 I had a question and I'm not sure what you did there and it doesn't remind you, but do you know? I don't know. Just in regard to the defense of the country, it seemed to me that I thought it would be contracts and defense contracts would be a country in the wild, so to speak. It might be some business contracts, but it's just a contract with a certain amount. Contracts, right? With a much bigger problem than how to come to the defense, to have a presence, and to do that very quickly. We need a situation where the bigger country gets money, and the smaller country gets the money. Do you have any questions about that? Of course, I'm sorry that the defense are loyal, but it was quite common with this. Actually, some guys in the United States thought it would be a business contract, but none of the people in the military called it a defense contract. Contracts were in the Palermo, in the city of San Bernardino, from the United States. And actually, what I heard yesterday, it occurred to me that it was an negotiating ball, a sign in the room to the defense, a paper, actually, so it's not explicitly prior to what I said, but it's very similar. And actually, today, it's all about the situation right now, because it actually has no real military forces in power, not understanding that. And actually, the U.S. is kind of very protective of ours. So I think that it's important that this is not a practice, and it's quite a valid solution. But in practice, I must say that these contracts have quite different economic dependence, because sometimes there's a normal contract, and you're just invited to come on the floor, even the state's economic dependence, which there is, as a protector, and in some cases, that's not a sign which fully I am going to pay. You know, you're protected against the public, and being, like, needed is not a solution, because there are the taxes all just coming from profession. So I think that's one challenge. Could I comment on that? Yeah. Actually, that's a really bad idea. The whole idea of collective security only spreads towards making contracts, saying that the U.S. by joining NATO, as the bulk of nations have, what you do is that you ensure that we're going to have a call for two. I mean, the biggest bully on earth is the U.S. government. I mean, no other government has gone around invading countries and actually setting up a principle of preemption. I mean, it's just unprecedented evidence, so that when you're talking about bullies, you really have to start with the capital, the world capital of bullyingism, is Washington, D.C. And, you know, so I was kind of starting to see Putin up there, and not George W. Bush. One is the teacher, and one is the student. Well, maybe you want to look into the U.S. to start. Actually, Russian Federation, because I think it's very American-centric, and I do understand it when you're living in America, that your own power is useful. But, you know, it's like, obviously, the Russian Federation is very good. I mean, I haven't seen the Russian Federation invading any bulk of countries, and I've seen no profit in doing that, but by Estonia joining NATO, that is the competition. I mean, NATO should be abolished. And, you know, the U.N., I mean, the U.S. should pull out the NATO. Of course, NATO was founded to ostensibly, you know, defend against so-called Soviet expansionists. But, in fact, I mean, didn't Soviet Union resolve? I mean, there is no more communism, so there's no more reason for NATO to exist. If there never was a reason, we're trying to very much step. So, and, plus, you know, what we were talking about with the free writer, but what they're writing about is my cockerel. That's what we're talking about. So, you know, I mean, thanks for knowing that. Well, when you write down to an attitude of concert, it seems to be a vital expectancy between Wade, Justin, and Robert from the portage that's going on in Europe and the United States. And Justin predicted the American media as being the only hostile Iran call, which is exactly what I remember. That is, I mean, both of us commented on this. A lot of writers held hostile to Turkey. When you, you know, in Iran, gave the impression that this was somehow more characteristic of European, but I don't think it was very much of that. Honestly, I wonder, there was probably not much difference. Would you agree with the European press with this even more contentious and delightful in terms of reporting on Paul's candidacy? Well, basically, the European press did their best to join and they had an easier job ignoring him because the Americans were, well, you know, the media were, more or less, ignoring him or his family. So, but then it was, well, which one is the most likely, which ones are the most likely? I think it was the Democrats. I'm going to report about that. I think the differences between their issue, which this one called some strange, it's not weird that you don't understand that. So there's an effort involved in understanding what it's actually talking about. And if you've got a stupid timeline and everyone else in the country you're reporting about, you're talking about all the others, there's not much, and it seems to be starting to talk about this weird guy. So he was largely ignored. So there may be, you know, half-sentence of a normal legal article of what 500 blizzards said that half-sentence of a real storm pool would be strange. That was it. You're ready? Well, I think it's one of the, again, with the short comment, the question was, the comment is that I can see that okay, now comes the Washington decision. But I would like to point out to Justin that it was not the United States or the Ethiopian third Germany on the如 비anding alongside theNET it was Soviet Union, and President of Russian server today saying that Soviet Union was the greatest country in the world. And everything who was there was very good. So that's why Iqual Jang put blood in the smith, and you know this kind of thing. It's not that I'm reading it right, I'll leave it down. By the way, let me just say, let's just say that all the small countries of Europe should have a system of collective defense, taking the big bullies, the people of the bullies, Russia should be able to do something about the story because it was created in 1944. But what do you think if, for example, instead of a native who would have small countries with an elective population for the natives? For example, both the States and Eastern Europe, when this is like about 23 Eastern European countries who have a system of people that, Eastern European democracy union, hey, whoa, whoa. I mean, I'm getting awfully tired hearing about how Putin is, you know, he used to talk a lot. And Russia, his demographic, he's shrinking, okay? You know, the Soviet Union is over. And I mean, Russia is lucky if it survives into the 27th century as a unitary state. And if you look at what is happening, the West is encircling Russia, deliberately as a strategy, okay? They have a NATO, NATO is at the gates of Moscow. Number one, Georgia is about to enter NATO. Kyrgyzstan is about to enter NATO. We have bases all around, and every day we have George W. Bush or some neo-con in the State Department or elsewhere saying, yes, Russia is backsliding. Well, Russia is not on the backsliding given that they're coming out of county years of the most unpresident authoritarian government ever. And you know what? I don't think that Putin personally killed all those with aliens. This is just emotional demagoguery. And you know, if we have a second cold war, it'll be because well-meaning people are mounting this rhetoric. And that's all you're doing. The neo-cons hate Russia, and that is their next goal. They want the oil in central Asia. They want more bases. And that's their agenda. And if you want to sign on to it, you're welcome to do it, I know. And I'm very, very surprised because, I mean, we are on the side of liberty. Why do you think Georgia's already training? So these are many women that should make them. And it's because they want the larger total push there, because they're very much afraid of that evil coming from coming. Yes, yes. Besides that, I thought a couple of days ago I talked to a friend of mine who's from Moscow. And I talked to him about I had to do the solution then, but he said, okay, I haven't been fighting in Moscow. I hate Russia. So should I embrace Russia from the push then? Or if you're kidding, Georgia will push and I don't like it as well. So should I support China's old pastime? Or no, no, no, no, no, no, no. No one's saying you should support the more China. But that's what you do. No, no, I'm not. I don't call them that. What I am saying is that we ought not to declare Cold War II before anybody does anything. And well, I mean, who is promoting cruel? But it's going to be empirical facts. We, the China or not, you're going to live in any great Georgians who've made us think of Andrew. It's kind of like you should decide that in what you could decide you should be. Why don't you just, look, I'm saying that I don't want to subsidize their defense. And I don't want, I don't want the US out of NATO. I mean, well, if you want to defend yourselves, all right, if Georgia feels it, must have Al-Qaizia, even though Al-Qaizia is not part of Georgia, and it must have South Ossetia, even though the South Ossetians don't want to be part of Georgia. I mean, what about secessionism? If Kosovo can be independent, why not South Ossetia? You know, I'm fine. You're fine. You're fine. That's not a question, please. Robert, in America, on the heels of Ron Paul's message, the Ron Paul demand to my face, message, we have about half a dozen candidates who call the South Ron Paul Republicans. Do you anywhere in the European scene see Ron Paul candidates demurging? Well, in one word, no. At least not yet. The difficulty, of course, with Europe is that in America, you have this centralized system with that one person who is aiming at the center. So he is a pointer to which a point is looking, and we have now the European Union, but it doesn't have this presidency. And even if you did, we're all 27 different countries with, I don't know, how many different languages, which makes it much more difficult for some such elements to emerge. And because Europe is looking at the American situation, we're just, if those that are convinced by Ron Paul, we still are looking for possibilities to express this, but I can't see at the moment that it could be anything candidate, at least not in Germany, not because it's sort of... Even there, we have president that he's not elected directly, so he has to go through the system first, very much more than in America, and same as the Britain, similarly, and certainly in France, they had their director, but I can't see that emerging in the near future. There will be different forms of... I'm sorry I'm speaking in some way, but I can't see that's the kind of development yet. I can't see that. So I think you must talk about the situation, because you are very well informed about the problems you're dealing with. I think there are several... these coming from the LGBT project, and I don't think that because our institution, the political institution, the thing that was on the ground, the thing that was on the ground, and I don't think that is what you said to be a real life for the people around the nation, any wrong information. Do you have a question? He wants to announce it, he wants to talk to you. Oh, okay. I'll go with me the outside, okay? I don't know. Any other questions? If you got to the one before the euro, it occurred to me in that session that it's always a friendship, it's always a friend, and regardless of language, if you want to promote it, it's a friend, so can you comment on that? It certainly has all the characteristics of a friend. I envision sort of the franchise-like structures where people work independently and desensitize and find their own ways of expression, which may, especially in Europe, be mainly outside of the official political sphere, but having a great effect on the political sphere by using the websites and blogs to organize events that have great publicity value, and so in this way, promoting the brand, yes. I have a question. Okay. We would be able to go for a call, but should we then go for Mr. Barr? What can Mr. Barr share? Mr. Barr? They're not in the hands of it. I'm very much not going to say about two or three weeks, but I didn't do very much on that, but I'll pass that question to you. I mean, why are you at Barr, and you're not going to be at Barr? No, we actually thought Barr is a continuation of the Ronald Hall Revolution, but again, I mean, Ronald Hall really rose because he's such an unlikely underdog. I mean, he's modest. It's not all about him, and it's just about my ideas. I mean, Barr is much more of a politician and he has a long record. I mean, he was the leader of the impeachment campaign in the House of Representatives, and then your call, like the Americans in the audience, and so, I mean, he's not Ronald Hall. So, you know, I mean, it's not the brand, I mean, it's not the same brand. I tend to see young people going crazy from off on. So, I mean, it's really too bad that Ronald is not Ronald as a third party candidate, but he's getting ardent years, and you know, he wants to rest but yeah, Bob Barr is great, and if he gets nominated, I think he didn't have a convention because it didn't have anything to do with it. Right, yeah, it's going on right now. Who knows what the lack goes and what the party are going to do in their record. So, you know, I mean, somebody else can get a nomination, but I mean, I'm at the support of Bob Barr as a party individual. So, yeah, Bob Barr, go. Question to the leaders. And in continuation of our question of should we make and who should be made and should there be an answer to the answers, what is your position to make this a fight with the National League of Small Nations and would they act as if we put it in if they are all, you know, gather up and try to do things like we use this country or bigger size country? No, of course I did. Entering nature in consenting some kind of collective defence and actually put up different states. Actually, what would be the base or how would you say the base of entering nature, like constant pressure to increase defence budgets up to 2% which is still lower because of the resistance to India and pressure to increase it and with the recent recession then we of course are like a mile to push to participate in non-native but collective kind of defence actions in Iran or Bosnia or in Afghanistan and we think it's what we do and of course I'm against that but on the other hand, there are some circumstances and it's kind of understandable that citizens of small countries let's say in Australia they do not hear so much about how stupid I can go just right. If we want to invest money or spend money on some kind of neighbor or whatever the situation is okay, why not spend on our security that of course is free-riding when you are back-staring but no, if you are willing to pay this money I do not have to care for this so it's kind of your problem and I can't I already know a little bit more about this I can easily understand what you mean by provocation because there are some people and some tens of states in India which are constantly being provoked even though the civil actions concerning a lot of people or other kind of states are not just provocation and speaking about like this a statistic in our stories about senior revolutions which are stated as well a lot of kind of revolutions are not as high as ours but actually I see that in order to have this kind of revolution successful you have to have this kind of from Sanctuary because in this case for example in this in the story from a movie that say about Estonia there are parts of the story that who was after became a president of Austria was the chief of one bit of a government in Estonia and actually he ordered his soldiers to stay inside not to act of course singing peaceful people and in some cases again it was a concern and the same was like in British and Indian popular relations and the same was in Nazi Germany attitudes towards the Asians or citizens of Netherlands because they treated it somehow as higher than those of Poland or Belarusia and he meant that so Danish people were able to become successful in peaceful environment but it depends on how much the attitude of them and so the best is very nice and one last reminder that we have to be very cautious about collective security or national security because all these concepts collective security, national security centralized security, plan security background security all are different concepts and a kind of collective security I agree with my neighbor that actually it's up to each other or really they are trans-Asians it's also kind of collective security we have to look at other aspects of all this so collective security as such doesn't mean that it's centralized security or the next period of money to pass so these are completely different things I can just answer that if you want to know what the provocation is it's called the missile defense shield which means that now in Czechoslovakia Poland and throughout Eastern Europe there is a system in place which would enable the West to conduct a nuclear first strike on Russia so they consider that a provocation they consider that a provocation and they feel endangered especially in the context of the warm-up of the rhetoric and anti-Russian rhetoric coming out of the White House and many of the media outlets and as far as supporting a collective security I would refer you to Robert on the eagles of collective security and starting very briefly was that this threats but it happens these all these alliances that what started it out as a brushfire may turn into a conflict may turn into a confrontation or a war that's how World War I started and no one was advocating and finally I just want to say that I know you don't care whether you're oppressing U.S. taxpayers but I know that internationalism is not reciprocal so you want us to protect you but you don't care if you're oppressed if you want to stay I mean that is a you don't care I want to have a follow-up no no no thanks actually one thing I just come back to the use of warrants a little bit and also some things that there's going to be a very interesting show here it seems to me that there was actually an attempt between the warrants just a couple of attempts at all states there was the little on con there was the Balkan pact and it was one or at least one other similar kind of agreement and of course they were they failed in fact the international independence of those states and I came to the reason that they failed and the reason that these kinds of warrants failed in the past you don't even have to but I think this is really the key and that is in street trade that it was lacking in the interwar period the reason why the reason why these types of security among those small states ultimately failed because they weren't matched military agreements military cooperation such as it was between the different successor states that were not that weren't matched by similar economic integration between those states so one of the things that you posited that I thought could be a very fruitful line of inquiry is whether or not ultimately the only real defense of a small country against a larger neighbor or imperial minded threat is to encourage invested by it to make it in the material best interest of that country not to not to attack a small country like Estonia or what have you now my question though is that this sounds to me I mean I'm very attracted to this proposition but I'm wondering if the flip side of this is that sort of anyway nationalists have always regarded foreign investment not some kind of denying way of fostering cooperation because foreign investment has a bullying now what I'm wondering I guess my question to you is given this both impurely and theoretically what do you think in the case of Baltic states which I'm actually most familiar with but you can expect in some other areas which made an experience I'm just curious to one degree the climate for this really exists currently in the way that Russia should be interested in investing in the way that in general perception of that investment would be as yet another time in Russian bullying or if you take the email of this way fostering a sort of peaceful relations with Russia Thanks. Thank you I also think that this one of the main points about the stress but I would say that this is not acceptable majority of the relations should think better unfortunately and as you just mentioned some examples of where you have a huge oil requirement between which is connected with Russia or French pipeline which is by its oil and this is a requirement twice sold to foreign investors because first of all it was sold to an American company with huge pressure from the U.S. and the same time and it was like a slogan that you know the pipe it will not let the pipe the pipe means like a symbol of a Russian international investor and actually a person from Ukraine and actually if we let Ukraine into the factory it would be like some kind of pocket of Russia and in fact as a company was sold to Americans of course and it was under construction and it could be for months and it was sold and it was not efficient to transport oil through other means and it means that this was sold to a company again Russia from the U.S. which was better than Ukraine but afterwards with some kind of legal leaders of the U.S. where I when the U.S. was nationalized actually the Ukrainian government was able to buy it out and resell again in this case again the Polish-Polish company which is actually a state control company and what we have again like problem with supply of the U.S. to the factory and in fact it's a very good demonstration of how big power if you dismiss of course other means and if you could imagine as well Russian company I'm sure there will be no such problems I'm not 100% enthusiastic about this it doesn't solve all problems because in the case of World War II for example if you have a pudding which is completely crazy and then any kind of investment of course it doesn't but in most cases I guess it's very good and the cases for some also is kind of in this case Ok, Artush the media is in general and let's be practical what do you think about your country's foreign policy what do you like about it or would you change anything for that? Yeah I think the opinions are a little bit like one in very fast and I think that's good opinion but when I show my muscles once I'm in control it looks together with but actually this is kind of national not private but the most strong insight into the system is that I think that's one of the reasons why the resistance was even more active in the museum like in the stories but now I think very many people have grown but I think many tries to negotiate and act in every kind of orange or some kind of revolution like in Ukraine or try to negotiate in the case of Georgia I think this is completely wrong because I think it's very hard to get involved in the war and I think that's wrong but what I think is very good is just to tell the truth there is foreign policy on truth and for example now in Armenia they're only mentioning EU which is featuring EU negotiations with Russia on several grounds including Russia's good reactions including like to to to central those people who are important killings of some people and including some other and as you know all these states where those states who made some comments concerning this university and the World War II big national war as Russia was and when they said that the World War II didn't finish with the main man and then you know that we were so telling these these truths I think is very crucial and I think that many people have to understand if you go to major citizens in Russia means the streets of the city communist cities and you know communist cities are the Stalin as one of Russia and this one I'm writing in the neighborhoods of suspension I have a question to Jackson and Robert regarding the role of future what's going to happen next this is very unlikely in terms of the nation and it has to be about the convention he might to speak there or not how do you see this going forward in many years especially not that much until you present the revisions well because a lot of people yes they are dedicated and they're very active in local party organizations in Kansas in Texas in Oklahoma in Montana and in a few other states and they are causing plenty of trouble for the GOP so what they have is what the trust is is called the entrance stretch that is to enter a large organization that has some views with your home and you enter and organize inside and you try to improve in that way and that's what they're doing I mean even in San Francisco I had the amount of people are writing a whole slate of candidates for a county senate committee so I mean this is a long patient born from within I guess it's like in Great Britain on the left you have the military dependency and trust that which actually is called the Labor Party in the late 1980s so the late 1980s and so and I think well what on TV or the platform by over foreign policy right on the floor of the Republican National Convention we have delegates you know I think I think about 55 delegates to the you know National Convention and they can get out and they can speak and they can make motions and they go so it's a very but it's a long term thing I mean you have to build a national network of local organizations that do the verification in an educational work that needs to be done and you know I think a book that was number one in the United States so his book is being made by millions of people and it's being pushed and ideas rule the world so if they do and you have the best ones maybe we're doing it after all who knows in addition to that the long term it's a long term project and some of its succeeding are very good the majority of people who are involved in the day are pretty young teenagers 30s it's a huge majority in Europe as well so we can't say what's going to happen in Europe which is short term but we can say that's going to say these people are out of the system they're not going to go back in and they're staying out and they're doing that educational thing because they like to do it it's like what you do here you write about what you like and people learn from that maybe we'll check it 5 o'clock