 Yn ymddi'r gweithio, Ywan LaPassar, yw'r cyfnodau cyfnodau, fel y cyfnodau ar y cyfnodau cyfnodau yng nghymru, Andrews Ansep. Ywan yw'r cyfnodau ar y cyfnodau ar y cyfnodau cyfnodau yn y EU. Yn ymddi'r cyfnodau yn ystoniol i'r eu fferfau Europea, ac mae'n eu gweithio i'r Prifysgol i'r Prifysgol yw'r 5 ymddi. Yw'r cyfnodau yn ymddi'r cyfnodau yn Gwyllgor Europea i'r prifysgol, i'r prifysgol yw'r prifysgol i gweithio i'r prifysgol yn ymddangos cyfnodau i'r prifysgol i'r prifysgol i'r prifysgol. Ywan, yna'n ei bod yn rhywbethu'n rhoi. pubrwy'n ei drwsio'n ddod? E werthin, yn ddod? Yn gweithio rywbeth rydyn ni, yw'r cyffnodau yn y cyfnodau yw'r cyfnodau ar y gyffnodau. Un iddyn nhw'n meddwl yn ei wneud i'r cyfwyrfod lleol, yn gallu'n ffordd y cyfwyrd yn fathau'r rhannu i'r fathau ymlaenol eich eu ddweud, y ddwyllfa'r ddweud, y ddweud, y ddweud, y ddweud, y ddweud, ond mae o'r ddweud yn y dyfodol. Mae'n ffordd yn y dyfodol i ddweud, ac mae roedd y bwysig fwy respau i gaelol yma. Rwy'n meddwl am ddechrau dweud y maen nhog iddyn nhw, ond sydd wedi gweithio atrath i'r hubanc.Roedd hynny i ni'n gweld. Roedd y maen nhw yn oed yn ysgolion beth hon i ysgolwch gael o'r maen nhog hwn. Ysgolwch gydaír maen nhog hwn sefydlu yn gyfynnig o atlanticosion, a dyna'r rhaid i gael drwsio beth o hollu yna, have to travel far away etc in the digital world this should not be the case but unfortunately it is so that the 16 initiatives that received service are outlined the main aim is to make sure the barriers they have emerged that we managed to demolish them but we do that ac ydych chi'n bwysig i'ch gweithio am ymlaen nhw, ond ydych chi'n ffordd yma yw wneud os yw rym ni'n bwysig i gweithio i'r mawr a'r cyfeiriau. Mae'n meddwl y gallwn yn ei ddweud yn fawr. Felly, yn ffordd am yma fyddwch i'ch gweithio i'ch cynnig ym mlynedd o'r unrhyw gwirioneddau, rydyn ni'n mynd i ddweud i'ch gweithio i'ch gweithio i'r y three issues that we still haven't tackled, but we will do that in this autumn. So I will spill the beans a bit with you. Firstly, it's the issue of data. Now, as with goods, capital and services, data within the context of the single market should move freely and securely. Actually, in reality, data is sometimes also connected with the free flow of goods and services and capital. So if we don't have the free flow of data, the free flow of capital goods and services is also hampered. And that is one of the reasons why we look into this. Next year, Europe will have a new general data protection regulation. It's a great piece which deals with the fragmentation issue. I mean, how to make sure that there is a clear uniform standard of protecting private data throughout Europe, wherever your data is located, it doesn't matter, it's protected in the same manner. But the GDPR only deals with personal data. It does not deal with non-personal data like business data or data generated by machines, for example. So what happens with this? And there is what we've seen in Europe is that there is an emergence of data localisation measures that have been taken by national or local governments. And these measures, though they are mainly designed to protect personal data, they actually affect non-personal data as well. And by this, they also fragmentise the single market. Now, we need to tackle this. And this autumn, the Commission will propose a measure which will make sure that data, in most cases, when it comes to non-personal data, should be able to flow freely. There should not be mandatory restrictions of data in any given member states territory unless there is good national security grounds to do so. Of course, there are other issues that are concerned with this as well. I mean, for example, cloud switch. I mean, there are very many cloud service providers, how it's possible to switch services. And there, of course, the issue of whether we should give a, let's say, a switching right or whether we should make sure that the conditions that everybody signs up to are transparent enough so that people in the end of the day can choose themselves how to better manage their data. These issues we will tackle probably in a manner that does not affect too much the contractual freedoms of the different parties because that is also very important. Or there is an issue of, OK, if the taxation data of a German company that makes business in Ireland is actually located in France, how then the Irish tax authority, for example, can have access to this data. I mean, this is also important in the context of the free flow so that there is an access right of public authorities in case they have legitimate interest to go after this data. Or security of data as well. I mean, OK, I told that personal data, the security of personal data is guaranteed throughout Europe starting from May next year. What about non-person data? Again, the taxation data, for example. We need to make sure that the basic infrastructure is secure enough so that the data can flow freely. But it is important to tackle it. Not only because it will open up opportunities for businesses. The data, the size of the data economy in Europe last year was 60 billion. And it's predicted that if we tackle these measures, it can go to 739 billion by 2020. So there is an enormous potential which we should grasp. The other issue which I would like to mention is the cyber security. I think when the free flow of data deals with the freedom side of the internal market, the cyber security aspect deals with more how to make sure that the general environment is secure just worthy. It is a very important one. Firstly, how to protect our critical infrastructure. There is a nice directive already in Europe which is called the Network Information Security Directive. It should be implemented again quite soon. But that's not nearly enough. There is an emergence of Internet of Things. How can we make sure that these products that are placed in the market or the services that are promoted in the market, that they are cyber secure? So what we will do is that we will put a European certification framework that will rely on national certification frameworks so that in the future, if a product is placed in the market, we can be assured that it's also a cyber secure product. There is also, I think it was just last spring, there were two waves of major cross-border cyber attacks. They were global in nature of course. But the issue arises, how does Europe respond to these attacks? Clearly, cyber security in reality is a national domain. Member states should protect it. But there is a clear scope for corporations as well because as I told in the beginning, digital domain is in essence a global domain and it cannot be contained within national borders. So member states need to cooperate on these matters and there is scope for improving the operational cooperation between member states in terms of response to crisis. The third dimension I want to highlight is the platform economy. Again, quite a new economic phenomenon, a bit more than a decade old, a very vibrant and very dynamic one. So it's clear that one must tread very carefully in terms of whether to put any rigid rules in place. But there are issues already that we have seen which have emerged like the issue of harmful or illegal content and the profiliation of this content in internet platforms. How to deal with it? Platforms themselves have been also quite proactive on some of these issues. But again, within the context of the single market, we need to make sure that there are general frameworks in place so that in all different jurisdictions in the single market, platforms can operate uniformly. That does not mean that in Europe we should start to harmonise what are sensitive issues or what are delicate issues in different societies. Europe is still a combination of 28 sovereign member states, more than 28 different, very vibrant and very diverse societies. And it is up to these societies themselves to find the right balance of what is harmful, what is not harmful, but that doesn't mean that there shouldn't be rules in place that platforms should tackle with harmful content once it's notified that there is a counter-notice procedure that if I, for example, feel that something that has been removed by the platform that I have posted and that is not actually in my mind harmful, that I have right to complain somewhere and this complaint is taken seriously up, et cetera. And then there is the other side of it, which is the issue of business practices in the platform economy, in business-to-business relationships, big platforms and little players. And whether we should look at the contractual terms and whether there are issues of imbalances that have emerged in this, we launched a public consultation early this year and the first results of this public consultation indicate that indeed there might be issues that needs to be tackled. So these are the three areas that we still haven't yet completed and where the Commission will early autumn propose measures. But the majority of the actions have already put on the table of the co-legislators and it's really up to the Member States and the European Parliament to agree upon them. And it's important that they do it so rapidly because in the end of the day it's the issue of whether if an Irishman goes and has a vacation in Spain, that he or she can port the Netflix and that he or she is used to watch it in Ireland to Spain or to watch the Mayfair and Conor match in a nice Spanish speech. So I mean these little things that give people more freedoms in the digital era I think that they are very important and they should not be neglected. But we rely on the Australian Presidency of course to push this agenda forward together with the forthcoming Hungarian presidency and we are quite optimistic that by the end of the mandate of this Commission all the measures that are necessary for this rapid development of the digital single market are in place and they can be implemented and then of course enjoyed by the general public. Thank you.