 hours. All right, Parks and Recreations committed community on many meetings. If you ask please, consider engaged and that's what makes our city work. So thank you for showing up tonight. I am Ron Endillard. I'm the co-chair for the Parks and Recreation on many and my fellow co-chair is who is getting love from the audience. And I do want to let everybody know we have a Spanish interpretation tonight. Claudia and Claudia I'll let you go ahead. Before we move on I do want to, so can everyone outside hear me as well? I can hear you. So if you want to recommend, I'm sure you all see me walk out about a few times during these meetings. That's usually what I'm doing. So we also have three representatives from each of our 10 city council districts on the Parks and Recreation committee and they are appointed by each of their respective city council members. So the first part of tonight's meeting will include a presentation from city staff Mike Crispy. He's the city engineer and director of transportation and capital and service department. It will include a follow-up of new projects presented by residents attending the past two meetings. Mike will go over the scope and estimate the cost for these new projects. Additionally, last week city staff sent all committee members a survey to get the committees input on projects to tour. Mike Crispy will provide recommendation with the results from this survey. So you probably got that email this week asking about which part you want to tour through. So we'll begin the results of that. After Mike's presentation, we'll have 20 minutes allocated for committee members discussion. So tonight is the last of our citizens to be heard so we want to make sure that we give the public enough time to get the voices out and heard by us. The rest of the meeting will be dedicated to citizens to be heard. As this is the last meeting, the residents will have an opportunity to provide input. The last two meetings will be dedicated to committee discussion of the proposed projects. This is the time we get to get together and work as a team. If you brought materials with you, citizens to be heard, if you brought materials with you, staff will be passing those out to the committee members on your behalf. If you did not submit your materials, when you sign up to speak, we ask that you please provide those items to staff at this time. If you have staff in the room, you raise your hands. Persons organizations must sign in in person by 6.30 p.m. in order to be recognized to speak. And it is currently 6.15. Persons registered to speak must be present in order to give their time to another registered speaker. So persons organizations must sign in in person by 6.30 p.m. We repeat that. We will be calling the names of three speakers at the time that I want speakers to be ready to present. That each speaker, please state their name and the subject that they will be addressing. So if you are coming up here to speak on a certain park, state your name, park, please. It helps the community. The co-chairs, committee members, and lots of committee members, it is great to have you all. This is exactly what we've been hoping for. It was great attendance of these committee meetings. We've had over 800 people show up for meetings amongst the five different committees. So yeah, round of applause here. And we know people are passionate about parks and recreation. So what we want to do is get a very short staff presentation, turn it back to you all as a committee, and then have plenty of time. And we know a lot of people have signed up to speak tonight. So we'll want to get to those quickly. Okay, so we have just three things we want to touch on. In front of you is a list in green here. These are the projects that are the new projects. It says unfunded projects. So these are the ones that were not part of the staff recommendations, but they are definitely for you to consider. People have signed up to speak, to speak about these projects. I'm just going to speak to them by name. And then I'm going to go into the scope. You have the scope information there, and you have a requested dollar amount there as well. Some of them don't have a dollar amount. There's a person that spoke about the project. They didn't have a specific dollar amount associated with that. But we have a full Spanish Trail Soccer Complex, Dawson Park, John James Park. This is an access to full high school. 1-2-3 King Plaza, Pippin Sullivan Park, YMCA, Flettingport, Whiteing Phase 2, YMCA, Master Plan, that's the swimming pool. The Stinson Park, 590 Markin' Not Baby, Rainbow Hills, Dunesian, Baseball Park, 5-1s, Bigweight Terrace Subdivision, Normal Park, Senior Softball League, District 6th, Aden State Park, Hypert-Ettos, Homers Association New Park, and then Manichello Park as well. So, those are all for your consideration through this process. The next one, let's go to the next one. Quick question. Mike, would you clarify the total amount requested that those line items, that is what was requested in the presentation of the event so far? Right. That was where the owner of that project brought that project forward, provided a number. I think we're going to open it up for the committee after a bit. So, let me just knock out two more items for you and then turn it back to you. So, I think you all are going to set a record for two or responses to the survey. You've done a great job. We had 27 responses out of the 32 committees. So, if you're on your map, that's 81 percent. We'll let you know if anybody can detail that. That's a great turnout for that. And we want to share the results here. So, the first question was to select one of the dates which you would like to take it toward. So, at 56 percent, we had the Saturday, December 3rd. That's really good timing for it. And so, that's what it looks like as we look at the other committees, too. That'll be a tour of Saturday. We'll also make a tour of that date. So, that's what we've been looking to do. So, mark that out on your calendar, Saturday, December 3rd. You'll get a lot more information about that date, the time, and so forth. We also asked you what projects do you want to go see in the tour? So, we have a wide range here. But we have definitely some that got a lot more votes than others. All the way through, we've got this chart, but we've got one more that shows a little better. So, this has all of them on there. At the top, on a tour like that, typically you can get to six or seven different parks throughout the city. You can't cover 59 or so parks that we've rented here. But, by far, the most votes, 13 responses for Hemisphere Civic Park, 12 for Hartford Park, 9 for McAllister Park, 6 for Brackridge Park, and then 5 apiece for Lockwood-Hitley-Wittney Parks and Oak Beach-Nagel Park as well. So, those are some of those big projects throughout the city. Now, one that was also mentioned, the old Spanish trail that was not in the staff recognition, but it's another project that was shown on that green list that's one to go look at. So, what we plan to do is work with the co-chairs to kind of look at that and finalize a plan and a rally for that for the day so that we can get throughout the city and see these great parks. Okay, the other one that we've had, the great thing about the interaction between meetings is we fill in emails and we work with the committee and we've had a lot of questions about the project that's kind of flown into the radar so far. And this is, you like to do sports fields, what's this all about down in Brook City-based. So, I thought, you know, giving the attention that we've had from you all, all the districts, in fact, well let me just share a couple of slides on that because we do know quite a bit of information about this project. So, if you're familiar with Brook City-based down off of New York State 37, the southeast military, just to the south of the southeast military, lots of development going on and redevelopment happening here. The sports fields that are planned by the UIW in coordination with Brook City-based are down in this southwestern part of the area. So, then we've got a close-up of this. Let's go to the next slide. So, basically what we have proposed is probably the staff recommendations, 2.8 million. The initial request from UIW in Brook City-based was, our approach to development was 10 million. So, they were looking for 10 million. We were able to work everything out. We proposed 2.8 million. So, this would be a leveraged project with University of Concord and their plan down here is soccer tennis courts. See, this is a dozen tennis courts here, big soccer field and track. So, concessions, restrooms, facilities, other sports fields here. We have a phase one plan and basically this does, we've talked before about public access. So, we've talked with UIW about that. What's the plan? Is this just for University of Concord or what is it? And it's similar to the ETSA arrangement. They're very much open to, obviously the city has to have some long-term ownership, some kind of 20-year ownership of some kind. It has to be open to the public. These are going to be some, like ETSA, there will be high-quality facilities and quality fields, but they are definitely wanting, and if they put public on there, they want public use of these facilities. So, they are playing with leagues and so forth. They'll have a scheduling system where organizations can schedule time and be there and also for city functions as well. So, it may not be where you can just walk up there on any given day and start playing frisbee out on the field because of the high level of play that's going on there and the quality that they're looking for, but it would be accessible by leagues and by the public to come out in the reserve time and use that space. So, very similar to ETSA. So, I do want to make a note that we're going to have this community discussion right after this. So, yeah, I'll let someone tell. I'm going to put you next on the list. Okay, I think that wraps it up. Just a brief event on where we're at and we're going to turn it back to you all. Okay, so with that, thank you very much. I really appreciate the presentation. We're going to jump into community discussion now formally. We've got 20 minutes to audit for this. And I'd like to, first, before we jump into a round of it, I'd like to make sure that all of the districts get represented and their ability to ask questions. So, we're going to do, as we've done before, we're going to go around my district and make sure that each district has a question that is, if they are able to close your question and answer your bigger question to answer, and then we'll open it up to the floor and then we'll have Brian take the list and do a round start. So, let's start. We started here last time. We started with district six. District six, sorry, do you have a question that you would like to pose for Mike? Yeah, Mike, my question is on the sheet where we have to get a project from a lot of time. And we're district six. So, we have big parts in here, and none of them have ever been out for years. Is there a representation here today that have, that are heading out to this part, do you have years with us, or do you have years with us after? So, we have, we've taken this data that are nested based on what we heard and what we know about the project. Right. So, the district six gave a state part when we compare that to other state parts and some of the property acquisition and then the construction and so forth, that's potentially a $4 million project. And then the other one you mentioned was the type of metals, right? Right. That one were estimated roughly at $1.5 million. The new part. District seven, the question. Is this number, in case we want to be, is this regarding case one and case two or is it just for case one? This is phase one. Is there any other presentations that we're going to see for other countries versus the last three? Is this final? Is this for consideration? No, it will be as we go through our discussion if we want to see additional presentations we can request additional presentations. Mike, I was wondering, is there any one place where we can go and look up what leverage you in on it? Is that all on the terms? Yeah, we have provided that. We can also, it's not on the website, we'll get it up there. It's in the follow-up information there. Okay. Excuse me. It's okay. We've had a lot of information, so make sure everybody gets to get a piece of it. District nine. And where? We have several large projects, the primary range of arms, the chemistry, and the lieutenant-in-charge is in the Department of Humanities. Do you have an idea as to what's going on in those four or five projects? We have, so we're not into design on some of those yet. Right. But we do have the basic score information that we've provided to you in the initial presentation. We'll have to see if we've gotten any more specifically through three or four main components of the Civic Park project that we've talked about. But if there's any specific one you want us to get further in detail, we'll see what we can have on it. So in particular, we want to do that. But we've tried to provide you as much as we know today. For me, the primary range part and the lieutenant-in-charge is the Zoo Park that is our turn. We'll have to see if we can get to our parts of our direction right there. So the technical garden, that item is for the construction of an educational and multi-use facility, something similar to the Urban Ecology Gathering Hall. So it's for a complete middle-level structure, a closed, controlled environment on the other one you asked on specifically was Rackridge Park is a number of items. So the focus being on the restoration of some of the historic features, meaning some of the historic buildings that are on the property that were part of the original San Antonio waterworks. Also the historic retaining walls in the river. Those are WPA project walls that were constructed in our community because of the trees, roots pushing those walls and shifting the value of some of the walls. So the majority of the funding and all of the funding actually is focus. Our focus would be on restoration of those historic features. Also, we're going to clean up the river all the way down there. That is a project that San Antonio River Authority is looking at because that is actually in the channel and that falls under the U.S. Department of Engineers and then it is in the park. Take your seat here. Okay, District 10, please. Your question? Yes, on the unfunded part of projects, how does one get their project on here? Like these groups, I understand city staff was present on the wall but the reason why I asked that is there was a proposed project that didn't make a list. It hasn't been talked about. It's in regards to the linear creekway and some vital creek improvements that's similar to drainage projects in terms of location. Okay, any project that we hear through this process, we're going to continue to add to this list of even ones that are introduced tonight for those that signed up this week and committee members, if there's something else we want to look at, we'll continue to add to this slide. Okay, one more thank you. I just wanted to see how we can... The process has been on the list? Basically, this has been from the start of the process, we've heard that's new. That's not always that. Great. To get unfunded, can you cut something else? Yes, this is currently unfunded and now we're part of the committee discussion pretty heavily. You know, amongst the committees we've talked about citizen sign them to speak for the first three meetings and then dedicating the fourth and fifth meeting to really the committee's work but obviously we know that it's going to take a while to get there. Anything else? This is in the description of the District and McAuster Park project. Just wanted to make sure that these had actually separated for McAuster Park funding as well, not just the capital being a full team relocation. So I just wanted to make sure that we just classified that on the list. So the committee action for that meeting was to separate the two, right? And we'll worry about the funding later, but we're going to separate the two so that they don't go to the same place. The capital will be in McAuster Park. So now they're two projects and sort of sort out the dollars from there. But it's just not McAuster Park because it was not here. Just the capital which we have that in. So the intent of the staff recommendations was to fund capital moving at McAuster Park. So that's what we show capital moving. We still have that out there. Really are a lot of our discussions and we would like to make both of them more. We would like to end up with two million for capital moving and two million for McAuster Park. Another big win-win but we have to work with the committee on how to do that. I understand where you're coming from and we should address that. I know McAuster is not on the list and I just saw that myself as well. So we'll address this now. Absolutely. Thank you. Thank you for that. Thank you for that. Okay. Let's move across the room and go to district one. Your question. Thank you. I just have a general clarification question. I know this on several of these. We have general improvements again. Some of them we have to possibly improve enough. Is it two of those by its town? Where did those come from? So it's a couple of places where a lot of these parks have already been working in the community quite heavily in previous bonds and on an annual basis. So we know kind of what the next step is. So we put some ideas in there. But as we've talked before, once the voters approve the projects we're going to engage with the community again to say here's what we're thinking. What are you thinking to make sure we're on the same page of the community. So we don't say for sure this is going to happen because we want to make sure there's flexibility within the community. Yes, on every part of the project there's both the community and the foreign community. It's quite a lot. We now have your question. Mr. Thank you. I have a question that I have been settled with Mr. Gordon came in and he talked about some issues with that part. But I noticed there's no numbers here. You're able to provide us some numbers of these parks that don't have that information so that we can kind of have a guide that's committed so that we can move forward. And also, a visual reality of all these parks especially the ones that did not make this survey because I was out of the way of this survey. And so I would like to see some of these other parks and what they have to offer, what they're asking, how we can put that presentation together. Is that possible? So if you go to the city's home page of Santona, that value there's a link to the 2017 model and we have their activity map on that site of all the projects that are recommended. And then you can drill down very specifically to the views of that and some scope information about the projects as well. So that is available. I mean this was serious additional. That's what I'm speaking of. The additional is missing numbers and also virtual reality of these parks because as you already have, you just get to the parks. I would like to see some of these additional citizens came and asked about it. Okay, we'll look to see how to do that. There's a variety of information. Someone can hand it out and what we can do is see what we can do by identifying those things and looking at that. So we'll have to follow up and see what we can do. On the numbers though, the ones that did not bring a number with them, we kind of took a stab at what we think based on the scope. So we have the Sullivan Park with David Scott, YMCA area. 500 feet with a thousand was our kind of ballpark estimate in scope. So you have the numbers for all of them? We have an internal number that we said based on what we know here is kind of the range of what we think we're doing. Thank you, sir. So we have on to district 3. Yes, I have a quick question. On this e-mail I received from Parks and Recreation a project and staff recommended project increase requests. There are these projects that are on here but I don't have those on them but some of these were not on the staff recommended list and now they're on the I guess it's a new list for substantial amount of money. So how is this going to incorporate to choose the ones that are not on the list of not on the original list? So it's in who decides I want them, you know this is staff recommended so I just wanted to know if the committee is not involved in these decisions or Sure. So yeah, process wise we started the community process where the staff recommended slate of projects, the 59 funders that we had and then what we've done is we've been building this green list on the new projects that have been heard so these are not necessarily the recommended they're just information to the committee and dollar amounts associated with that is the scope of the nation so really now it's the committee's responsibility with us to kind of work through how many of these projects get into the recommendation committee has that moves forward the council and as the city manager and the spellings said obviously you have to stay within the money so if you're going to add something you have to post cutting something so that's going to be a big part of the next meeting I understand that because the list that you gave us there doesn't have enough of the other list that's a new project increase or added does have enough so I was just wondering Okay. I have a question about the rainbow hills there's no a map list that I can see not but I have to know that when they built a community center that they put in a foundation already so they're gymnasium because we added and they fixed that act well so he moved out so that they couldn't get gymnasium inside and so I'd like to I'd like to know why there's no funding that gets that for this particular project Yeah, we did we did put a number to it based on what we know and so that was 3.25 million which is amazing I don't know if that can become an existing foundation so Ron and Jude with our team says that that took into account for an existing foundation there so the numbers we show are what was provided and then some of them were left blank because there wasn't a number provided but 3.25 is ours to do that Thank you Thank you for that clarification so it's not necessarily that we don't know the number it's just that it was not presented during the presentation it was given when the project was proposed during the test Thank you All right and for district 5 please Question Yes I have a question on the staff telling us about the parking garage I'm just wondering is it should it be in facilities because it's a structural thing other than a park issue because it seems like it would be more a facility issue Yes and it's in both this is one of the few projects that shows up in both categories so we have some funding in the facilities because it is a parking garage facility but we also have funding in the parks because it's going to serve the parking area so in the discussions we thought you know it's really both so we put it in both it's a total of 12 million dollars that are split into two different categories So are we talking about a million? Thank you Any questions? All right Okay we have about five minutes left so we can open up to some questions in the PBIC right now first Go ahead Thanks just to round it out can we have the rest of the ones that were left off that you have a guest in on? Sure let me provide those I'll just start with Pippin's all the games Stinson Park $500,000 $400,000 The Rainbow Builds to Maison $3.25 million This is the District 6 Skate Park $4 million Iver Nose H.O.A. New Park $1.5 million and then the Monticello $350,000 and that again is based on the scope as we know it this week Yeah I think part of the confusion and I think you clear one of the things In the handouts that were sent to us in the email this list had a title of it said Parks and Recreation New Project and Staff Recommended Project Increase Request Tonight you have the right title on it but one of the things that you did have on here is the allows me to teach this list that was a column that was on that was very close and it's not on the list I just have a quick question What Chuck asked earlier on was which projects have leverage funds and there is a list of the projects where there's no dollars so it would be helpful if we knew how much everybody was raising to help support this project Okay we'll get that sent out I'm sure it's well advanced Okay Richard do you have a question Okay Okay for Tom Mike Mike on the UIW for example on some of these leverage projects Do we have like a breakdown on how much time use of those fields will be devoted to city use versus less UIW use is that based on how much UIW and the city contribute to the project for example if the city contributes 20% UIW 80% does the city get 20% use of those fields and does that have an agreement with UIW for example What we're going to be doing Tom is we're going to negotiate and really we're looking at this calendar year anything that's moving on from the committee we're going to have an agreement with the other party on those types of things to really lay that out We're not going to be specifically just a breakdown in college but we want to make sure we get the most that we can That would be part of the negotiation Mike It's a lobby It's a lobby but it's the historic clauses there that need to be historic Are we going to have a new business or are we going to have a new business or are we going to have a new business or are we going to see a new consideration in the businesses What we have at this point right now we know there's a lot of needs and a great plaza over there so that would be a fun place Okay Grace rose your question on the the soft field OSD because of the fact that it's like right between 1 and 7 is that one of those things that we have to put in share because you know some of them we have that the project is shared we're going to districts and because it's right there all the way to the road it's really heavy 7 always considers the other side of right around 7 it's really it's really difficult but we're looking at a project that we feel like it's at 7 but it's actually a new one so that's one of those kind of projects that can actually be shared which project? the OSD the soft field OSD oh okay you know we can look at that to see where it's cited most of those we look at where it's cited yeah so in a lot of cases there's going to be a couple of districts that are going to benefit from it but we look more at something like that as to where it's cited but at this point really it's not going to make that much difference because it's you're talking about as a community of $116 million to work with you've got staff recommendations you've got a great list of additional possibilities here so it's really what is the committee want to be a hit to that 116 district 7 I know there are a couple more questions out there but I'm going to have to cut off now we've got quite a few people signed up to speak this evening and this is our last evening to hear about what testimony and we want to give them the whole opportunity to speak