 We were very excited when we got the results of Mr. Ron Johnson coming back, what we had said, as well as Donald Trump being elected president, the guy who was sworn any more than any president in his memory, the role of business, pro-manufacturing states. And I'm not over the things we've done so far, the things we hope to do, taking the reasons why some of us believe in myself rather than at this point. Every day we get more moves, I guess, just yesterday and the day before we had another person who was able to enable the National Legal Relations Board, kind of as the joint set, the joint civil rule there regarding franchises and that sort of thing. So now we have four of the five people on the National Legal Relations Board. As soon as we have the fifth person confirmed, which will be in the near future, we're going to be able to work away and chill away at that. There is some of a perception we're not doing. And actually, as far as just buying this stuff, it's been a long night since the Congress was so productive. The House itself, when Trump's first other day has 158 bills, we have 35 bills signed to the law, and at least that's more activity that you've seen in Congress in the first year of a President, at least before HW Bush. So as far as pure volume, we've been doing a lot. I'll deal with the things we haven't gotten done yet, but we'll be passed out of bill on career and technical education, which is something we've been waiting for a long time. I know in this state, we have such a labor shortage, particularly from the manufacturing jobs around here. So we're giving hopefully, as a government, more flexibility to how they can use federal money to make sure that we are able to apply the money in places in which people can't get jobs and which industry needs them. And then when you look at your business, I mean to look at three things. So it's your regulatory environment, your labor, your situation, your taxation. And I'm hoping to get that bill through the Senate as well. We had passed it last year. The Senate did not take that design, but that would be a good step in the right direction as far as dealing with labor shortage. We've dealt with several bills on sex trafficking. Now that's a big thing around here. The nation has a bigger problem than it used to be. Both of those bills are passed on a bipartisan basis. But again, this perception of that, so many people say, why aren't Republicans and Democrats? Why aren't folks and Democrats operating together? We pass a lot of bills all the time. I think we have a lot of bills. Personally, I think there's certain bills that we're going to have problems with. But I think we got the Democrats on board there. We had Donald Trump sign a nice bill with regard to VA reform. Among other things, we're going to be able to remove bad employees from the VA. That was something that was always, you know, always frustrating in government to have bad employees who can't get rid of them. When I was in the state legislature for years, I tried to make an issue to remove a bad teacher, which was hurting our schools and everybody of those bills. We were finally Scott Walker came along, cared enough about education. And we got that done. And finally with Donald Trump, he wrote a bill that had improved under Barack Obama, but under Donald Trump, we finally are getting a little more VA reform, which I think is a good thing. We are working on our budget right now. Well, let me deal with the things that we've done so far. But like I said, I do want to emphasize just as much here. Buying the bills has gotten out. We're moving kind of an unrestricted rate. I will talk a little bit about the Obamacare deal and the difficulty in getting it done and where I think it's going to go. People say, why do the Republicans have a plan for it? We did have a plan. Paul Ryan had a plan called the Better Way to Help Care Before. It's something that a lot of Republicans referred to. They ran for office last night. But in order to pass the bill, you need 218 votes in the House and at least 50 votes in the Senate. And that can be a little bit more of a difficult thing to do, because even though a lot of Republicans aren't on board, you can be 50 out of 52 Republicans. The problem is, a lot of Republicans want to get rid of the additional taxes that were used to fund Obamacare. They don't like Obamacare, and they want government out of the healthcare office yet. And I will agree that if the government hadn't been involved so much in healthcare in the first place, overall healthcare costs would be lower, just as things in which government is not involved in things like cosmetic surgery, the cost has fallen over time. I would argue that if the government isn't involved in it, I think that the cost of other things would have fallen online. But unfortunately, government is very involved in healthcare and I think some of the Republicans who want government out all together and we're holding out for that are not going to get that way. On the other hand, you have a lot of people who, not as many as you think, but some people who are dependent right now on Obamacare. And those people are getting a benefit as we take money out of the system and reveal the taxes. Their benefits is going to be less. We are getting some benefits under both plans that I voted for. But if you look at two groups of people, people who want to make sure that, say, the 58-year-old single person benefits, and I recently want to make sure they have health insurance, and those people want to government out all together, you have two kind of diametrically involved positions. When you try to get 52 Republicans on board the Senate, that makes things difficult. I personally am not certain that some of Republican leadership want to reveal Obamacare. I'm going to say it for this reason. He happened to be out on the floor of the state Senate, and John McCain said he was going to vote for the bill and then changed his mind and decided to vote against it. And Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, gave a long speech about how disciplined he was and how brutal he was, but now it's time to move on. But John McCain voted no on that bill. He didn't vote against the bill per se. He voted on process. We should have more committee hearings. We should have more reports before he voted on that bill. But it seems to me that Mitch McConnell really wanted that bill to pass. He would have the committee hearings. He got the reports and brought back the vote. You know, six weeks later, John McCain would have voted yes. They would have wanted to negotiate between the House and the Senate. The fact that he didn't do that on a personal level makes me kind of want to know if they could really not want it on the interview with us and do you want Obamacare to continue. In any event, the Obamacare exchanges are far from art. A substantial number of counties in Wisconsin is only going to have one provider next year. In Iowa, something like 90 out of 94 counties, something like that, will provide it all Obamacare, which means that we'll have a real mess of years. And I think for that reason, something will have to be done. I hate to predict, but you've seen in the paper that Danny Murray of Washington, Alexander of Tennessee, are working on something. I wouldn't be surprised if they come through with something patching together Obamacare for one or two more years to make it work on something. If I had a criticism of the plan that came out of the House, I don't think they did enough to focus on the cost of Obamacare. They just focused on who's going to be. Well, I don't care whether you're the government or whether you're a business trying to provide health care for your employees, whether you're just an individual looking to buy health insurance on the market, the problem is cost. And I think right now the insurance system sometimes encourages people to go to the doctor and have things done that are not necessarily necessary. I think that you can talk to people, private people, the medical system. I'm having my shaboy day, by the way. I started out the statewide with a group of hard-to-date so I talked to them. I talked to hospital administrators all over the district. We had a rory here in Chicago. We talked to the shaboy company pretty few folks and we wrapped it up like three host offices. They shaboyed me a year. But as many people in the medical system with knowledge, sometimes we do things that are actually necessary for the results and revenue coming in. And the goal has to be addressed a lot of times. Larger businesses are addressing a few things like peer-based clinics, they self-insure, they get involved a little bit in wellness. The other employees might cause the health care and educate them which hospital is the best which hospital charges the best. That sort of thing. Some of the government has to make that very important. And the goal has to be by making universal the cost of everything. It's the quality of things. It's your security. I'm disappointed that that wasn't done the first time around. It seems to me the first of the bills that people were done, like I said, I would not double myself because I reckon it's better than the other plans. But it seems too often it was done just to get to the management. To sit at the table and say what do you want? What do you want? What do you want to do? And maybe the other find a fit in there and sell it to the Congress and their sell it to the senators. Hopefully that will take great and will volunteer to be one of those people who I know will probably be on the inside of it but I will be very vulnerable in the next time you go outside We have to have the actual work in this country because right now we're just losing this. We have two big problems. Our corporate income tax is the highest in the industrialized world. Everybody agrees. We are broke out of our mind. We are $20 trillion in debt. I meet the average man when we're a child in this country. It's $60,000 in debt. We're livid. We're livid. We're livid for it. We're at $40,000 in debt. Nevertheless, I am convinced we are losing businesses in this country. I have a high tax rate. And we also, because we're a high tax rate, have something called repaid creation tax, which are one of these big multinational corporations. If you are earning money abroad or even in Puerto Rico, if you bring that money back to the United States to invest, you're going to pay the proper tax in there. So if you're a big company and you're sitting on whatever, $400 billion in Puerto Rico, and you got to decide whether you're going to bring it back and invest in some of the facilities in the United States, or whether you're going to keep it down there and invest in bonds or whatever, right now it's a strong incentive to keep that money growing. We've got to change that incentive. So those are two things that have to be done. More difficult, they, is what the tax is a little bit like when we are done. One of the reasons many things don't get done soon understand is not like any other body I've ever lived. Being the school board of the county board of the state legislature for not everything, but for most things to pass the U.S. Senate, it requires 60 months. So people think the Republicans are in charge of what they're going to shut these states through. For most things it takes eight Democrats in the U.S. Senate to get something done. It complicates the issue overwhelmingly. Occasionally, some of the Democrats, what were the Republicans? If you get eight Democrats, it pretty much means the blessing of Chuck Schumer, who was the Senate party leader, and that slows down a lot of things. It's one of the reasons why you have to deal with not a thing there, by the way. Yeah, and that, but it basically would just pass the bill and get it to play a lot of the vote. Even then, so far, we should have pollution. We should be able to originate here. But it would take 60 votes. In the Senate, sadly, there are enough, they don't want to say extreme, but some of them aren't friends. But people are not going to compromise on environmental issues in the Democratic Party. So in order to get tax reform, we have to get it through a process called reconciliation, which I didn't know about until I got to Congress. And that means that first of all, the House and Senate have to pass the budget saying that we're going to be able to deal with tax reform with 50 votes, 51 votes in the U.S. Senate. And I'll come on to the budget in a second, but when we get there, there are two types of tax reform. You could either change taxes for 10 years and then go back to what they are today. And if you think back when George Bush was president and he had his tax cuts, his tax cuts expired after 10 years. Remember that? And at the time, just sitting back here in Wisconsin, I said, oh, that was dumb. Why did the Bush people not make the tax cuts permanent? Why would you ever, you know, change the tax law to make it good for only 10 years? The reason is, under the rules of the Senate, if you want a tax cut with 51 votes, it can only be for 10 years. If you want a change in the tax code to be permanent, it has to be what they call revenue, not really a tax cut. You can have some tax increases, some tax decreases, simple buy, but you can't have a raw cut taxes. Right now, there are two proposals out there, both of which have their flaws when it's a Trump proposal. One is a congressional proposal with some people that's fair, not a certain proposal. The House Ways and Means Committee is looking at it. I think in both cases, my concern is we want to focus somewhat on the bill class. I think in our society, we're very, very wealthy. I'm very, very wealthy. And sometimes, politicians like to follow with themselves to help the poor, or in some cases, people who are not working in as hard as they could be working. And as a result, the bill class won't get the benefit that they should. That is a concern I am. Another concern I have is they are working towards things in the House plan that I think something tank people like but don't make any sense. I'll give you an example of that. They are talking right now about 100% expensive in real estate. I assume you have a couple of landlords out here and if they don't, what it would mean is if you buy, say, a four family for $200,000, you would immediately get a $200,000 deduction. That's not reflective of what goes on in the real world, because right if you buy in a apartment, you really haven't had a loss, that apartment is still worth $200,000. But there are some people that would encourage people to build more apartments. The same people want to get rid of the mortgage deduction, rental property, and the deduction for property taxes. Now, right now, if you go on rental properties and you use to give them taxes, I kind of wonder if they have return and you still don't visualize the rents being the income. You get deductions on depreciation. You get the deduction for mortgage interest and deduction for property taxes. Well, after they're done with this, after you get the deductions the first year, you've got rental income coming in, but no depreciation or property tax to the mortgage interest, I've said, which is goofy. You stuck with me, congratulations, but it's goofy. It means your, it means your tax revenue has nothing whatever to do with your actual revenue. I think it looks great. And incentive for people to build apartments for no particular purpose. I was doing income tax in the 1980s when we used to have a see-through of the sky-rise of places like Denver and Texas. The reason you built, at the time, you built skyscrapers, well, tenants, because they paid taxes. And I can see this marching towards that again. So that's one concern that I had, and like I said, the other concern that I had is I want to make sure we get built, because I guess they're very sure the tax is not, and I'm not sure if you could recall, so that is true right now, though Donald Trump didn't say last week taxing, somebody's getting to do it. I talked to the staff, and I was like, yeah, I talked to the staff. And I said, I had something to do with that, at least somebody pointed that out to me. So that's what's going on with the taxes. I assume we'll pass the budget, and I assume some sort of tax problem happened by the end of the year. It should, because it should be relative to these. I ran on welfare reform, because I do believe right now our welfare system sadly discourages people from working, certainly discourages people from getting married. I think both those things ought to change. I'm trying to get provisions in the current budget that will cause us to take that up. I'm not sure I'm getting the enthusiasm I want from other Republicans, but it should be something that will just take care, and I'm sure the public is overwhelmed with us on that. The budget itself, I think right now, could be described from my perspective, is a little bit too free-spending. Donald Trump, because they're military, already being military, they have shortages, they have spare parts and things that we have to get them our money. Donald Trump is prepared to give them a 5.5 percent increase. I think when you're as broke as we are, and you're borrowing a 13 percent year budget, 5.5 percent is good. At least General Mattis felt that would be adequate. He had some other armed services come before the budget committee they felt was adequate. A lot of Republicans, though, weighed in with leadership and said they wanted to increase to over 11 percent, which is a substantial increase when you're broke. It looks like Republican leadership is settling in and saying that 9.5 is okay. And to me, I don't think 9.5 is okay, so I'll see what I can do about shading a little bit off of there. Donald Trump was prepared to give a 5.5 percent increase because he was prepared to say we could cut non-defense, what they call discretionary spending, a 7.8 percent. Congress is saying that we gotta cut it by about 1.2 percent. To have a situation where it's both military and non-military, Congress is substantially above what Donald Trump wanted. I don't think there's been enough press on that or the topic, and I think that you've been making some bites up there. If the press was rallying people up and saying, oh, Congress doesn't get a program, Donald Trump was trying to rein in spending. It's not like I can do all of Donald Trump's cuts, but I think I've got a 1 percent cut there, and I keep fighting for that, but that is a place in which the Republican Congress and Donald Trump disagree. And when I was clearly down on Trump, I think it was behaving. His budget did have cuts on things I don't think they should have, but I'll tell you, he gets spending too much money. I don't think Congress is there yet. We don't have the sense of urgency we should have gotten. Okay, there's the budget. There's the tax. There's the Obamacare. We'll, oh, we'll lose today because I know a little bit. Michael Bren was nominated by Donald Trump to be on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Which is good news. A good guy and another good judge we're going to hand, which makes me feel good. With regard to the ozone problems in the EPA, I have been involved with the EPA and expect to see some aggressiveness there that we haven't had in the past. One of the things I'm focusing on is whether they're going to measure ozone and should avoid counting. And to understand, first of all, the air is so much cleaner. He was driving those things. It was way cleaner than everybody understood me. And then, largely and so far, Shpoing has an ozone problems caused by people coming out from south of here. So it seems a lot fair to crack down and get again on Shpoing businesses, as well as the irritating emissions tests. You know what I'm talking about? The ice talk about the effect on entertainment is on the manufacturers, which is true. But I'll tell you. You know, when you have an old Peter Carr and you like to run your car to the end with thousands of bucks for a catalog converter, isn't that irritating? Is that right? And it's really kind of anti-pored. Do you ever think about that? For all the bills that are pushed at it, I'm some poor guy. I'm only a four to fifteen-year-old car and then the government tells me to keep running my car with $1500 in it. In any event, a lot of these people sometimes come around here and when they measure whether or not Shpoing does not attain them, they put the monitors right on their machine. And for whatever reason, you always get higher, higher on the ozone readings right along the way. If you put the monitor in the middle of the county, say in Plymouth, where it should be, then you'd be in entertainment. But they put them right, I know in Ozaki County, they put it in with some heart rate. They put it right on where Harrington Beach goes out. And like Michigan, they put the monitor way out there on the lake to make sure that they get a battery. I mean, I'm going to work on it where they put the monitors forward and nobody lives. That's right. So why are we measuring that? Just because they like to flaunt people. It'd be like a high school teacher getting a not necessarily strict test just because they'd like to have kids stand, right? But I'm going to work on it where they put the monitors and see what I can do there. So that in general is what's going on. I do continue, like I said, look out for manufacturing. When we do the tax reform right now, manufacturers and construction and agriculture get a special credit, which does help them a little. A lot of times in an effort to simplify things, they're willing to get rid of that credit. I have no problem with benefiting manufacturing. To me, manufacturing is what makes you a public. And everybody else goes up as long as you're making stuff and you're not making stuff. Everybody else goes on. So I tell the manufacturers, don't give up that credit without getting something back because if you do have that credit, it's gone for good. I always believe strongly in manufacturing. We do in my state, but right now this district that I have of the 435 congressmen has more manufacturing jobs than the rest of the country. Which is kind of amazing. That's something we should know. My district has the most, which it does, but Wisconsin collectively of the 50 states has the second highest percentage of employees in manufacturing. Just kind of neat. I didn't just know that. You know, you grow up here, they talk about cheese ads, and you think, yeah, we got all the corn farms around here. You don't realize that manufacturing, the only state with more is Indiana. And it's really close and there's a drop way into Michigan. So big stuff for Wisconsin, so it's good that they have me because I'm a pro-manufacturer and manufacturing is so important to this area. But that's kind of it. I should look at the time, we'll take a couple of questions soon. See what else they can tell you. Donald Trump, people ask me about Donald Trump. I think he shouldn't do it so much. And when I get around the district on weekends and I come back every weekend, I always get people talking about Michigan. People always say, Len, what do you want to talk to people? And really when I get around to my festivals or breaks or whatever, people basically want to talk about, you know, how's the weather or something like that they don't want to talk about, right, in Washington. So to get them going, I always say, if I see Donald Trump for two minutes this week, what should I tell them? I have an 80% of the time, it's not going to be so much. Well, a lot of people are always saying, keep going, he's doing the right thing. And when I did meet him, that's what I told people in the streets. I should hopefully appreciate it. I got like one minute with him. I'm still hoping to get 15 minutes or an hour with him, I don't know, one minute. I use that. But he thoroughly loves people. I mean, if you're seeing one of these rallies, he would just, he would do the rope line all week. I mean, this picture taken with him was like this good thing. During the campaign, I got to meet him a few times, you know, Claire and Green Bay. And it was kind of different than what I thought, that he spent so much of the time asking me what he ought to do. So that was kind of a cool thing, you know, where should I go next time in Wisconsin? What should I do in Wisconsin? Which is kind of a cool thing. And so that's what I want to know about him. He is much more hands-on with the Congressman Barack Obama. He, during the Obamacare stuff, he would call Congressman, you know, eight or nine o'clock at night and ask him for their vote, which I think is kind of, do you think that the President of the Senate or Congress was like, oh, who's that? Hello, it's Donald Trump. But, and I will leave that because once during the campaign, when my endorsement was driving the car and picked up a phone, and I was driving the car in the form of Donald Trump, you know, I wouldn't guess. So I think, so, I believe that's what he's doing there, which is, I think, like I said, apparently Barack Obama is much more with your hand, staff, hand with it, and Donald Trump is not the same. Now, I should, I should ask questions. What is the question? Do you have anybody, want to raise their hand and ask a question? Yes. I'm trying to just start to comment. Do you think you can figure it out here? In this, I'm not, you know, you practically said we've got a voter shortage. And then, again, said we've got sort of the immigration reform and obviously the foundation for Homeland Security and all that, but at the same time, some of the rhetoric seems to be affecting the ability to open up. Well, on immigration, it seems to be obvious. We do need workers, right, in part because their jobs a lot of them don't want to do, even in jobs people want to do, there'll be a shortage. I mean, if I went through all the industrial parks like around here, I bet 90% of the employers would say we can't like that. I hope we have the ability to pass immigration. So when we do it, part of it has to be, we've got to stop having people coming here illegally. I mean, there are extra many wonderful people who are illegal immigrants who are working, but why shouldn't they all, right? And if you talk to some of the people in social services, some people taking advantage of our benefits, are, you know, why would we under any circumstances take somebody here to go on a vote? There are people coming here legally who are taking advantage of our medical systems and show up in the emergency room. And given the out of control cost we have on health care, it's expensive enough to provide health care for people who are providing health care for the world. Talk to some of the prison guards at Oxford Federal Prison. I mean, they see, you know, some of the illegal immigrants which we should be in. So I think the important thing is to make sure in the future we are taking the best, because we are the best in the whole world, not whole world, but we should have no problem making sure that the people who come here are going to be able, every one of which is adding to society. And at least when I was a child growing up, you would hear that the first generation, the children of the immigrants, burned more than they did more, which is because they came here with that special immigrant drive, they came here lying on the ground running and really had a lot to work on. And that should be the goal. And for whatever reason, we have largely nowhere near enforced our borders, like we showed you in the last 30 years. And that's why we're in a mess in the first place. That's because a lot of politicians, whatever they say, appear on the light of the idea of picking their immigrants by whoever wants to break the law. That's not a good way to pick your immigrants. Oh, somebody's got to be thinking something. You can turn on the news every night, you're going to be eating a stew or a cup. Any thoughts on that? Yeah. I like Reint, and I'm sure he's going to wind up on his feet because he's so hard working as such great organizational skills. I think General Kelly, furthermore, I'm really glad and scared of who she was about because he was not who he needed. And I think General Kelly, given his background, you can't help but be a little bit more of him, can you? And I think insofar as one of the jobs to change the staff is to kind of rame in some of the tweets a little. I think General Kelly, as much as I love Reint, and I will do whatever I can for him, I think he may wind up doing a little better job on that. I know Reint's been trying. I talked to him, he tried, and he did a lot of good. But in that regard, it made me look back, you know, two years from now and say, the day General Kelly's look over is a good day for America, and a good day for me. Yes? Hi, I know we have an education committee. We have an education secretary who calls public education a dead end. I'm wondering if you read the facts with the people in this room who are easily involved in some very successful public schools. I'm going to just graduate from Alcarte, she's looking like, she's got a degree as a dead end. I don't think we can afford to fund private vouchers schools along with public education. So are they dead ends? No, I don't know which context she said that. I'm looking forward to having her come before the education committee so I can ask her some questions. I do not like increased federal role in education, and I made that clear to her when we met in the formal meeting. Last year, in a mild success, we did have something called the Student Success Act, which I just let every local superintendent see happy with because of these less federal paperwork, less federal involvement in education. Some of us are a little disappointed in that we feel she hasn't done all she could with that act to reduce federal involvement in education. My mom's a teacher. I went to public schools. You can tell me afterwards whether you think that you're not okay or not. But I don't think public education is a dead end. Congressman, I'd like to thank you for many of the projects that you've championed to help the city out with some of the things we're trying to do. Specifically, the Long Marine Sanctuary, we appreciate you signing on to the Russian letter to support the designation of sanctuary off the coast of Sheboygan Manor to Washington to Rivers and Mackwine. Also, our community block grant funds are in jeopardy, which President Trump is trying to eliminate those. And that brings about $750,000 a year to the city to help with our neighborhood revitalization programs. And we appreciate you fighting to at least keep it to a modest decrease rather than eliminating that program. And then there's also the GLRI funding, the city and the county did a project with the line with the EPA and other federal agencies in the state to clean up the Sheboygan River. We drew down $58 million worth of that GLRI funding to accomplish that project. There's smaller projects that we're still able to use that funding for. More importantly, many other communities need to clean up their EPA superfund site scenario concern and those need to be funded as well. So thank you for all your efforts. Well, you know I was a part of a bring back. I agree with you and could have had a small cut on community block grants. I don't even know you're going to get a small cut. You know, you're so broke. I think there shouldn't be small cuts all over the place. So we're never going to, you know, get where we have to get. But it's apparent that, you know, you're not going to have a big cut down from one. I think what happened in some of these 100% cuts in his budget, he's a new president, he's got to slap together a budget in two months and maybe some of them were a little bit, not as thought out as they should be, but on the other hand, there are other more barriers that we're going to cut a little bit more. So I'm conscious of all of this and I think I was a part instrumental in the budget. Just talking about cost cuts, budget and cost cuts, where do you see two or three of the most critical areas where you can get little impact? I don't believe just to say but it is clear as you look at the budget and you look for big dollar figures, our transfer payments, means-based transfer payments are great. We have to make sure we don't hurt the people who are genuinely vulnerable or can't defend themselves. But there is a certain amount of evidence out there that you will find if you just talk to people in this room who can't be believed. There are people who are, you can see them falling into a trap because I don't think that's much of a lifestyle to what I call a welfare lifestyle. I think there is the ability there to have substantial reductions as a big dollar figure and when you're borrowing like 13% of your budget, I think bureaucracies could also be looked at again. I always hoped to try to have cuts there and I think on the military, we are not going to be able, we shouldn't be going up by 90% or so. By the way, even more if you're a dean on that military thing, they're going to do it completely odd enough before you have that big up or which you didn't buy. Okay, anybody else? Conn? Okay, what time is it? Yeah, I think one thing that I didn't used to realize, somebody else said, I didn't realize the degree to which when you produce a finished product, the huge number of jobs at the facilities that give the parts and supplies or whatever to the final manufacturer. If you can talk about coal or company or mercury, you can talk about the jobs in most facilities, but there's another four or five jobs in other manufacturing facilities that provide for the people put together. Given the huge amount of manufacturing we have around here, I'd be shocked if they were on my job. Fine, somebody think of something. Ask me for my favorite color. Ask me what you have to dog at night. I guess there are two that come to mind. In this job, Congressman, I didn't go abroad the first two years because I didn't go abroad much, but I talked to a lot of my colleagues who didn't almost go abroad, and they felt the trip they liked the best was Israel. So I would be going to Israel. I also kind of want to go to China because it's so significant for this international world, and I think it's important to have good relations with China, and I guess the more Congressmen we have going over there emphasize that we have a good relationship with China, the better. So sometimes we have to go to China, so it's all right, you need some lessons. Okay, thank you much. Always enjoyable.