 Well, so thank you all again for speaking with us for this interesting breakout session. Ours was very lively. I believe the other session was like that too. And moving on to our plenary, which is starting with me, I'll give a small recap of our session 2A, which looked on the social aspects followed by Daniel. And then we'll have Kanya take over from there. So really quickly, we have three speakers, UT, Dianto, and Moira. And we have very interesting and very, I would say, broadening discussions and talks. UT talked about social cohesiveness, why it's important in the context of Wheatland restoration, particularly so because restoration activities face many challenges. And there is this space which is contested who owns the resources or like the ownership issue, the institutional issue and over time how those changes. So we discussed about those. The cohesiveness is an important parameter in that because these at a landscape level, these keeps on evolving. Then Dianto presented us with more questions than answers and basically highlighting again the complexity and we were discussing a little bit about the complex nature of relationship in terms of land and resources in yours and the conflict that arises and presenting a case study from West Kalimantan and the role of social forestry, how the area is targeted for social forestry, but it is a peatland and a peat dome and how those actions created more, I would say confusion because there's no clarity who owns the rights to that land and who decides what is undertaken there. And then lastly, Moira, she presented analysis, a case study from Vietnam where she looked into the network analysis of all different members within a small village community. And her presentation focused on the importance of participation for success of restoration program and what are the topics that come under like the equity, the social equity, how it's all equitable for everyone. And then exploring these networks, exploring these information exchange at a very local level can provide us with some insights and how to make these restoration, peatland restoration successful at a local level. And these are a few of the topics, the social aspect that are importantly included when we talk about criteria and indicators. So all three presenters provided a very, a quick snapshot that highlighted the complexity and very important topics related to peatland restoration. Thank you all. Thank you, Rupesh, and from our group, we were talking about the economic aspect of products coming out from peatland, Ibu City working with Lambung Mangorad University, but closely intact work with the local community in trying to improve the processing of product coming out from degraded peatland. So there are dozens of species that can be utilized and they all have a high market values. The challenge that they have really is how to improve the quality and also to access the market. But this product suddenly can come together with the restoration activities because they are non-timber products and certainly will be sustainable if the quality of the forest is also improved. So there are a lot of opportunity for South Kalimantan to link with activities in other places, especially to improve the price of these products. The university also play an important role in being the incubator of this product as well. So I should mention that. From Sumetohor village in Riau, we learn from Pamanan who is a local leader and also activist in the local NGO dealing with the improvement of product of Sagu. He has been working with community to produce Sagu with better and better quality, but a lot of assistance needed to improve, number one, the quality of the products so that they can improve the grade with a price of around 1700 rupiah to about 7000 rupiah per kilograms if it is processed well. That kind of technology, maybe not too difficult technology is needed so that the local community can have a better living and also a policy from the government to use the local product for any kind of social aids that are now being used during the COVID pandemic. It's a lot of budget to do that. The Bansos scheme is very important to purchase local product and use locally. Adarsono with his large scale conservation project in Pitland also made a very impact in the surrounding areas, the buffer area, even if it is mineral soil, working with farmers and growing a coconut to produce cobra as well as sugar. And the market is very high, very good, it was subsidized at the beginning and now they can be on their own or even perhaps busier to serve the market needs, the demand. So that's the stories from three different places from the economic perspective. Thank you very much. Thank you Pa Daniel. So next we have Kanya. She will be presenting with the, she has one evaluation and survey for an interactive exercise for all audience. So let me give blow to her so you can explain what her exercise is and let's all participate. Kanya, how about you? Thank you Rupesh. First of all, I would like to say thank you to our speakers for the insightful sessions and discussions and thanks to all our participants who already actively participated during the sessions on the chat box. Like Rupesh said, I will have a little exercise for all of us to be involved in. After you heard the presentations and involved in the discussions from this event, I would like to ask you some questions. So there will be questions appeared on your screen. It's a polling questions. We have three questions covered, government aspects, social and economic aspects. Each questions will have five choices. You need to choose three out of five choices. Okay. Without further ado. You have muted. You clicked the wrong button. I'm sorry. It's because I'm nervous about that. So, okay. I'll re-explain again. So we will have three questions. Each questions will have five choices. So please choose three as your best answer out of five choices. So without further ado, let us start the exercise. Hello, Madini. Can you help me to show the questions? Yeah. So this is the first question. Please choose three most important criteria for government aspects. These are five choices. So you need to choose only three. And then, yeah, please answer quickly. 30 seconds. And submit. And submit. Yeah. Don't forget to submit. Okay. Can you show me the results, please? Wow. So this is the answer. Most of us chose transparencies is the most important criteria and indicators. Follow up with the strong governance. And then. Access to resources. That's quite interesting questions. And then, okay. Move to the next question. You have to close this. So, like the previous one, please choose a three out of five questions, answers about the criteria for social aspects. Is it access to information, social networking, to new rights resolution of conflicts or local institutions. You can only pick one. You can only one. Why? Why Rini? You cannot choose to three. Well, let's choose the top most. Just the top. The best. Sorry about that. Yes. Please show the results. So most of us think that the most important criteria is about the tenor rights. Probably it's based on Paddianto presentation about the tenorial conflicts. And then the last move to the last questions, please. So it will be. It's like the previous one, please. Choose your best answer. And then submit it. Please show the answer. So most of us chose. Access to markets and then follow up by improved value of products. And then sustain production. Okay, please. Close. Thank you. I just want to add like a little sentence here. Those criteria, I think that's important for us to explore more. But let me synthesize what Pahar is saying in the previous session that whatever criteria that we chose, we need to think it will be localized criteria so that it can be implied and more understandable by our audience, especially for communities. So don't do complicated. Also said by Ravi from previous sessions of this webinar. Thank you very much. Back to you. Thank you. Thank you. Very nice exercise. We learn across this criteria today. And we are arriving in the last session that is equally important because this will help us to travel to the next session or the next series of webinar. So I would like to invite Paharis Kunawan, who is currently in the field is somewhere in South Kalimantan. You can see he's still sitting in his car with his face mask. Take care of yourself, Paharis. So please address the participant and give us your kind words and wise word how to move forward after this session. Paharis, you can also directly close this session after you have your message. Thank you very much. Thank you, Professor Daniel. Thank you, Rupis and Kanya. Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon. Good morning from everywhere where you are right now. I am pretty happy to have this event. I want to show something for Professor Daniel. What do you want to show from your computer? Yes, yes. Wow. Go ahead. So, yeah, I think the last our patient that Kanya already asked to make more easier how to make a priority the criteria and indicator for the, I think for the three aspects, the government, social and economic and all of you already excited items and then we right now follow up for the, like our assessment for the next, for the next meeting, we would like to discuss more detail about the, how we measure the criteria and indicator. It's also important to have like a deeper discussion about the discussion. And as I show this slide, as you know, that's nice. Okay. And I say nice speaker that the activities and we also listen from the all of the speaker that we also understanding that rural development methods and restoration must be from village know that. I think this is very important because the different ecosystem with others and ecosystem all over the world and the system already have many, many inhabitants or many communities. So how do we make the deal about sustainability life for the future. And then the other so we talk about the future that we can make a donation of the and so the many aspects would be considered as you already know the hydrology, biophysics and other socio-economic aspect. So, I think the high principle for the governance, but I saw that we already decide the important that about the government, about how to make a transparent and then also access the information and also the budget. So I think we need also to make a detail for the next meeting, how to measure and how to do this criteria and indicator. And the social aspect, I surprised that the participant said, in my understanding that, of course, the tenorial is very important, but I think we consider other aspects like social cohesion, social networking also very, very important to be established in the criteria and indicator. Land restoration agency has the IDPG indicator, but also I think should be including for the social criteria and indicator. So we need to be careful also if we work at the level, you cannot say very strict how to the community or how to the people use the land, because the concept of the restoration is also still new for the level community feel it. So I think we need to process to encourage and then to approach and work together with the community. I think that also very important for our discussion next discussion. And then I give the attention about the community or alternative sustainable life. I think we also listen to partners or not. As with the college, we cannot rely on the homo detainting. Of course, we need to make like the added value and also the product for the various products. I think the ecosystem, especially in the tropical, the understanding in the whole landscape. So we cannot say just one or two products, but also about the whole of the ecosystem to be a service for us. So I think we consider that how we also promote for the payment ecosystem services and then based on our research activity. So we are confident that we need to make the mix more detailed for the supporting community livelihood in the future. So we cannot rely on the one commodity. So I think all my include including remark and then so I think the next meeting we need to more discussion how to we measure how to establish the methodology to our decision criteria and indicator. And of course we are, I think so, very, very, thank you for all of you and all of the participants, especially from the team restoration gamut era. I mean that the local restoration, restoration team, we hope they can involve and then also can participate for the, our next meeting and then for the, our activity for the, like the, or the, to, to, to, to, to strong, to make a strong the criteria and indicator for the tropical pitland restoration. I think that's all. Thank you and stay healthy for all of you. Good afternoon. Assalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh. Thank you. Thank you very much Haris. Bye bye.