 to violent politics and 21st century implications for society. In this session, we are going to discuss that what do we understand by the violent politics and specifically in context of the 21st century and what type of implications this violent politics has. And definitely the study of political violence is the essential sphere of political sociology because politics of violence, political use of violence and then definitely the terrorism in the 21st century, they all are becoming the serious concerns for the political sociologists. In this context, Hooke has explained that the blind spot classical social thought resulted in obstructing war and failure of integration war in into the social theory. If we look at the history of the masses, there were wars in them but the wars were not studied in such a way that their social context was discussed above them. The wars were discussed on the basis of the government, but the political sociology context should have been debated. There we sometimes feel the literature. So in the case of violence, now the major focus is on the domestic and neglecting international arena. Again, resulted in the in this situation that the history of violence and then due to violence between the states and then their impact on the atmosphere, the literature related to it, what are the debates, what are all the ideas that philosophers and political sociologists have talked about in this context. This is such an important and critical area on which to build such an approach for the violence to be historically linked to society. First, the wars that were fought by the states, now what has been changed is the violence within the society, the terrorism, the extremism within the society, about how it will be traced out and then the literature on it, how it will be available, how some of the approaches will be conceptual clarity which today wants to study these concepts. Because only focusing on the state as unit analysis, limited discussion circle of the important issues such as human rights abuses, genocide, and the role of warfare in bringing globalization. Because with the passage of time, there are various issues, those remained under discussion, like where there will be a violation of human rights, there will be a reaction on it, where there will be genocide, that is, if the state kills people, there will be a reaction on it. And then definitely, the warfare related to all the developments in those countries, its response also comes and the reaction also comes. So we can say that although there are some political sociologists, those are talking about on such developments, but there are certain philosophers, those are not agree with the concept that the idea of state monopoly over the use of violence. That is, some people think that if the state has this power and it exercises that power to snub the different voices, those have the difference of opinion with the state authority, then the state can suppress those voices. But there are many political sociologists, they are anti-philosophy. They think that the state authority, but it is a legal authority, cannot be allowed to say that if someone divorces it, then its voice can be suppressed. So if the state policies are being caused by violence, then it is very important for them for proper debate on political sociology and development.