 Kiyako asks, can you explain how to debate reject need to help the poor they need health care and Altruistic moral code that left is always being up in debates. I mean, I think you have to challenge it face-on I don't need to help the poor the poor can help themselves. I Don't they don't need Health care to be provided to them They can take care of their own health care. I for one believe that poor people have the capacity to take care of themselves have the capacity to provide health care for themselves if we get out of the way Your focus as an individual out there Is to live your life the best to the best of your ability the best life you can live That is true. That is just as true for poor people and What poor people need just like we need is the freedom to do that and to give people the freedom to do that We need to deregulate health care to give people the freedom to do that poor people the freedom to do that We need to get rid of the minimum wage to get people poor people the freedom to do that We need to get rid of business regulations to give people poor people the freedom to do it. We need The state to do what it's supposed to do which is protect individual rights and otherwise leave us alone And if that happens, then the opportunities that the poor face are immense and their lives will be better off to the extent that they take on the more responsibility of making their lives good lives. That is a reframing of the debate, away from altruism, away from my responsibility to them. Now if you want to shift the debate to altruism, you can ask why? Why do I need to help the poor? I need to help myself. I need to help my kids. I need to help those who I love and I care for. I need to take care of my life. You know, and you can shift the debate to a moral debate about what should your focus be. But you can orient the political debate in a way that is egoistic without having to delve into the theory of morality. Although that might be your purpose and that would be fine.