 Felly o'r ffordd y dylai'r rhaglen gyda'r sydd ar gyda nhw, dwi'n meddwl rhaid i weld yn ni'n teimlo ddarwar i nifer o unrhyw deilio cys ei edgesau, dwi'n meddwl gynnwys hefyd. Roedden ni'n mynd ymddangos o'r besodyniad i'r rhaglen i'r gwahanol i Paerys, gyda ni rhaid o'r ei meddwl ar tuti, a'u ei roedd trei, i'r styn ni. Brwynt iawn gweld i gennych, gallwn mawr rhaid yna, os ydych chi'n meddwl mewn hwnnw, ymgorodwch ar ddigwelio nhw'n 30% o'r gol yn y parysig. Be gael y cymdeithasol yn ymgyrchol gael ôl a'r gol yn ymgyrchol. Mae'r gael ymgyrchol yn ymgyrchol, a'r gwerthio'n dylunio'n gydag yn gwneud yn gweithio'r gweithio'r gwahanol. Mae'n gyfodd yw'r amgylcheddau hynny mwy yn gŷnol, yn ffac 60% of ratify nations have committed to the protection and restoration of ecosystems in general and forest in particular. The other thing that I'm very encouraged by is the presence and the prominence of the indigenous voice here at COP. Take Amazonia for example. I went to a session yesterday on the role of Amazonian indigenous people in the NDCs. Amazonia, if we lose Amazonia, so important is that forest in the regulation of global climate and as a source of resilience with all its genetic diversity, that if we lose it then we basically lost the battle against climate change. But the very interesting thing about Amazonia is that 30% of it occurs within indigenous people's territories and rates of deforestation are a border of magnitude slower inside these territories than outside. So we really want to talk about ambition in terms of the Paris Agreement. We really do need to make sure that these people, these communities are heavily involved in the design and not only the implementation of climate policy. So overall I'd say there's definitely here in the Bond Zone at least, the idea that to deliver on Paris is going to take nothing short of a global transformation in the economic system so that our economy is built not on the destruction of the natural environment, but on careful stewardship of the natural world. Now this is a message that's been loudly trumpeted here, but many might argue that the Bond Zone is an echo chamber and what's really important is what's going on over there in the bullet zone and in the negotiating rooms. The answer I'm getting is that on the issues of nature-based solutions, on the importance of nature-based solutions to climate change, mitigation and adaptation there's largely silence over there and that really needs to be addressed moving forward. So tomorrow I'll be speaking in two events, one at noon which is an event hosted as part of the Biodiversity and Climate Change series. This is a lecture series that's been running all week which is hosted by the University of the UN and it's part organised under the Friends of EBA which is part of the NIUCN initiative. I'll be talking then about quality and standards of criteria for including conservation and nature-based solutions and ecosystem-based adaptation in the National Determine Contributions. In the afternoon I'll be speaking with a variety of people on the topic of nature-based solutions and their prominence in the NDCs and I need to move forward in terms of raising the bar in terms of targets and how we measure success towards a global adaptation goal.