 What's the history here that has led to this being such a problem that just doesn't go away? I think there's a security versus security debate that's been going on since the early 90s. I mean, on the one hand, there's security in the fact that we have secure communications and devices. And there's security in the fact that the police can investigate crimes. And that's something that people have wrestled with. And if you are the police, what you think about is solving crimes and that is your perspective. So you're gonna choose a solution that has less security communications and more security for law enforcement. And that's what happened in the early 90s. We had a clipper chip. I pulled out my book that's about 25 years old and I write about it. This is 1993, Cindy was there, we were there. And then there it was secure telephones. You look at crypto war number, I think it's two or three, which is the iPhone versus the FBI and that's encrypted storage. And now we're talking about message platforms. And so you're looking at what's more important, right? The ability to break into these things which has value in solving crimes, even though it gives insecurity for all some other reasons, or do you want these things secure, which harm solving crimes, but give security in other ways?