 I'm Andrew Norton, I'm directly by ideas for a pleasure to be here. Many thanks to everyone. I think this is the fourth thing you see that is being had at the trots. It's been really good, and there's also a sense of building knowledge, accumulating knowledge, building whatever, a computer that can work together. I feel more than it can with the others in the two of these things as well. So that's the main thing for tomorrow. Now, this session was originally asked for new reflections. Didn't really feel like that because I've seen about 13, 14% of what's going on today. So I thought instead that we would try to gather together some thoughts and take the bits to tomorrow and join on everyone's experience in the room after the day. So this is very simple, two questions. Think of one of the things that I've resumed to do in comparison, lived experience of local knowledge, transparency, and now we have to go to the place for financing and application management risks. So one of those things are one of the tracks for the two days. And address these two questions, and I want you to think about these for about 40 minutes and then we'll gather in a few thoughts. And if you have other thoughts, you can give them to Claire, who's up there, and we'll take them into tomorrow. So this is particularly the second question. What are the intractable, wiki-potty problems that are at the back of your mind and thinking, well, this is tomorrow, but what are those? What can we take into tomorrow and think about and move this forward? So two things, though. Is there a stand-out lesson? Something you can apply in your work, something useful, something you've heard, you know, wow, that's really useful. I should capture that and think about it. What's the stand-out lesson? But something applicable, something practical. And the second question, what should we be challenging ourselves to solve tomorrow? Again, if you could make one of the things and think about those two, and take about five minutes and think of something, and we'll just do show-cans afterwards. We'll gather in any other audience that we don't get to. So if you could take five minutes and think about those two questions. Who wants to pick out one or two either lessons or challenges to solve tomorrow but make it clear which it is you're saying? Pablo. Sorry, it was my voice. My voice, you don't understand me. Mostly because of something that Noel said that then materialized in the theatre of the oppressed session. But I was really struck that empowerment sounds like you lack power, we can give you power. Let's give you power. But instead, there seems to be like the protesters not being anomaly to Poland. There are people who already have the ability to manifest their abilities, including power. There is a process of the liberty trying to remove the power from them to disempower. And what we need to do is to un-disempower to remove the barriers. I don't know what we're going to come up with, but I keep speaking to some more like a form of activism that our community doesn't feel comfortable with. So we need to challenge ourselves. How can we recognise that it's becoming a different beast? So recognising the laws changing that our technocratic languages that we apply to something like power are rapidly becoming something like that. What do we do about that? That's great. Thanks for that. Any other thoughts on resilience through empowerment? Either things you lessen to take away or challenges to think about in the later part or to address in the later part? I mean, I sort of tell a lot of people saying I think there were powers really important. I think this... Maybe if we come now with the GNC days to a position where we're wondering... Well, I'm just wondering, having been to the previous ones a while ago, thinking what position... What role does this group play? And I was thinking about how Celine used to say, well, hang on, what we're saying in this room is not making it to the ears of the negotiators. But I'm wondering now if we're actually the right ones to be speaking to negotiators and whether we're sort of an elite here with power and can be thinking because we have knowledge. And how do we position ourselves as a means that people who are empowered on the ground don't get to speak and don't have the voices and get to come to the cause? So, again, it's happening to work with the way the world is changing to a way in terms of acquisition as a group who work on these things and no one describes it as an elite but certainly as a technical group working around these things and community. Great, thanks very much. I'm going to move to the second one now. The value for the living experience and local knowledge. Again, either a take-away lesson that you can apply in your work or a really knotty problem that you want us to come back to tomorrow. This is the living experience track. Thank you. We had an interesting discussion in the last session about local knowledge and participation and how actually participation is done is incredibly important. It's incredibly difficult to get a right. It shouldn't be a box-keeping exercise but the process of participation itself can also be very disempowering. People have to stand up, people have to put their views forward and they might be incastigated with their names but they'll talk to it possibly in the field. So we have to deal with that and issue very carefully. Yeah, it's in the sound-space area that the world is changing and the way that's faced for free expression is causing that really rapidly in a lot of lessons in every way. I'm using sound-space to think about something to think about in terms of how we think about it. So again, a challenge to come back to tomorrow, I think. Well, I'm moving now transparency and downward accountability. Again, I think all the other discussions in that area have also been linked to finding a potential answer in this. But again, either a lesson or a challenge to come back to tomorrow. Selin. I thought that was an excellent session particularly to focus on downward accountability. My sense is that perhaps we are confining ourselves too much to be monitoring and evaluation as a technocratic mobility and not enough emphasis on learning as a very, very important part which is from the bottom up. It is people actually doing things learning by doing that. We from outside try and evaluate but don't value their knowledge and I think it's a challenge to us to do that. And if I might also reflect on the conversation we have on the power bank, I think in a very, very real sense the Paris Agreement has actually disempowered the negotiators and empowered us here. We are not the actors. We can implement the Paris Agreement. We don't need their permission. We don't need their words and text. It doesn't matter what they write or what they agree. It's agreed. The implementation is agreed. We are the implementers. We can just go ahead and forge the agreement, the Paris Agreement implementation ourselves and don't think we must influence the negotiators. Let's forget about that. Thank you. Anyone else with some thoughts on transparency and accountability? I mean, a lot of what we're getting is in a very similar space. It's about the world is changing and agency is we're seeing it much more in different places coming from the bottom up. There are still risks on these huge risks and political challenges in the world. OK. Finally, on financing adaptation and managing risk. Who wants to have a go at either and take away some more and challenge for tomorrow? Thanks a lot. In fact, I was asking all green on board especially the private sector and when you look at the case for Africa, adaptation is a priority. Something is happening at the community level. Communities are engaging in terms of doing business also to facilitate on income. But in this room, if I ask and watch the case for especially the case for Nepal as a good case, how do we bring on board the medium and small media enterprises and microfinancing institutions which are growing especially in developing countries to invest in adaptation strategies? That is something that is not found out. The solution that is not found out can come really tell us as African Center for Technology Studies in Kenya. We are coordinating the Africa National Climate Action Network to provide an opportunity for the private sector and the CPUs and universities and some national governments to come and dialogue. So how do we really support them to understand what is needed advancing climate funding to the coming best initiatives? Thank you. Thanks very much. That was something in the finance sessions that I was in playing up a lot. Bringing together finding ways of integrating the studies into climate adaptation action. So thank you very much for that. I guess you have to forgive me to see days kind of words but in the two sessions that I was in on data and also on risk and peace building and conflict areas the kind of threads that went through both of those were actually about being creative and being accessible and listening. So I think it was kind of talking to people on the ground talking to people who were working on the talk acknowledging their complexities and discussions and be accessible and accept that there are differences but we have to kind of come to not agreement but discussion on going. Feel free to disagree with me at anybody that's in one session. Thanks very much. Just a final thought from me coming back to my discussions earlier in the day of Dana Roberts really focus and thoughtful and careful presentation of the main findings of the Model 5 report this deviant really into these key areas the most important thing she said was this step change or transformational transition in basically lowering issues rapidly in urban infrastructure land energy and the before areas but then there was clear points as well about the step change that we need from business as usual in relation to the resilience is bringing development and climate action together in the adaptation space I mean my sense from the development of this community is that there is something that comes together every year that's valuable that brings thoughts together that does build knowledge and each year you get a sense of knowledge and humanity and of solutions being found and improvements being made in the way we work so my ask for tomorrow would be to think about can we do something to make that step change more material and more real by thinking about maintaining the kind of communication that we get in this community once a year through the year so that would be my problem or my issue or challenge to take into tomorrow thank you all very much