 It's great that Impact has been running a property for now 7 years and it brings 50 disparate women together, which is I think the great thing. You know, it's over the years now that I've been attending. I've made friends with most of them and I look forward to the event more than just the award or the ranking is to meet these women because often I meet them just once a year and this is the place that I meet them. It's not the correct way of viewing a leader. A leader is a leader. It is gender agnostic according to me. You know, an individual has styles and different individuals have different styles. And while I know globally many men leaders and women leaders, the difference they portray is the take charge versus take care, which is a standard way of looking at it. But I think that's not the right way. Either an individual is a good leader or he's not or she's not.