 Good afternoon, everyone. My name is Srahmat and I am with my college year, Iksan Mokhtar from Wikimedia Indonesia would like to present to you on exploring the relationship between attitudes, norms and contributory behaviors of Indonesian Wikipedia editors. So why we did this survey? Because as you know that Indonesia has a large number of islands, we have also different local languages and ethnicities and also religions here in Indonesia. And we would like to investigate whether the editors, the norms and the contributory behaviors to around 100 Indonesian editors on Indonesian Wikipedia. And also we would like to understand that these factors can enhance Wikipedia's impact and outreach, which is done by the chapters in Indonesia. And lastly, this study also to see the insights that could benefits both the chapters Wikimedia Indonesia and also the communities in general. So this study has already concluded in the last year. The first of this presentation has been done in ECF conference back in Sydney last year. And we have also shared this survey to different participants of Indonesian Wikipedia editors. And we have around 100 of Wikipedia editors in Indonesian Wikipedia in filling out this survey. And we also requested them to have a username and edited at least five times in the year of the survey and also not being blocked in any Wikimedia projects. And if you are curious about how many of the questions that we have asked, it's around 30 questions. So this is the study who would like to understand the profile of Indonesian Wikipedia and also understanding the editors, norm and contributory behaviors. And this is what we have collected so far. If you see in the screen that there are around 87% of male that filling out this survey and also female 9% and they didn't specify the gender for around 4%. And also the education of the participants is higher education, which is around 53%. And also senior high school and lower high school is around 47%. And in the terms of age, we have people from 17 and between 17 and 25 years old. We have also people from 36 to 45 years old filling out the survey. And also we collected some of their background and they are working full-time for around 40% and also working part-time for around 23%. And the rest is not working for around 37%. And also we asked them if they are still in the college or in the high school or in the master education level. So the people still studying is around 30% and also not studying 70%, which is either they are working or not. So for around 100 participants who fill out the survey, we have people who are bilingual is around 40% and multilingual is around 30%. And also the total of languages that have been identified or presented by the participants is 25. And also Indonesian is the most option, is the most language, the domain language that mastered by all the respondents. And also another other languages that mastered by the participants is Japanese, Malay, English, and also Minangkabel and Sundanese, which is the local languages in Indonesia. And we would like to see here the approximate how many hours in a day that they spend on Wikipedia and also how many years they have been contributing to Wikimedia projects. And also we would like to see whether they spend their personal funds here from their own pocket to contribute to Wikipedia or Wikimedia projects. And also we would like to see whether they are interacting with other Wikimedia or Wikipedia communities in Indonesia. And if you see here, more than five hours people, sorry, around 10 people spend more than five hours on Wikipedia. And also if you see here around 23 people who are responding to the survey spend less than an hour in Wikipedia. And this is something that we are excited to see that there are people who spend more than five hours in a day in Wikipedia. This is something that's so interesting. And also if we want to see whether there are already long-term editor in Wikipedia, we already obtained the data here. More than 50, more than 41 people who has been contributing to Wikipedia. And this is, you know, like something we want to see here. And this is how many people who are using their personal funds. And this is how many people who are interacting with communities. And the next one will be presented by Paek Sen. Paek Sen. Okay. I will continue with the attitudes. Okay. So in attitudes, we're looking to the initial motivation when they start contributing to Wikipedia and the continuing motivation. And also we would like to see their attitude if they found a problem and also what they feel when they're editing, do they receive, they feel they receive support from the communities or from the chapter. Okay. So here we can see that 45% of them think that they're very motivated when they're joining Wikipedia. So they have four or more reasons why they start editing. And also 27% have three motivations and 28% have one or two motivations. So at the beginning, it's already three or more reasons why they start editing. Okay. And if they already contribute to Wikipedia and they stay, so is that really increasing or not the motivation? So we can see here that it actually increased like 72% have four or more motivation. And 9% have three motivations and only 19% have one or two motivations. Okay. Next. So here we see that it is their reaction if they find a problem. So already majority 64%, they can correct the problem and also they can improve the problem if they find it. And there's always these 5% people who get angry and maybe just ignore. And here I see opportunities like 29% quite significant think that they don't think there's a problem with Wikipedia article. And 2% are too hesitant to edit. Okay. And here we see how many of them that think they have received support in any kind. So only 31% think that they have some kind of support from the communities or from the chapter and 69% are actually just editing online and or even if they interact, they don't think they receive support. And out of the 31, only 14 people think that they already have enough support. So there's a room of improvement here because the other nine is not satisfied and three neutral and 5% doesn't answer more. Okay. So after we talk about the attitudes, this is the norms that we check with the contributor. So the first one is that everyone should be involved in contributing to Wikipedia and starting small. And the second one, every Wikipedia should set good example to attract new users. And third one, every Wikipedia should create good atmosphere to increase the interest of existing users to continue their participation. And the fourth one, every Wikipedia should promote the positive contribution made to attract public interest. Okay. So we can see that 54% or strongly agree that everyone should be involved in contributing to Wikipedia. 26% agree and 17% neutral. Okay. So here we see that being good example is even stronger. Believed by the respondent like 94% agree or strongly agree that the Wikipedia should set good example to attract new users. And here we can see 96% agree or strongly agree that we should create good atmosphere to invite people to continue and promote contribution. 68% agree or strongly agree that they should promote their good deeds. But here quite significantly we can percent think that it's neutral. So we can do a good thing, but maybe other people can promote it, not me. Okay. So general conclusion that we got. It kind of aligns with tier of reason action revealing that contributors attitude and norms can influence their behavior and positive attitudes toward editing reinforced by perceived social norm contribute to the contributors sustained commitment. However, the study also underscore the need to address some of the contributors perceived lack of support. Okay. So maybe in the future we can do initiative that targeting attitude enhancement or community reading and clarifying positive norms. And ideas since a lot of people who spend their own money to edit are people already working. So maybe we could reintroduce the voucher grant program to encourage the younger contributors to contribute. And also we can have educational outreach efforts to clarify misconception and also probably scholarship for already active contributors but less sociable so they can attend an exchange intercommunity event. So they can increase their horizon and be in the community longer. I think that's it for now. We're open if you have question. Thank you very much. I just want to ask are you you polled for whether people are bilingual or multilingual? Do they if the ones who are bilingual multilingual do they tend to edit on multiple languages or do they mostly stick to one particular project? Okay. Thank you. The people who have multiple languages is actually we derive the data from their involvement in other Wikipedia activities. So there's like 37% of the respondents also editing in Japanese and like that. Any other question? Okay. So I think that's our conclusion on the survey. So happy to see you in other session if you want to ask more about this. Thank you.