 the transparency factor is not there, right? So, you know, double blind peer review, blind peer review. You know, I understand some of the advantages of that, but there's a whole bunch of laborer and decision-making that goes into getting an article published and then decision-making around that labor and evaluating the reviews that's completely opaque to anyone except the decision-makers. And we're social scientists for Christ's sake. We know that that's a setup for bias. Like, we know all the research about what works and what doesn't to reduce individual bias and it's accountability and it's doing things in front of peers and yet we throw it out the window for our own work.