 I think it's interesting the way you highlight some of these explicitly partisan aspects of this financial system. I think it's interesting with some of the parallels out there right now on the degree to which the need to create parallel institutions, the fears of, say, people on the right having the banking system use them by progressive woke capital or whatever. That really was the setting here. You had Aaron Burr's bank in New York City going up against Hamilton's bank and the attempts of using the legislature to benefit one at the expense of others. Similar things playing out explicitly Republican banks in Pennsylvania, going against explicitly Federalist banks in Pennsylvania. You really do see the degree to which a partisanship is completely dividing these institutions. I think it's also important because it's the same sort of thing that's happening within the press, newspapers. In fact, something I meant to mention earlier is that one of those other signs of moderation from Jefferson was simply the decision to go with a more moderate Republican newspaper as sort of the newspaper of choice over those radical. When we're talking about these partisan party systems here in the 18th century, the 19th century, these really are parallel tracks rather than sort of this politics as sort of theater where in the 20th century, the two parties, they disagree in public, but there's a lot of agreement behind the scenes. Here there really was divides and separation depending upon where you're political loyalty was. That's a great point. It's a fantastic illustration of the differences between politics back in the day and politics now where politics, it was fiercely competitive in a sense that you took sides. You just really tried to bring out the faithful in elections and whichever side brought out more of its faithful won the election. In that one way, you would communicate to the faithful was through these newspapers. As a side note, I love newspapers. If you actually look at old newspapers in the 1800s, they always had a section, it's huge paper. They had pages and they always had a section that would take up one page and it was sort of collections of all sorts of other little one or two sentence lines from other like-minded newspapers. It was like a collection of tweets. You could scroll and you would see it's like a lot of newspapers. They would just collect various information from other newspapers, et cetera. I just always found that as like, oh, well, it was like the Twitter of back in the day. You'd be updating these once a day and so on. But yeah, having Jefferson, he chose to, I think it was the national intelligentser, was his preferred newspaper as opposed to the Aurora. This was upsetting. The national intelligentser basically became, as time went on, it became sort of the dispokesman for cronyism and the swamp. It would basically support Congress's various special interest legislation and the newspaper saying, oh, this is going to benefit the public. This is a good thing, et cetera. In return, Congress would grant it, it would give it various lucrative contracts for printing documents. The actual publishing house of the newspaper, this happened at the state level as well as the federal level. Really clear example of the alliance of throne and altar, right? This is like media's corrupt now and it was corrupt back then where they would support these policies in return. The Congress would give them these printing contracts that, they would literally be, you get a 40% rate of return. These extremely lucrative printing contracts that you're like, oh, well, of course you're going to go for the bait and yeah, that was an issue. The Jeffersonian era is really, it's just a great example of a missed opportunity. Some notable advances were made by Gallatin, et cetera, but during these early years, it was really moderation, but there was still a downward trend in cronies. It was more instead of being a total hack and slash, it was really just kind of a slow whittling away, but unfortunately matters sort of took a turn for the worst, really beginning with the Louisiana Purchase, which is a whole story into itself.