 where the market situation, current requirements and future developments have to be weighed carefully. And I'm sure many of you could testify from your own experience that the skills in public authorities very greatly, when it comes to the aspect of procurement, and many authorities have found themselves unintentionally locked into a preparatory technology for decades. And after a certain point, that original choice becomes so ingrained that alternatives risk being systematically ignored, no matter what the potential benefits could be. By the way, that is a waste of public money that most public bodies can no longer afford. They shouldn't afford at all, but nowadays they can't longer afford. And it's even worse when such decisions result in the waste of private money. And that happens where the public authorities' decisions force citizens to buy specific products rather than any product compliant with an applicable standard in order to make use of a public service. Come on, that could be your kids' school, it's close to all of us, insisting on the use of a specific word processor or it could be your tax departments' online forms requiring a specific web browser. And if you have other examples, concrete, please, you can share it. I don't hesitate to send them and that I can use as an argument that you can imagine. I want to make sure that guidance will be as practical as possible. Other colleague in here, I'm showing that it is really making a lot of collegial efforts, Vice President Zhevkovic and I myself, we want to put in place a new European interoperability framework as clear as that. And to be sure, the existing version of the European interoperability framework is not bad. It even sends out a list of characteristics of open standards within the context of cross-border e-government services. However, our work with Member States through the ISA program and its predecessors has made clear that there is an opportunity to further enhance interoperability between public administrations. And that second version of the EIF is foreseen to be adopted at the level of the College of Commissioners and will therefore rightly be perceived as a higher status and importance than the EIF version 1, both the framework and an interoperability framework.