 So, Paul, you've talked to me before about the magic of this campus and the fact that it was sort of built in a way different from other campuses at the time, the lack of the quadrangle as a defining feature. Tell me a little bit about how that came about and what creates the magic of the Mount Holyoke campus? Well, it's an interesting question because it kind of came about not by some grand master plan, but driven by expediency. The seminary had a fire in 1896 that forced the college's hand. The correspondence shows that Mount Holyoke wanted to evolve and be more of a model like the other competing institutions at the time and have more of a formality to it, more of a rigid rectilinear quadrangle if you would. But the fire forced their hand and in a very short timeframe, even by today's modern standards, they built these three residence halls, Brigham, Safford, Porter, very rapidly. I think just a series of good decisions, practical, expedient, prudent, made for some special magic. This proportion that landscape architects talk about a balance between building massive building size, dimension, height with its relation to the trees and the sky. So as we look at Safford, we see some of the most wonderful detail. They clearly made decisions about whether they were going to spend some money and it wasn't all utilitarian. Much of it is decorative. Safford's a great example of what was going on at the time when they built Safford. You can see that it's a classic red brick with brown stone lintels above the windows, slate, copper gutters, copper flashing, a copper dome up there, the architectural woodwork above the entrance there, as you've mentioned. It's beautiful and it was important to them and I think it helps contribute to the magic of it. They knew at the time that they would be here a long time. They were building for the long term future and it has endured and we still enjoy it today.