 Now if I've got myself a set a P790s of old in the bag right now, there's only one question on my mind and that's hourly compared to the P790s of 2019. And that's exactly what we'll find out today here at Fullgolchester. Yeah. P790s 2019. Literally just released. If you haven't already then please check out my full review at that club which was done yn y dŵr, rhai greu ar y cwmwyllio yn y 4 golll, ac yna yw'n dŵr, yn y Fawr, yn y Cymru. Ond y cwestiwn wedi bod yn ystod, ar y cwmwyllio yn y cwmwyllio, hefyd, rwy'n ei ddim yn rhaid i'r ffantastig iawn. Ond bod y gweithio'r fawr, yn ystod, eisiau'n teimlo i'r sianigau P790r, a'u gwneud o wneud o'r defnyddio'r llyfrans, felly y gweithio'r arblwyd a'r sianigau i'r p790r dŵr 2019. Mae gennym ni'n rai cyfoedwyr dros gyfnogol gyda 99795. Dyna'r cael ei ddweud i'r ddweud. Mae'n gweithio gyda'n gollio gyda'n gollio, ac mae'n gweithio gyda'n gwybodaeth. Wel, mae'r cyfnodd yw'r rhai bethau yma'r lleolau gyda'r cyfnodd yn y P790 2019. Mae'r cyfnodd yw'r cyfnodd gyfnodd gyfnodd gyfnodd. Rwy'n gweithio beth sy'n gweithio'r cyfnodd ar y pwysig new and old set of P790s, on one of them is the look, so throw some images up on screen now. The details are I think minor in terms of what they've done in terms of the looks, there's a lot more chrome in the new version, the logo on the back of the club is slightly different. It is what I would call like I said minor changes, but for me I do think it's an improvement, I am a sucker for a bit of shiny chrome, but I do think the P790 2019 does look a little bit better when it's sitting there in your bag but that means very little as we know and that's a very personal opinion as well. Maybe more importantly what they've changed is that address, less offset on the 2019 version I think that'll appeal to a lot of golfers out there and again whether or not you can pick that up it's minor but there is a difference there and the other thing is is the top line at address, slightly slimmer, narrower version on the new 2019 club and I think they've just simply achieved that by chamfering off that top line and I think that's one of the things they've done very well in terms of the overall aesthetics of the club as well is that they've thinned elements down, maybe the whole bulk and masses and that much difference that behind the ball but visually they've done these sort of clever little elements of chamfering off changing the colour and shade of the material which just gives that visual that it appears to be just that little bit smaller or thinner in that case and again overall profile of the club very very little difference at all other than those two things anyway that's it that's all that separates them in terms of looks what I'm interested in and want to start off is hitting the 9 iron and I'm going to tell you my immediate feedback after I switch between the two well so that's the last ball with the 9 iron and that's the new one I've finished up with collected data and plenty of balls with both of them at this stage nothing majorly different than I'm noticing and I'm trying not to get drawn into I don't want to start looking and analysing data just yet but on the base of what I'm seeing no major difference in the 9 iron so on to 7 iron right once again I'll finish up there plenty of balls hit with 7 iron on both clubs that's the last one with again the 2019 version um slightly I mean the one thing that I didn't mention on the 9 and I certainly felt it more so in the 7 iron I'm not seeing again any I've not looked at data but I'm not seeing anything fantastic in terms of what I'm seeing at least out there the scene should be performing again with a lot of similarities maybe just maybe a slightly higher ball fight on the 7 iron but I'll stand corrected if that's wrong but definitely the feel is a big difference slightly different acoustics inside here but there's a noticeable difference in sound and ultimately feel in what I'm hitting so far but in terms of performance not seeing anything major as yet so last one I'm going to step into the 5 iron see if there's any differences there well that's the last one of the 5 iron and that is right down the target line and to be fair one thing I will say is I've hit both clubs region be well and more than happy with the swings I've put on this morning I think it's been fair in terms of what each club had in terms of the swings from the average golfer this is the first iron where I've seen a difference and I hope this is backed up in terms of data because I said it out there on the course when we reviewed the P790s 2019 that for me one of the things they claim to have done tailor made is move the tungsten weighting quite a significant amount in terms of where it was in the longer irons because there was an issue and I can vouch for the issue in that I had the 654 iron of P790 of old in my bag and whilst it was a great powerful ball flight very very strong the launch angle was often quite low so stopping into greens would become an issue because of that low flat ball flight and one thing they tried to achieve in this new P790 particularly in the longer irons was like I said move around that tungsten weighting move that CG and help with launch and I think we are going to see I can't see how we're not going to see any difference in here by where the ball is definitely launching higher the question mark is how much impact that has is it a negative impact in terms of overall performance and we'll we'll see when we analyse the data but that's a first difference and without doubt through the three clubs the one thing I will say is the field is significantly different now for some people that's not a major deal but for me it's a massive tick in a box for the 2019 version is it one more before we go right I don't think there's much more to say I think we're going to have a look at data and I'll give you my overall opinion on how these two clubs differ is there a winner or loser and should you people with P790s currently in a bag be thinking about changing right okay so it's back inside and have a quick look through the numbers and give you what is going to be a fairly brief assessment to be honest with you like I said throughout the video and when I took them out on the course not massive difference certainly seeing that within the looks there's certainly tweaks I'm going to throw up first of all the spread of all the shots that I hit now again very much the performance of an average golfer some left some right and the odd one down the middle overall happy with the way I struck the ball that's pretty much as consistent as it gets for me like I said at my level we're going to start off by going straight into the data at the 99 and if you remember what I said with 99 at this stage not seeing anything noticeable on the eye at least but when you get down to the numbers there were certainly some improvements in there and if you take a look first of all once again clubhead speed very very similar however a slightly better ball speed which is always a positive suggests maybe just a little bit better performance across the clubface because there's no way to those strikes will be coming out the middle spin number far more impressive with the new version carry distance identical however launching again slightly lower but on peak height almost identical so the only thing I would say on there very briefly about the 99 like I said what I've seen on the course and in foregolf was that there was nothing visible far better spin number and again I think that's an improvement that we'd all like to see with that nine it's certainly better than what I was achieving with that older version at 60 which would be arguably certainly on that low side but from there let's slip into the 79 and see what the numbers look like for the 79 right okay so once again first thing I'm on note is clubhead speed consistent almost identical again for both slightly better ball speed once again seen on the 79 uh spin number almost identical carry distance almost identical launch angle slightly different 17.3 and I think if you analyse across the numbers obviously with an average it suggests it was slightly higher but you can certainly see that and with peak height again again going across the numbers there was that different slightly different ball flight um but once again I think we're not seeing anything majorly different in the lower end of the bag so for me it's spin numbers and improvement but still overall performance not greatly different but then for me this is the interesting bit I don't have six handed on a four iron but we did that five iron and this is where out on the course it was certainly a noticeable difference and one of the things with this changing and maneuvering of tungsten weighting suggests higher ball flight still maintaining spin and ultimately those distances that we're looking for but there was without doubt a difference in ball flight and launch angle and here come the numbers on the five iron okay so numbers in front of you now and once again I'll only be with this I was achieving a slightly better clubhead speed swinging it that little bit faster with the with the 790 2019 version so that would argue me where we'd see the better ball speeds and 128.7 as opposed to 126 but like I said offset that against the clubhead speed spin rate again uh was far better with and and when I say far better 300 revs um but a couple dropping out into 3000 it does not a great deal between them but what's interesting for me carry distance kind of extra seven yards uh however spinning um higher but again once again launch angle and just look at the final column in terms of p height on average and I think that's where ultimately like I said it's quite nice to always see the sort of data backup what you see out there on the golf course because I love on course testing but I think you always need the data to back up what you see and otherwise um it can be uh a a different way in which you're delivering the club but with with dribble data across us cross section of shots at least you start to seek some consistencies and can start to identify if that is the case and without doubts like I said seeing that out in the range uh it is a better ball fighting the longer iron in the five iron without doubt whether that translates into four and six you'd assume it does and I think that's the major difference uh in terms of the tungsten weighting and one of the issues perhaps like I said I mentioned in the previous video I had the longer irons in the p790 original version I'm also a very powerful and strong ball flight it was flat and I think that's our massive tweak they've made uh and a noticeable tweak they've made in these longer irons overall assessment is this the p790 uh new version is marginally better than the older version and the margins I wouldn't suggest they're going to take you from if you own p790s of all I don't think you're going to switch to the new version but without doubt with the when you throw the feel into the new version which is again a massive enhancement for me the feel and sound is massively different aesthetics is personal those without doubt what they've said they've achieved they they were looking to achieve they have done uh and that 719 new version is without doubt marginally better but whether it's enough to part with your dough is another matter but what I will say is if you're looking at new irons right now do not ignore the p790s 2019 because they're a top top set of irons and like I said in the previous video when I test them on my own certainly are on their own certainly one of the top three irons that I have tested of 2019 so far anyway I think that's it you've got enough data as maybe you go back and pause and analyse that data for those of you who like to do that kind of thing for the rest of your comments down below I hope you enjoyed the video hopefully it was useful in terms of what I fed back as ever as honest and as straightforward as I can make them thank you for watching thumbs up comments down below I'll see you soon