 Ahmet Abdel-Toglu, former prime minister of Turkey. Thank you very much for being in WPC. You've just made a very interesting speech. But you mentioned the policy for which you were most famous, which was that Turkey should have friends with all the neighbors. It doesn't seem to be working at the moment. What has gone wrong and why? In fact, that principle was a basic principle to change the mindset of Turkish foreign policy. Because throughout decades, there was a misperception that Turkey surrounded by enemies. And at the beginning it was very successful because we had really workable counterparts. And in five, six years after 2002, when we came to power, we improved relations with all the neighboring countries and we established high-level strategic commission meetings between governments. But unfortunately, after Arab League, these several countries became fragile. And the existing countries were not able to run the real business in the country. For example, Syria. We had external relations and I personally worked very hard to have best relations with Syria and with Syrian leaders with Bashar Assad until 2011 when he started to attack civilians and later used chemical weapons against them. Now, who is your counterpart in Syria to have best relations is a question. Similarly, in Libya. The whole Arab Spring is destabilized. Yes, that was one of the reasons why you are not able to establish the best relations because you don't have a proper counterpart to have a proper dialogue to have good relations. Otherwise, even today, we had good relations with Ukraine, with Russia, with Georgia, with Azerbaijan, with Bulgaria, Greece. Still, we are keeping good relations. We are having problems only where the central government is not able to control the situation and you have to deal with it for your stability. You have to deal with the sub-national groups. I suppose difficult problem in the long term, medium to long term, following all this instability will be how to deal with the situation of the Kurds. Kurds for Iraq and Syria and obviously, of course, the Kurdish minority in Turkey. What sort of solution can you envisage? I think in the region, if we want to have regional peace, there should be respect to territorial integrity. Everybody must respect. And without having like Helsinki Act in 1974, in the region what we need is a great principle that all the territories will be protected. Otherwise, territories if start to be changed in one part of the region, that will have a domino effect. Therefore, Kurdish people living in the region should be having peace and stability in the respective countries. And in Turkey, throughout centuries, we lived all different ethnic and religious groups in Turkey and we have a democracy, so they can have all the rights and they have proper platform to raise the issues if they have. In Syria and Iraq, because of the Baas regimes and Arab nationalistic approach, Kurds have been denied. Like in Iraq, Kurds have been suffered. But it's not a mistake for Barzani to call the referendum. Barzani and KRG has been a good friend of Turkey during my term and afterwards and before because for the stability of our border with Iraq, KRG is an important partner. But he made a miscalculation. And because of that miscalculation, he lost several advantages. And even the stability of KRG has been affected. If he listened Turkish advice and other countries' advice and not go to referendum today, this situation for him would have been much better. But that should not be seen as an advantage for a sectarian or ethnic supremacy or hegemony of other groups as well. Kurds are one of the essential ethnicity in Iraq and Turkmen, Kurdish, Arab, all the people in Iraq, especially in Kirking, should be living in peace. And in Syria, we are not anything against Kurdish rights. In fact, in 2011, when I went to Bashar Assad in order to convince him not to use weapons against the civilians and for democratic reforms, one of the things we requested from him was to give identity card to Kurds living in Syria. So we were trying to defend Kurdish rights in Syria. But the problem is, existing Kurdish group in Syria, PYD, YPG, they are extension of PKK. And they are not even tolerant to other Kurdish groups, forget other ethnicities. Therefore, they had conflict with Barzani as well, pro-Barzani groups. Therefore, solution, if there is an issue of solution for Kurds in the region, Kurds should be living in peace in all the states in the region. And Turkey will be helping Kurds wherever they are, like other nations. Whenever they suffer anything like what happened in Aleppo, they escape to Turkey. And even during the issue of Kobani, they came to Turkey. When ISIS attacked Kurds in Kobani. But this should not mean that one terrorist group will be removed and another terrorist group, PKK, should be coming back. Indeed. Thank you very much. I think, as the Chinese say, we live in interesting times, which of course is the case in itself. Thank you very much, Mr. Tapatoglu. Thank you.