 Ethical issues talk about many important topics and the competence of the test user is another important area which is included into it. The competence of test user is as important as the test itself. A competent test user will use tests appropriately, professionally and in a very ethical manner. So this is very important that tests should be done in regard to all these three aspects very vigilantly and it should be done into a very ethical manner. The test user will pay due regard to the needs and right of those involved in the testing process. You know, there are many people who are involved in testing process and one should give the due regard to all of them who are involved in that very process. The reasons for testing and the broader context in which test is being taken place. At times, we need to see that what specific protocols should be taken care of. Sometimes we make a test to generate a very sensitive report which may require the forensic department. So there are many ethical obligations that all protocols should be duly followed while they should be duly followed so that the minimum chance of error remains so that our report is valid or accurate. So the contest, the perspective, all these things are very very important. Competencies of the proper use of tests is very very essential and it is very highly recommended in ethical psychology to be focused on. Taking errors in scoring and recording, it should not be a casual task, we can't do that because this is something which is going to be used for a very special purpose. So it should be very vigilant and it's scoring is very important to be very careful. Keeping scoring keys and test material secure. It is very important to keep the keys and test material secure because there should not be any kind of change in it, there should not be any misplaces in it. Some items are written on page number 3 and they are misplaced from you and they are skipped and they are zero in total scoring. And your result is invalid because of that one missing template. So these are the very minor things which need to be taken care properly. Refraining from labelling people with personally derogatory terms like in the result of this test this person seems to be very dishonest and this person seems to be with one specific disorder or another. So you know basically we just can't say that on the basis of a test some person can be labelled as with one value or one category. Seeing that every examiner's follow direction so the test scores are accurate. If properly we follow the instructions then we get reliable and valid scores. Using setting for the test allow for optimum performance by the taker like if our room is adequate, if it is not very cold there, if it is not very hot, if the seating posters are comfortable then people can easily produce their test there. Willingness to give interpretation and guidance to the test taker in counselling situations. If someone is very panicked then they can provide some counselling there, tell them the purpose of the test, do some work and after that they can be tested again. Refraining from using home made answer sheets that do not align properly with scoring keys. There are a lot of such tests for which already developed scoring keys are used, there are specific standard templates. If we don't use them then we use home made templates in the lew. For example there are a lot of personality tests, we use specific scoring cards while scoring so there the misinterpretation of scoring can be dangerous. Establishing RAPO with examining to obtain accurate score. Of course RAPO is very important in all such psychological matters so that we can see better performance. Refraining from answering question from test takers in greater deal than the test manual permits. Like manual is not allowing you to give a lot of answers, give a lot of answers so that the question becomes examiner instead of a test taker. So there it is necessary to see how much guidance we need to provide, how much manual is permitting. Refraining from coaching or training individuals or group on test items. You cannot explain to them what the particular purpose of this test item will be for assessment. It should be generally given instructions and after that individual will solve it. With results to misinterpretation of person's ability and competence. Like if we tell someone that this specific item is looking at your charitable behaviour rather than your lifestyle then maybe they are going to give it a different score if you do not give them this instruction. So as much manual is permitting you are not supposed to go beyond that. Not assuming that a norm for one job applies to a different job and not assuming that norms for one group automatically applies to other groups. When it comes to a test, this is very important to understand that the norms and references of that are different according to the population. For instance, if we talk about the Rosenberg scale of self-esteem then the overall average value of that is less for the Pakistani population in India and other countries in South Asia as compared to the developed investment countries. So the reference norms can be different across the population group. So this is something which is very important with reference to the competence of test user.