 The 2017 Nobel Prize in Medicine was awarded for elucidating the molecular mechanisms of our internal circadian clock. For billions of years, life on Earth evolved on a 24-hour cycle of light and dark. So it's no surprise our bodies are finally tuned to that pattern. But put people in total darkness without any external time queues and our bodies still continue to cycle in about a 24-hour circadian rhythm. In fact, you can even take tissue biopsies from people and show the cells continue to cycle outside the body in a petri dish. Nearly every tissue and organ in our body has its own internal clock. An intricate system of intrinsic clocks drive not only some of our behavioral patterns, such as eating, fasting, sleeping, and wakefulness, but our internal physiology, our body temperature, blood pressure, hormone production, digestion, and immune activity. Most of the genes in our body exhibit daily fluctuations in expression, making the circadian rhythm the largest known regulatory system in the body. This cycle is thought to allow for a level of predictability and functional division of labor so that each of our body processes can run at the best time. At night while we're sleeping, a whole array of internal housekeeping activities can be switched on, for example, and as dawn approaches our body can shift back into activity mode. Anyone who's ever had jet lag knows what throwing our cycle, even just a few hours off can do, but now we know our circadian rhythms can literally be the difference between life and death. A study of more than 14,000 self-poisonings found that those who tried committing suicide in the morning were more than twice as likely to die than those who ingested the same dose in the evening, in the same vein, properly timed chemotherapy can only end up being five times less toxic, but also twice as effective against cancer. The same drugs, the same dose, but different effects depending on the time that they were given. Our body absorbs, distributes, metabolizes, and eliminates what we ingest differently depending on when it is during the 24-hour cycle, we're just beginning to figure out the optimal timing for different medications, randomize people suffering from hypertension into taking their blood pressure pills at bedtime instead of in the morning. Not only does the bedtime group achieve better blood pressure control and suffer fewer heart attacks and strokes, but cuts their risk of death in half. Yet most physicians and pharmacists tell patients to take them in the morning potentially doubling their risk of death. If chronotherapy, the optimal timing of drugs, can have such an impact, maybe it should come as no surprise that chrono-prevention, the scheduling of lifestyle interventions like meal times, can also make a difference. In the official Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics position paper on effective treatments for obesity, importance is placed not only on the quantity, but timing of calorie intake, suggesting that consuming more calories earlier in the day rather than later in the day can assist with weight management. Some have gone further and even characterized obesity as a chronobiological disease. What evidence do we have to back up these kinds of claims? Well, the timing of calorie intake may have shifted slightly over the last few decades towards a greater proportion of foods later in the day, which raised the question about a possible role in the rise of obesity. Middle-aged men and women who had a greater share of daily calories in the morning do seem to gain less weight over time, and a study entitled, Timing of Food Intake Predicts Weight Loss Effectiveness found that dieters eating their main meal earlier in the day seemed to steadily lose more weight than those eating their main meal later. The obvious explanation for these findings would just be that those who eat later also tend to eat more, and there does seem to be a relationship between when people eat most of their calorie intake and how many calories they end up eating over the entire day, with those eating a greater proportion in the morning, eating less overall. Maybe later eaters are just overeating junk on the couch, watching primetime TV. A tendency has been found from night owls to eat more fast food, soda, fewer fruits and vegetables. In the field of social psychology, there's a controversial concept called ego depletion, where self-control is viewed as a limited resource like a muscle that can become fatigued from overuse, as the day wears on, the ability to resist unhealthy food choices may decline, leaving one vulnerable to temptation. So, I mean, is it just a matter of later eating, leading to greater eating? Remember this study where earlier eaters steadily lost more weight? To their surprise, the early eaters were eating as much as the late eaters, despite the difference in weight loss magnitude. The early eaters ended up about five pounds lighter than the late eaters by the end of the 20-week study, even though they were apparently eating the same amount of food. There didn't seem to be any difference in physical activity between the two groups, either. Could it be that just the timing itself of calorie intake matters? Scientists decided to put it to the test, which we'll cover next.