverage was even worse, it was practically non-existent. But wherever you want to mention, and wherever you can commentaries were possible or on the website, the very kind of portion of these comments mentioned Ron Paul favorably and complained that he would be badly treated. Thus, again, burglary, the developments in America, because of the internet, mainstream media blackout has not stopped thousands of diverse and very dedicated Europeans from rallying to the congressman and his freedom message. So from the Ron Paul Europe.net website 11, there are linked 30 European blogs dedicated to the Ron Paul revolution, here are some of them. And these are the dedicated blogs only, not including in this general read in the terium, minded blogs and websites not specifically dedicated to Ron Paul, but which report our comment on him and his movement regularly. Ben Hillback, an American who lives in and works in Slovakia, and who is the administrator of the Google group, Europeans for Ron Paul, told me recently, and I quote, And the number of Ron Paul websites in Europe, which are not in English, is astonishing. Obviously, these are not end up in Europeans, but rather carrying the Ron Paul message to Europeans. I have seen websites in a European, Polish, Hungarian, Croatian, or Portuguese, French, German, Spanish, Norwegian, etc. This to me is an astonishing development, not since the communists had inflammation in every country and language has such a pin that hurt and hurt. This leads me to the second point, the digital nation. These blogs and websites together about 30 European Ron Paul media groups have served to connect like-minded, freedom-loving people, crossing borders on language barriers, ethnicities, philosophies, and creeds, to form the core of what Jay Roberts in an article on Google.com has called a digital nation. The digital nation is a cluster of people independent of their geographical location. Networking for a common cause, and in this case for the establishment of a true individual freedom, no matter where they live, they inform each other, help each other, learn from each other, and they are quite the same. That's the establishment institution. The media, the schools, the parliament, the political parties, they are quite literally out of control. Jay Roberts has heard, and I quote, the fact that the first digital nation formed around Ron Paul as a cause rather than Ghana, or Bahrain, or France, perhaps there is a good level of education that perhaps digital nations will tend towards libertarian friendly. The most striking result of this digital network in the Ron Paul in Europe was the small but significant event of the Strasbourg Tea Party. You will all be familiar with last year's Boston Tea Party, my mom, when the record-breaking $6 million was donated to the campaign in just 24 hours on the 7th, 16th. You will probably also know that it was organized very independent from the official campaign, and is thus a further indication of emerging digital nation. Anyway, on that same day, in solidarity with the Ron Paul revolution, about 30 Europeans converged in front of the European Parliament in Strasbourg. Some pressed up the North Indians and the Taddaq Tea in the Rhine to celebrate their hero and to just have some fun talking and being together. This event shows two things. One, a high level of understanding of the issues at stake, the issues at stake being the increasing similar decentralization of power and the transfer of power to international bodies like the European Union. And two, it shows that Europeans are beginning to learn what America historically has meant to mankind and who still means mankind in the future. This brings me to the last point I would like to make. The changing image of America in Europe. Since the Second World War, the feelings Europeans, at least Western Europeans, have towards America can be characterized as manic oppressive. On the one hand, America is hailed as a great liberator from Nazi oppression, and up to 1980 denied at least as a great protector against the Soviet threat. Also as a provider of seemingly unlimited prosperity and seemingly unlimited freedom. But on the other hand, the cultural influence of the United States was felt as well empowering. America was able to see that the superpower exerted in Germany on the rest of the world, powerfully imposing its will on its way to life and other people. This is an illustration in 1972, we get to get down to war. Basically it was the conservative of the mind of people like the fact that soldiers of America were protecting them from the East, but they do like the cultural influence, the libertinism of the rock and roll and everything. And the left-wing people, they had the cultural influence, so basically on both sides, the schizophrenic split. So both these images of the freedom bringer and the oppressor convey some truth, but neither of these images convey the whole truth. So together they do not harmonize and they do not fit together. There is something missing in the picture, something is wrong. And in the meantime, however, they have formed a somewhat schizophrenic image and it has generated an unhealthy, love-hate relationship that Europeans feel towards the US today. In light of this fact, you know, one was achieved an amazing feat. He hasn't also achieved many amazing feat, but I want to add to this list of achievements that have that as a result of his candidacy. He has laid the foundations for a fundamental convalescence in the perception of the United States of Europe and probably worldwide. He has helped men to overcome the massive view of America as a country by reintroducing to the world the view of America as an idea. Some may call it the American dream, I prefer the term idea because ideas can be rational whereas dreams are literally rational. And the American idea is that individual freedom is the best and greatest hope for mankind. It was a book by the Lane who, in a 1943, wrote in her book, The Discovery Freedom, that the American Revolution was the impact of a world revolution. Although that's not the world, that there's ever a world that man is free. And that it was an ongoing revolution against the forces of oppression over the world. This led to two conclusions, one right and one wrong in my view. The wrong conclusion was that the American entry into the Second World War was to be supported on the grounds that it was a continuation of this revolution. It was a wrong conclusion because by 1943, the those in power in Washington were already visibly dismantling the Constitution and planning to abolish personal freedoms. Lane's right conclusion was that Marxism and Socialism, including National Socialism, were an impact counter revolutions against the historic rise of individual freedom, the freedom caused mainly by the existence of the United States at its constitution. Lane's mistake was to overlook the fact that by 1943, the counter revolution really was a wave in power in Washington. In our day and age, this counter revolution has almost completely succeeded. The American Constitution is now widely known by those in power. They therefore feel free to do the thick leaves at home and abroad. The important part of this counter revolution has been the systematic removal or true knowledge of American history and the philosophy of liberty from the school and university textbooks and classrooms and from the mass media, probably in America or Europe as well. It is in the resulting intellectual desert that the magnificent view of America could flourish. Therefore, in the 20th century, America was living with the unimage-beating life of freedom. But now, 12 months of wrongful campaign and wrongful revolution estimated 4 to 20,000 people in Europe have learned for the first time in their lives the true history of American revolution and the philosophy behind it. I'll quickly explain how I come to this. I'm going to make a statistic set for magic number 30. But first let me tell you this. Out of 100 people concerned about any issue, it's a general rule from one rights letter that's issued to the politician. That is the 2018 rule, 20% or 27, 20% of people in the church. That's the one person. Going to Strasbourg is an even higher level of commitment. So I'll take another factor in 20% in there. So that's 0.16%. There are 30 people in Strasbourg, 30 wrongful wrongs in Europe, 30 wrongful meetup. So 30 seems to be quite a bad number there. There they are, 30 meetup groups. Do you want to see that again? Sorry, I can't say anything to that. So if 30 is 0.16%, then 100% is 18,750. And if 30 is only 0.8%, then we have 100% is 20,750. So that is people including everyone who is in a local commitment, but in general supported or wrongful in Europe. And if you take the one statistic we do know, from a statistic is 1 million votes in America, in the primaries out of, I don't know, 200 million people eligible voting, which is a higher percentage in Europe than about 20,400,500 million Europeans. Any million. So it's how our learning between the spirit of American Revolution, the learning that there was a white knight in shining armor, and that the paper money inflation and business cycles are not some mutual acts of life. They are hearing about an Austrian school of economics and that government intervention always leads to unintended consequences, calling for a more intervention. This is all stuff that wrongful has been talking about. You can see on YouTube. They are learning that we have to reverse this trend. They are learning that the US participation in the First World War was detrimental to freedom in Europe. And above all, however, they are learning that there is another meaning to America than that or a big country which is throwing its weight around and ordering people to be free. They are learning that America is above all an idea and they like this idea. And crucially, they feel emboldened by the example of wrongful to actually fight for the realization of this idea of her. I predict that the European branch of the wrongful Revolution, the sort of wrongful digital nation, just like the American branch, is going to keep on growing until the 2008 presidential campaign is over. At this point in time, however, it is difficult to see what concrete changes people bring about in Europe and when they will happen. But one more thing, sir. From now on, the powers that we have will have a persistent and ever-growing thought in their side. And given the decentralized nature of the internet, it will need the creation of a world of government to actually pull this form out. Now, this may actually happen, a world of government, but if anything is to stop it, I predict that the world of one wrongful digital nation or its successor will play a major role in reversing the trend toward world government back towards the decentralized and free world. That is it.