 I'm Urs Goster, I'm the Executive Director of the Birken Center. I had the pleasure to be one of the co-hosts of today's conference. It's been a very rich day. We've covered a lot of grounds. We had, you know, speakers from various disciplines introducing their views and perspectives on the topic privacy and the public and how, you know, digital technologies actually blurred the lines between these two posts. I think the key challenge that I'm left with coming out of this wonderful conference is that we really need to think hard about social design, about the design of institutions, the design of spaces, processes that allow us actually to have conversations around different expectations of privacy, also kind of different notions on the value of the public. That's kind of, I think, what it boils down to because obviously we live in a world where we also disagree on norms, privacy norms, where we use technology for different purposes. Sometimes we use it in contexts where we have strong preferences to remain private and in other setups. We are very interested in creating a public sphere and to me the challenge really is to improve and advance our repertoire, our institutional repertoire, to kind of negotiate these differences and, in a way, create a more interoperable ecosystem. I would be very surprised if there is a clear answer to this question in the future. I think we have to see it as a spectrum. I believe that currently the way the technology that so many of us are using, Facebook, Twitter, you name it, and the kind of large-scale data aggregation and collection that happens behind the surface, that this obviously, together with user behavior, leads to kind of a more public notion to a more public environment. But again, the pendulum may well swing back. We also see here in the US, but also in Europe, and in Asia, of course, conversations about the reinvention of privacy, the reintroduction of privacy in cyberspace, take the European example of a right to be forgotten. It has certainly shaped my thinking about these issues. The most important aspect, I think, is really the strong interest from the perspective of design and architecture that seems to be more interested and concerned about the public, as opposed to my own biases and my own background as a legal scholar. I have focused more in the past on the privacy challenge and not thought so much about kind of the tools available in the toolbox of law and policy makers to structure the public space in a sustainable way or in a way that creates a robust information ecosystem. So that's kind of the key challenge, I think, that I face today for me personally and that has really influenced my thinking.