 Well, good morning everybody. So I titled my presentation How To Profit From The Booming Litium Markets. It's a very, very succinct presentation. As I've expressed this morning, we are focusing on producing strictly litium hydroxide. So I warn you, I'm the president, I'm the founder. I'm very, very positive about this project. So I will be making forward-looking statements. All the numbers are subject to the 43101 2014 and updated 2016 feasibility study to be filed next week. So all the numbers are from that. So very, very rapidly what we are. We are a hard rock litium project based in the province of Quebec. We have developed over the course of the last seven years what is now recognized as the second largest and richest reserve of spa domain. Make the difference between reserve and resources. I know everybody here knows about it, but we still have to educate people. Fully permitted, finally got our permits back in September of 2015. So we're ready to build. We have decided back in 2011 that for the value of our shareholders would be better to, instead of only sending spa domain concentrate to the Chinese conversion facilities, would be a good idea to convert in Quebec, trying to get advantage of lower transport costs. While we were doing that, we realized that the world was evolving. The battery sector, lithium ion battery sectors was evolving and lithium hydroxide was going to become the lithium compound of choice with very, very little world capacity. So we said, okay, what advantage do we have in Quebec? Of course, first that pops of your mind is hydroelectricity, long-term affordable hydroelectricity contracts. So one and one made three. We decided to adapt a known, very long time known and proven technology electrolysis using the chloralkali industry. Contrary to our friends at NeoMetal, we decided to modify the front end of it to convert sulfate solution instead of a chloride solution. So that's why we have a property process on the feed material of the electrolysis. That allowed us to develop what is now the, would be the cleanest way of making lithium hydroxide or any lithium compounds. As a matter of fact, giving us a cost leading advantage over anybody else, including the brine producers. And like I said, it's going to be the cleanest way of making it. One of the interesting aspect I did not mention earlier in the advantage of our company is that we've decided back in 2013 to hire and keep in-house a full technical team. No mining engineer, no geologists, but chemists and process engineers so that we focus really on the value added on the conversion. So very, very rare would you see that in a junior company. Our business plan is very simple. We also, as a world beggar, as a junior, no money, you always want to find ways of reducing your risk and reducing your dilution, but advancing your project. We realized a couple of years ago that even once in full production, we still would need to qualify the products. And that usually takes between 12 and sometime up to 24 months once you're in full production. Well, when you think and you consider that it costs 5 to 7 million a month to run the mine, run the hydromet plant, that can be very expensive on top of the capex to build. So we decided one of the best approach was to build a phase one plant. By no means it's not a padded plant, it's a phase one plant. The smallest commercial size plant we could design using the same membrane electrolysis cells, the same square footage of membranes that are going to be installed in the large commercial plant. The idea is to be able to engage clients while we're building the commercial mine and plant with commercial representative samples so that we can shorten, we hope, the period from 12 to maybe 3 up to 6 months. So therefore, reducing by maybe 75 million to 100 million dollars, liquidity is required to really qualify your products. To do that, we decided that we would be building the phase one plant. The overall budget is $38 million, $25 million to build it, and two years of operation afterward. That was dictated by the initial request we made to Sustainable Development Technology Canada. Since it's a financial help that they gave us, they wanted to commercialize the technology, they wanted it to work for at least two years so that we prove to everybody that it works, and it can be commercialized. So that's why 25 to build 13 for the following two years of operation. We were able to finance this through obtaining $16 million of non-refundable grants, free money, no strings attached, $10 million of a private placement we just recently did with the Quebec government, and finally, like I mentioned this morning, we were able to secure an initial purchase order with Johnson-Matthew Battery Materials for goods and services in the amount of $12 million to be paid upfront. That closes the overall $38 million. We also were able to secure an initial long-term supply agreement with Johnson-Matthew for the commercial plant. Obviously, before putting their $12 million in, they definitively had a good thorough due diligence review, technical and economical, because it's very nice to be able to make lithium hydroxide, but it has to be economical, so they convince themselves and jump right in. So we are currently filing the full 43-101 next week. We will then start engaging discussions for the project financing that we hope to be able to put in place by the end of 2016 with a vision of being in production by mid-2018. You're going to say, Guy, it's very, very too tight. I'll explain to you why we will be able to achieve that. As a reminder, very rapidly, mine and concentrator, about 300 kilometers north of Chibougamou, three hours or 300 kilometers of truck, then 500 kilometers of rail to Chamonigan. So, immediately to Chamonigan, we add to update the feasibility study of 2014, because we changed the location where we will be building the commercial plant and the phase one plant. We were fortunate enough to be approached by the city of Chamonigan that wanted to, I would say, reuse or bring somebody in the recently closed paper mill facility in Chamonigan. So this is Photoshopped to show what buildings, existing buildings we're keeping, and here is where the existing buildings that we don't need are going to be demolished to the expense of the city. All the services that you need, we need 50 megawatt of electricity. So imagine directly hooked to the Hydro-Québec power dam, water source, obviously, the rail, that's on our land. So the rail out, the rail in, natural gas, everything that you need is there. One of the interesting aspects of Chamonigan also, we only paid, well, we will be over time paying $2 million for this, saves us about $20 million from what we were supposed to build to start with. But more important as a junior, it allows me to postpone a large project financing. It's impossible for me to go and build these two buildings without having the full project financing already in place. Here, because it exists, allows me to install immediately my phase one plant, allows me to keep the phase one plant up and running on the tooling services special dedicated line once the commercial plant is in operation. This is already stripped, already ready. We will start, Hydro-Québec is hooking that in a couple of weeks, but we already have access already starting to install the phase one plant, which should be up and running by the end of 2016. All of the paper machines in these two large buildings are going to be dismantled, well, they are being dismantled as we speak. It will be finished by end of January of 2017. So immediately in February I can start installing the equipment. So that's why I say it's an aggressive timeline, but it's made possible because the buildings are there and we have no problem with seasonability or financing ahead of the project. So rapidly, highlights of the feasibility. We can argue all day about the parameters. Are you okay with an exchange rate of 0.8? Are you okay with lithium hydroxide at 9,500 US lithium carbonate at 7? Listening to the panel this morning, I think I'm overly conservative. I should use double digit numbers. I think it's conservative. I think it's acceptable, but it makes good numbers. We still have 26 year mine life. We didn't change that. Payback 2.4 years. Net present value, $1.2 billion after tax, 30% IR. Still a capex around $550 million, $2.39 for the mine and concentrator, $3.10 for the Adromed Plan in Chauvinigan. But the real highlight of the feasibility study is the costs of the products. And I explained a little bit this morning, but I'll go in a little more details about the advantage we will always, always have over all of the lithium sector in China. Because as you heard, the lithium sector in China is fully dependent on importing raw material from Australia. So to start with the concentrate cost at the mine is about the same as the Aussie dollars in Australia. So the ton of concentrate that we mine would be similar. Where it's different, it's where it gets into the conversion facility. Our cost about 185 US. If you heard Anthony this morning is now talking about 600. My last numbers I have in the CIF China entering the conversion capacity is around $485. So imagine at 6 I would be even more happy. But you have to remember you have $300 advantage US. But it takes 7.5 tons of concentrate roughly to make one ton of the sum cabinet equivalent. So to start with, before you do any conversion, you have already $2,200 US minimum cost advantage that the Chinese will never, never be able to remove. So that gives us an advantage. The other advantage is that everybody else currently doing hydroxide is first making it some carbonate. We decided by using the electrolysis and then reconverting in an hydroxide, an added cost of about $1,000. We decided to go directly to hydroxide. So it cost our cost significantly. So just to tell you, if you go, this is provided by Roskill. It's the cash cost and overhead included, but cash costs in dark blue ear of making the semi-hydroxide combined technical and battery grades. Last year there was not more than 22% that was battery grade. So even with a combined cost, the recognized lowest cost of production of this some units SQM were still close to $500 cheaper than them. If we were to compete on the battery grade, we would definitively be at least $1,000 cheaper than the SQM. So there might be an oversupply in five or 10 years from now. But the question is, when there's an oversupply who gets thrown out, definitively not the lowest cost of production. That's interesting. And for sake of time, I won't go into much detail. Here you see the cost of carbonate. Again, you need to understand what kind of carbonate or what purity of carbonate. This ear again is combined technical and battery grades. You see from the Chinese, the Chenchi, the other Chinese, their costs. We have a very, very big margin of advantage over these. This was based on $430 U.S. CIF China for the spudgemane. I'm talking $485, Anthony was talking about $600 earlier. So even at $430, their cost of concentrate, we have a very, very big margin that they will not be able to reduce. But what's important to really assess from this, it's still technical and battery grades, which I'm carbonate. Because of the process, because of the use of membrane electrolysis, because we did put a lot of effort of reducing the level of impurities in the feed material. What we get out of the process is 99.99% spudgemane, which I'm carbonate. Just as an assessment, when battery grade spudgemane was selling for $5,000, $490 was selling for $13,000. A couple of weeks ago, somebody called me very desperately because he's using 99.99 low quantities, but nevertheless. So we never had supply agreement signed with anybody. Now he needs to purchase spud. So he was quoted a month and a half ago, $33,000 for his $49,000, when the battery grade was spud priced around $18,000. So you see, even if rapidly you think that we are higher cost than SQM and Albert Marl on their technical grade, we will always be lower than anybody else on the 99.9 to start with. So that's an interesting avenue. I didn't talk about the flexibility of our process, and we don't have the time to do that because of the schedule. But at will, we can adjust to either make hydroxide, monohydrate, or carbonate. So depending on how the market evolves and all the pricing and the needs of the market at a certain point, we have the flexibility with the process to address both. I won't go into the, because of the time, I don't go. So the conclusion, we're perfectly timed to enter the chain of supply. There is currently a shortage. It's going to increase the shortage. It's going to be terrible in my opinion for the next three, four years. And we're going to be one of the successful entering that. We have a permitted, there's only three permitted projects around the world. We're the only one that is not locked with anybody. And so that gives us another value added. We have a leading advantage over our peers. Oh, I didn't mention, but we have been all the way been supported by the Quebec government, different tax incentives, et cetera. But one point very important when we enter the discussion of the project financing is the newly relaunched plan R program in Quebec with a $1 billion special fund earmark to help develop natural resources north of the 49 parallel. We do qualify. They make direct equity investment in projects and or companies that are one single project that do qualify up to 20% of the CAPEX required to start the last 20%. But nevertheless, that's a, the last result as important as the first. So that sums up very rapidly. And I'm already seven minutes over my time. Sorry about this, Tracy. I'll take any questions. Thank you.