 Today, an empire, cop bots, MSM compliance, and McCall's embarrassing Taiwan admission. There's too much interesting stuff happening in the life of the empire to cover in just one article today, so we're doing a 3-in-1 wrap up. Number one, McCall says war over Taiwan will be about controlling microchips, or I mean democracy and freedom. Republican congressman Michael McCall made a very interesting admission during a Sunday interview on MSNBC, which he hastily had to walk back after the host pointed out the implications of what he was saying. MSNBC's Chuck Todd asked the virulent China hawk McCall to make the basic case for why Americans should be willing to go to war over Taiwan, and McCall responded by saying it was about controlling the manufacturing of microchips. When Todd pointed out that this sounded a lot like justifications that have been made for US wars and militarism to control global oil supplies, McCall hastily corrected himself and said that protecting Taiwan is actually about democracy and freedom. Make the basic case for why Americans not only should care about what happens in Taiwan, but should be willing to spill American blood and treasure to defend Taiwan, Todd said. McCall responded by talking about deterrence and protecting international trade, then said, I think more importantly, is that TSMC manufactures 90% of the global supply of advanced semiconductor chips. If China invades and either owns or breaks up, we're in a world of hurt globally. Congressman, that almost sounds like the case that would have been made in the 60s, 70s, and 80s for why America was spending so much money and military resources in the Middle East, Todd responded. Oil was so important for the economy. Is this sort of the 21st century version of that? You know, I personally think it is about democracy and freedom, and we need to stand up for that, like we're doing in Ukraine, said McCall, visibly uncomfortable. Nearly as funny as McCall's hasty self-correction was Todd's suggestion that US militarism and wars for oil in the Middle East was something that was limited to the 60s, 70s, and 80s. As though the destruction of Iraq and Libya, the militarization against Iran, the starvation of Yemen, and the occupation of Syrian oil fields are just things the US war machine has been doing for fun and giggles in the decades since. Also funny is the suggestion that Taiwan falling under Beijing's control would create a world of hurt, as though China has ever been reluctant to sell manufactured products to other countries, and as though the world has not been freely purchasing those products. 2. Mass media refrain from sharing Pentagon leaks after the White House told them not to. In an article titled White House Says Don't Report on Pentagon Leaks, anti-war's Dave DeKamp writes the following, quote, The White House on Monday warned media outlets against publishing information contained in the top secret documents leaked from the Pentagon and other US government agencies that have surfaced on the internet. Without confirming the validity of the documents, this is information that has no business in the public domain, White House national security spokesman John Kirby told reporters. It has no business, if you don't mind me saying, on the pages of front pages of newspapers or on television. It is not intended for public consumption, and it should not be out there, he added, end quote. So that was on Monday. On Tuesday morning, Fox News correspondent Jennifer Griffin said that Fox News has agreed, along with other news organizations, not to publish the leaked, highly classified documents which were discovered last week. Griffin made no mention of which other news organizations had agreed to this. Western journalism, ladies and gents. Number three, NYPD adds cop bots to its arsenal. NBC New York reports that the New York police department has added a robot dog to its force, along with other robots, after previously abandoning their use in the face of public outcry. Now before we move on, it must be said that the press really need to stop calling these things robotic dogs like they're some cute cartoon character from the Jetsons. They're not dogs, they're robots, police robots. Calling quadrupedal cop bots dogs is a marketing ploy by those who profit from them and those who want to use them. Reporting that the robotic dog will be used in hostage negotiations, counter-terrorism incidents and other situations as needed, NBC New York notes that the robot's use is being pushed through despite widespread public objections. Mayor Eric Adams said that although the robotic dog was previously introduced during a previous administration, leaders then took a step back after public outcry. However, he said that his top concern is public safety, the report reads. This announcement is also another example of the NYPD's violation of basic norms of transparency and accountability by rolling out these technologies without providing the public a meaningful opportunity to raise concerns. The Legal Aid Society is quoted as saying an objection to the move. Another piece of tech called the K5 Autonomous Security Robot is also being rolled out alongside the quadrupedal robot, which NBC New York reports uses artificial intelligence to provide incident notification in real time to first responders and will be used to conduct automated patrol and confined areas both indoors and outdoors, such as transit stations. So surveillance, it's a surveillance robot. Every few months I've got to write a new article about new escalations and cop-bot normalization because it's being shoved through with such extreme aggression. It's been decided that there need to be cop-bots, so the world is getting cop-bots. Whenever a new story breaks about these escalations, people always joke about movies where the robots turn against the humans, but that's not the real danger here. The real danger is that these robots will be fully controlled by humans and humans have a long track record of oppressing and abusing other humans. This isn't Terminator or Black Mirror. This is Garden Variety police militarization, continuing along the same trajectory it's been on for decades. Every objection to police militarization as a dangerous slippery slope has been 100% vindicated by history, and there's no reason to expect that to change as they start rolling out cop-bots. As John and Nisha Whitehead explained last year for the Rutherford Institute, this ongoing expansion of police robot militarization tracks alongside the steadily increasing militarization of police forces in the U.S. more generally. SWAT teams first appeared in California in the 1960s. By 1980, the U.S. was seeing 3,000 SWAT team-style raids per year, and by 2014 that number had soared to 80,000. It's probably higher now. The thing about slippery slope arguments is you can't just dismiss them on issues where they have a proven and consistent track record of being correct. Police forces have been getting more and more militarized, especially in the U.S., and once they've secured an escalation in militarization, it seldom de-escalates from there. Since the dawn of history, rulers have dreamed of having mindless obedient soldiers who will never turn against them, will never disobey orders, and will never hesitate to attack the civilians of their own country when told to do so. Cop-bots are the final solution to the ancient problem that there are always a whole lot more ordinary people than there are rulers. Because once they're fully militarized and fully rolled out, they can be used to subdue a population of any size. Cop-bots are the anti-gyatine. Humanity is an erase between the awakening of our consciousness on one hand and the plunge toward Armageddon and dystopia on the other. I hope we can wake up and turn this thing around before we're locked into this sinking ship for good.