 Thank you so much. And then we'll take comments from our panelists, and we will begin with Dr. Wang, please. Well, there are a couple of questions for me. I'm not sure if I record all of them. But let me, I think one of the questions is about how to incorporate the measures of such a warbane to the existing, you know, system. So, I think, as we have said, as we have seen the New Zealand government and also UK governments has already started to collect its such kind of data. Actually, it's quite simple and not very difficult as we thought to capture people's happiness, because we have developed kinds of questionnaires for that. For example, OECD have published a guideline for measuring such a warbane. We can also follow UK governments practice. It's just a couple of questions we may just conduct those kind of surveys, individuals and households. So it's not not very difficult and not very costly to incorporate them into the existing question, you know, service. And actually, there are many international surveys, social surveys, economic surveys or labor surveys already includes those kind of questions. So the researchers and even several companies have done a lot of such kind of work, including Gallup. So I don't think it's quite difficult and challenging for the statistical agency to do such kind of job. Well, and some people also argue that we should, you know, measure the depression or the negative, you know, mental illness or those stuff. Well, yes, do that very important aspect of our life, but we should measure those negative, you know, emotions, and we should also capture the positive side, right, because our life, you know, have a lot of elements there. And as I briefly talked in my presentation, the subject well being includes both positive and negative aspect there. So we should just measure all of them. And it's actually not very difficult because we have quite a mature questionnaire to be used to do that like face to face or even on telephone or online service. It's not difficult, just we need to do something. Okay, thank you very much. Very good. Thank you, Dr. Wang. And final remarks from Mr. Suat, please. Thank you. I would like to highlight a conclusion from this meeting. Measurement is important for making good decisions and also for improving the budget allocation process. As Dr. Wang and Dr. Rosen have explained to us, well being must be measured from a more holistic perspective. New metrics, new index should inspire the way parliaments work and how we decide the destination of the money we take from taxpayers. As I explained, road is not wellness. Many rich countries are deeply in equal. So I think that well being more than economic road per se should be the main objective of the work of the parliaments around the world. Because what is not measured cannot be improved. I want to insist that, but also the political priority that has no money is not a priority. We can repeat that the gender agenda is important, but if we do not allocate money and make better public policies, it's only speeches. The budget allocation process does not begin when the executive branch submits his annual projects. It's a permanent process that begins with accountability. Parliaments can influence the budget in the work of the committees and in the everyday work. We are evaluating permanently public policies. Better accountability improves the efficiency of budgets and public policies. And that's a very important part of the parliamentary process. So COVID has forced us to think outside the box, out of the box. And I think we will have to find new solutions for the economic and social effects of COVID. And that can start by seeing and measuring ourselves differently. Thank you for your attention and greetings for all. Thank you very much, Mr. Suat. And final remarks from Dr. Russell. I'm so grateful for you staying awake and being here with us in the middle of the night. A lot of questions were directed to you, so please. Thank you very much. I'm just going to do those two specific questions from the chat. First of all, has the public finance bill been amended since it was passed? The answer is no, it was only passed in February this year. So we haven't had a chance to get to it yet to change it at all. So nothing has changed there. The second question was around the methodology as to how we're measuring well-being and whether or not it's available to be shared. Some of it is stuff that people would be able to collect themselves anyway. Things like voter turnout in elections and so on. So different countries would have their own ways of developing those stats. I think what's a little bit different about what we're doing is rather than just trying to have a measure of people's subjective well-being, we are trying to develop a series of measures that have a little more objectivity to them, like the number of people in New Zealand who speak Turiyomari. The critical thing, of course, is how that actually relates to well-being. Now, our understanding is that in New Zealand we do think that more people speaking Turiyomari does enhance well-being. But there's an empirical question there as to whether or not it does. So I actually think we need both sets of measures, the holistic subjective account of well-being, but also some of those objective measures as well. In terms of being available to other countries, I just don't know. A lot of those stats are being collected by our Department of Statistics and actually a whole lot of the measures are under development. We don't think we've got them right yet and it'll take development. However, I can find that out just with an election coming up. It's a little bit hard to get to people at the moment. Just a few final remarks. I was really, first of all, I was delighted to be speaking with my colleagues around the world. That's an extraordinary thing that has come out of this wretched pandemic is our capacity to use technology like this to connect around the world. And I've been really delighted to hear from people from Rwanda and Iceland. And, you know, when I'm stuck down at the bottom of the Pacific, so that's just been marvellous. It's certainly enhanced my well-being. I was really interested to hear what is happening in Iceland. And I'll be digging around on the internet and follow up and just understand how that compares to what we've done here in New Zealand. I know immediately we talk about social, economic and environmental well-being, but we also, in New Zealand, we also talk about cultural well-being. It's because we have a very quite a diverse nation. We speak about 180 different languages spoken in the country. And I'm not sure how many ethnicities are represented here, but because we're an immigrant nation, we have huge diversity here. So that cultural aspect might be more important here than in some countries which are more homogenous, but I don't know. A number of people raised gender issues. And someone wanted to know how women and children are included in our well-being budget. Again, there are specific measures sitting in our dashboards around women and children. So we can look at those measures there. In terms of what we're actually doing within our budgets, we have a focus on child poverty. We have a Child Poverty Reduction Act where governments are required to report on the extent to which child poverty has reduced year on year. We have to really focus on that child poverty. And in the first well-being budget and in the second one, we also have a big set of work that's being done across government departments on family violence and on reducing family violence. New Zealand has a shameful record in that regard. One of the worst in the world actually, which is really disgraceful. So we've got some serious work going on there to try to reduce that. And other people raised the issue of the gendered response to COVID. And you're right. One of our big approaches to COVID here in the budget is what we call shovel-ready projects. Basically, they're big construction projects, which can be rolled out quite quickly and employ people quickly and get money circulating around our economy quickly. Of course, because they're construction projects, they tend to be oriented towards male employees. And a number of organisations here have raised the issue that they don't cater well for women. And we've been talking about the need to not just fund our physical infrastructure, but to fund our social infrastructure as well around our non-government organisations, which are typically staffed by women. And yet they provide a lot of the support in our communities. So I just really liked Tatoko, which means to support those words when people talked about a gendered response to COVID. And there was one further issue which was raised, which I just will have to really think about. So thank you to the people who raised it. And that was really comparing what was happening in poorer countries compared to what is happening in wealthier countries. And of course, New Zealand is a pretty wealthy country on the world scale. And again, we're so removed from the rest of the world. Sometimes it's hard to understand the nature of what's going on in other countries. So thank you for raising that issue. I think in a globally connected world, I'm not sure that we can genuinely achieve wellbeing unless we achieve it for all of us. So I think it is incumbent on wealthier countries to actually be very proactive in what we can do with respect to ensuring that all of us are able to achieve wellbeing. So thank you, Tatoko, and thank you for having me this evening. Thank you very much, Dr Russell. What a pleasure and some very specific steps there that people can look at. So thank you indeed. Now Professor Sax has joined us and is going to give us some final remarks and also kind of summing up now the four webinars that we've had. And these sort of experience from that. So please Professor Sax. Well, hello to everybody around the world. Thank you for a wonderful session and thank you for your leadership and all your inspiring work. I'm personally very gratified by these sessions that we've been having online. And the first order of business for me is to propose that we continue them in 2021. I think it is actually necessary for parliamentarians around the world to be in regular contact with each other. And it just doesn't make sense to do it only by physical travel when we have the means to do it routinely now. We need to be informed of what's happening around the world. We need to be sharing best practices. We need from the perspective of my country I need to be sharing worst practices. We have the worst government we've ever had. I just want to say to the whole world don't do what we're doing in the United States. We've got it completely upside down here but we're trying to take care of that in November. We need to be learning from each other. This is absolutely essential. This is an interconnected world. The pathogens move fast. The money moves fast. The good ideas can move fast. The bad ideas unfortunately also move fast. So we need to stick together. And I want to say that the Sustainable Development Solutions Network which was convened by the United Nations Secretary General eight years ago now is ready to participate and with the great leadership that Kirsten and Gabriella have provided. I very much hope we continue. Second, let me indicate that in my capacity as a chair of the Lancet COVID Commission we'll be issuing a statement on the occasion of the UN General Assembly about responding to the COVID pandemic. Let me say that New Zealand's response has been absolutely extraordinary and exemplary and that is one of the best practices that we need to share with the whole world. Our message is this is a suppressible virus. It can be contained but it requires a good and humane and transparent and science-based leadership like Prime Minister Arthurn has provided and this is what we need everywhere in the world. Our statement contains a lot of information and I'll ask IPU and Kirsten to share it with all of you. It will be published on September 15 on the opening day of the General Assembly. On the question of well-being which was so ably discussed today let me personally stress the importance of both subjective and objective measures of well-being. As Shunwang, my colleague in the World Happiness Report knows every year we're publishing rankings based on Gallup survey data of subjective well-being. This is extremely insightful data. It tells you how people feel about their lives. That is not just to be dismissed. That's how people are living their lives. And by the way when they're unhappy they'll tell you and when they're happy they'll tell you and you will learn a lot. And so we already have the rankings for more than 150 countries each year and we have better and better data coming but use the subjective data as well as the objective data. Use the sustainable development goals also as a framework. There's a strong correlation between achieving the SDGs and ranking high on happiness. This was one of our chapters in this year's report. And it's not for nothing because the SDGs are about doing good things. Universal access to basic needs, gender equality, reducing inequalities in society, protecting the environment. They all contribute to well-being. And so use the SDG framework and we also have the annual SDG index to help on that. There was a discussion about mental health and depression. This is extremely important as our colleague in the World Happiness Report, co-editor and co-founder of the report, Lord Richard Layard has been stressing for 20 years or more. The single biggest cause of unhappiness in the world by far is clinical depression. And this is a treatable condition. This is an illness and it can be treated. People need help and there are known effective treatments. And this can also be treated also with online help. So even in the midst of the pandemic which is absolutely exacerbating mental health challenges and problems and depression in particular, we need an effective response. So I think we have heard a lot of these best practices. We will try to call from this fantastically rich discussion today some of this to share with you. And I look forward, Kirsten, to our continuing this journey. I'd like for all of the parliamentarians, bring your friends, bring your colleagues, same party across the aisle, different parties, bring them to this global online discussion. I can tell you, especially in countries ruled by presidents, we need parliamentarians, we need representatives, not just these people like Trump strutting on the stage, we need people who are close to their constituencies that are representing the people that need to be heard and need to be very well informed. So let me close by thanking all of you for the invaluable work you do in representing humanity and your own constituencies. And Kirsten, thank you so much for co-leading this adventure with Gabriella and I look forward to a lot more and a new, richer of activities together. Thank you, Professor Sacks. And I think that's the perfect way to end today's session and the series of webinars. And I think we can already say, Professor Sacks, we will be back. And we will be in touch with everyone who participated in each and every one of the webinars with more information on how we will do that. So again, thank you all for joining. It's been a pleasure and please don't hesitate to reach out to any of the organizers with any questions or any requests for the future webinars. Thank you, everyone.