 రానిను గానినినిటినిని. కొటమార్టోని. కొటోనుల్టికి. ప్రకునినికత్ కొటర్. మిసరికంకిలి, ఇదిటిటని మానేరియం ప్రంతికికి. మిమినే జజ జజజజ జజజజజజ੭੮੸੸ੜ੸੥੯ జజజజజజ, జజజజజజజజ੭ੜੲ੮ੱੰజజజజజజ੥੸੥੥੤੾ੰజజ রकੜੱੱੱ੯ੱੲੱ੺ੱ੷੨੨੥ੱ੾੮੤੤੤੨੠ੲੱੱੳ� Ashkan  cerv   encant d క్నరరాఀానికెన్ని మనికేరా. కేనినిమనికా. మనిమరానికెని మనికరికం 잠깐 20 మనికానికానాకెరికిచి మనినికికి. మండికండికా. ఎటిన్రండి 30% క్ల్ల్ఢి మోఆలిండించి దరండిక్లాఖె. ఇటింనికే ఇటండిక్లాకి కిండికో కిక్రికాడిఎండి . ڈیلیک last year I used participative method of data collection analysis and like a focus group discussion key information interview and I have also used my personal experience. as I worked for 10 years in DFI TV UK supported live within forest program. Finding and discussions. Community experience of climate change and its impact on well-being, as వమినంవర్చన౨ికాలొ్యటిందానంటి. మనుసిసానియాత౰ి. వడినింటాత౰ింటిని బంటికధికి కలె నింటుకిటాత౰ాి. ఎటిందాన్నికి కికాకి. నినిందాక్న్యునినినిక్నినిిచిచ్ని అర్ప్సకారారి. నినిచిమిసకన్సకారికునారికి ఆందిని. బార్టా నునెచింట్రు。 సేవార్ల్చతిఎరరు నురినుఱటినంటులకి, మటికి నురుకినాణినికా హిట్ర్టకంటు.  Unreal షాశిక నావారం తాకిఎల౿ కావికారిక నిపాసి ఎపామోని కిలి మాసికాసిక నికిటకాకిక నిక౿కికిక స్మనికి టావాసి నికికిక కిక౿కి మాకికering system particularly rich people change their farming system from traditional subsistence farming to but poor people just shifted their time of farming. Fencing forest boundary and provision of entry, migration, reducing the number of cattle. As the forest decreased, they reduced their number of cattle. We find that around 50% of reduction of their cattle. After community forest, they have some sort of planned adaptation practice. They are preparing adaptation plan. In my study area, there are three types of adaptation plan. Community level adaptation plan, local adaptation plan and area level adaptation plan. In community level, they follow some sort of process. We have 75 districts. Within the district, there are many village development committees. Within the village development committee, there are so many settlements. We say war. This community-based adaptation plan starts from war level. In settlement area, they do meeting, mass assembly. They identify hotspot area, maybe locational hotspot area and maybe vulnerable people. Then they prepare community level plan. They prepare KAPA adaptation fund. This community level adaptation plan mobilizes the adaptation fund. They have some sort of system of adaptation fund and they implement. They prepare local level plan, like local adaptation plan for action. They also manage adaptation fund, district level planning. During district level planning, they identify the stakeholders who can support to their plan. They allocate resource, regional level planning. From regional level planning, it goes to the national level plan. Implementation of adaptation plan. To implement the plan, they prepare. They have established the community adaptation fund at VDC and CFUG level. Village development committee level and community forestry user group level. They have an adaptation fund. And linkage of adaptation plan with ongoing CFUG activities. They have on sort of activities through the community forestry user group. They link this adaptation plan with ongoing community forestry user group activity. Inclusion of adaptation activity VDC plan to derive government fund. Village development committee is the lowest body of government body, lowest political unit. They have some sort of financial mechanism through government. And this community forestry user group includes their adaptation plan to the process of village development committee plan. And capacity building of the team members and team N members. These are the mechanism they flow to implement their adaptation plan activities. Major activities implemented through the community forestry fund. They expect at least 25% of their total fund for forest management activities. Like forest fire line preparation, operational plan preparation, thinning and pruning. Technical side of forest management. And at least 35% of total fund they expect for poor focus activities. Like good in keeping forestry based enterprise, scholarship, health program. And equitable forest product distribution system. Building road, schools, community building, mobilization of user groups for capacity building and hazard incidents. They have some sort of money they allocate for hazard incidents like emergency fund. Strength of this plan adaptation mechanism. It is suitable mechanism for plan decentralize cost effective linked and inclusive adaptation mechanism. Like it's flow, the bottom of planning process involve all sort of people. So we say that it is very effective mechanism. The groups provide resource including opportunity of income to the most vulnerable section of the group to adapt with negative impact of climate change. It support the vulnerable group who identify during the adaptation plan preparation process. And they support to raise the income, income of the most vulnerable section which support to adapt negative impact of climate change. Community forest users who are providing platform for organization, information dissemination, social capital development of the marginal communities. Particularly it increase the collective actions or collective campaign against the climate change incidents. Like information sharing and collective effort to minimize the negative effect of climate change incidents. And CFS are entry point for wider service delivery. Most of the state, local government, NGOs and market institution working with the group in the area. Community forest user group are not only implementing the forest based activities. They are very wider, they are implementing wider activities and other service provider. Service provider from other parts also support community forest user group to implement different kind of activities. And various to adaptation, membership exclusion, to be a member of community forest user group, there are some sort of criteria. But member who are included within a community forest user group have opportunity to benefit from adaptation activities. But who are excluded, they have no opportunity. Exclusion and decision making process particularly dominated by local elite to decide the fund mobilization. Restriction on forest products extraction. Particularly there is some sort of restriction to harvest or use of medicinal plant or like some sort of tree on which forest dependent people drip their livelihoods. BDC and word debate, political and forest debate, diverse growing stock. So in Nepal there is no exact size of community forest that will be handed over to local community. It depends upon the local situation. So there is diversity and fund expenditure in non-climatic activities. Climate adaptation fund are also implemented or expanded in other activities. Synergy between community forest and mitigation. These are the adaptation part and I am also trying to link between the community forest and mitigation particular rate mechanism. Community forestry contributed to increase the Nepal's forest stock, controlling grazing, making fire line, plantation. Established mechanism of benefit sharing. Red and red PS mechanism can contribute to rural development and poverty reduction. Incorporating a strong adaptation element can promote more proper and people-centered rate. Potential gap and conflict between adaptation, community forestry and red. Political problem. Major political parties have hidden interest to capture the resource and decision making problem. When fund come, major political parties have hidden interest to capture the like body decision making body. High value timber forest is a high opportunity cost because they can earn much money from selling timber outside in market. So why they can protect the forest. Program of landlessness, issue of land tenure, capacity of local leaders. These are the major issues between community forestry and red. Our way forward for Nepal. Community forestry approach needs to manage team in the process of constitution and operational plan preparation and the bottom up planning process. Because community forestry user group made two types of document. One is constitution which mobilized the people and another is operational plan which manage the forest. So this process needs to manage team through the policy. The role of CFG should be linked with source of credit and low interest rent. Community forestry group needs to recognize as a financial institution. Climate and Sensitivity Forest Management Guidelines needs to develop and linked with DFO, District Forest Office and National Level Forestry activities. There is a value in exploring PES and carbon market more broadly than strictly red. I think community forestry may exert fruitful result if it goes through the non-market mechanism. Like voluntary mechanism. Thank you very much.