 There are still countries that do not use the full range of demand reduction programs, and I would like to ask, is there any way how UNODC can promote, for example, substitution treatment in those countries where these programs are not implemented? That is an issue which needs to be treated professionally based on scientific and medical analysis and should not be politicized. Only this way we can achieve some objective. And in cases, as you mentioned, when in some countries they are not in a position to provide adequate treatment to people who are addicted to different kind of drugs, of course our role is UNODC to develop the programs which could help them to develop their own skills, to develop their own national capacities, but the ownership remains with the member state. That is the crucial point. Would you expect something more from Mr. Fedotov as the new head of UNODC and as a Russian to do more to promote substitution treatment in Russia especially? I think that puts Mr. Fedotov in a really difficult position because for any of the heads of these agencies to single out particular countries is very difficult. But there are ways to deal with this. I mean, you can point to the region as one of the places where the HIV epidemic is still growing and it's growing in relation to UNODC's mandate, which is injecting drug use. And in that way it has to be dealt with. In that way he can stand alongside Michelle Siddibe, the head of UNAIDS. He can stand alongside the heads of other UN agencies and just be very, very clear that this is not something that should be optional for member states. This is something that has to be done as an obligation if we're going to really meet the Millennium Development Goals, if we're going to really begin to halt and reverse the spread of HIV. There's no getting around that. It has to be said forcefully and it has to be said directly. Some experts say that actually it would be also more effective to lay more emphasis on treating the demand side in Russia and introduce new methods to treat the demand side. For example, opiate substitution programs. We are, of course, studying this experience and I can say, or I can say, or I can say, we are pushing back on the experience of the United States of America. That is, we see that these results are clinically unconfirmed, some kind of positive. In comparison with other forms of drug treatment, it generally performs better. So the notion that the United States is abandoning methadone or doesn't support methadone or is finding methadone doesn't work is just ludicrous. You cannot go to a U.S. government drug-related website and not find positive mentions of methadone. You will find the links to the studies. So I suggest that Mr. Ivanov go to the Cochrane Collaboration and read what they have written about methadone or that they go to the NIDA webpage in the U.S. or even to the Office of National Drug Control Policy in the U.S., all of which are firmly in favor of methadone. In fact, the only critical problem we have with methadone in the United States, which is acknowledged by all these organizations, is we don't have enough. The problem is that, unfortunately, drug users don't stand in line and don't hurry to get treatment. Yes, drug users are not staying in line for the government treatment programs and rehabilitation programs, but maybe the question must be why they are not doing this. Maybe they are not in favor of such programs and they need again something else. There must be other opportunities for them. For example, substitution therapy. Russia is not using the most effective medications or the most effective approach to dealing with their drug problems. Now, UNODC is kind of a repository of good science. It collects information from around the world. It promotes best practice. UNODC should be promoting best practice. And this is best practice. They should be promoting it to Russia. Obviously, they can't dictate what a country does in its national programming to address drug problems. They can't dictate that. But it can certainly use its influence and knowledge to suggest, yes, you should be doing this.