 But, while extolling the virtues of democracy, may I say it ironically that India, India is perhaps is a good contributor of child labor say compared to China which is not a democracy. Is it not ironic sir? It is an irony definitely, definitely. But, when I was just answering the previous question, I said that it is not the democracy in the governance. It is not only a kind of ritual democracy through elections and some people reach in the power, good or bad, all kind of people. So, that is a kind of very ritual democracy, very conventional democracy. So, under the garb of democracy many things happen. But, I am talking about the culture of democracy where everybody can raise the voice and can feel responsible to each other. Democracy brings about transparency in the society. But, that is hardly seen even in the political outfits and systems. Even in the social organizations, NGOs, you can hardly see those kind of things. So, that is why I am emphasizing on the culture of democracy. Sir, you during your earlier discussions, you referred to do obliquely about the fundamentalism and like things. Sir, in this child labor, this prohibition and regulation act 1986 which has been recently amended perhaps cabinet has approved and you have raised certain objections regarding the list of hazardous occupations. So, while you talked about fundamentalism, in the child labor concept, when someone is I mean I mean impeded in his growth in the mental and physical growth, that is one way the attributes of child labor. So, here when this fundamentalism, we talk about these occupations, 18 occupations and then 55 processes. Just a fleeting thought sir, can it also be the concept of child labor, whether this indoctrination of the child, like what is done in the he has just referred to Iraq in other countries. We have seen child jihadis, this kind of thing in the other end also there might be in the left in the leftist world also that may happen that indoctrination of the child, when he or she is able to understand the political philosophy is not able. Is it also can be construed as child labor? Let me underline one thing that childhood freedom is the philosophy of my life. It is an ideology, it is my religion, it is my culture, it is my mission, childhood freedom. Every child is born as free child. Every child on the earth is born with certain human dignity, because when a child is born, it is established that God is kind to us. And I always say that when a girl is born, when a daughter is born, the God smiles and says that I wanted to continue humanity, the mankind, humankind. So, children are most precious. It is not just for talk shop in our way of life, we have to respect the childhood. Having said that, when it comes to some of those discussions, debates about the legal systems, I tell you that when I started India did not have any law in 1981. So, it took me about me and many people, I will not take all the credit for that, several individuals organizations, we work very closely. But I brought this issue that India should have a domestic law against child labor. In 1986, the law was enacted. It took us about six years. I remember that I was organizing sit-ins and dharnas and slogans with my wife Sumedha and my two, three-year-old son. And later on, my daughter was born in 1985. So, we were being arrested by the police and thrown away from there with one simple demand that India is the largest democracy in the world and it should have a long and child labor. When so many judgments and orders have been passed by the Supreme Court of India, India should have its own law. You referred the number of laws, but these laws were not implemented. Also, there was no single law. So, finally, in 1986, the law was enacted. That was a weak law. That was a poor law. We have never been satisfied. But it took us almost three decades for the amendment of this law. I have been doing every possible thing in terms of writing letters to every single parliament member, every single parliament member, not once, but several times. I have personally met almost three, four hundred parliament members one-to-one as I was talking to you, convincing them, trying to tell them that we cannot get rid of many problems in my country until and unless child labor is totally eliminated, totally eradicated. Some of them slowly agreed. Finally, the amendment is proposed and the amendment is now cleared by the cabinet. There are several interesting and progressive things. One is that all forms of child labor is prohibited up to the age of 14. Earlier, only the hazardous forms of child labor were prohibited. That is one good step. The second good step that all hazardous forms of child labor is banned legally between the age of 15 and 18. That is also very progressive development. Now, child labor is a cognizable offense. So, police has to act on it. It does not remain confined to the hands of labor department and labor inspectors. Now, police has to. The punishment is much more deterrent than before. The fines is much more bigger. These things are positive, but there is gray area which we are trying to address. I have written a letter to the prime minister of India. I have spoken to and written to the labor minister and met him and spoke to him and also many other ministers. So, we are asking for two simple things. One is the child labor should be properly defined in the law. For many people, it would be surprising that this law of 1986 is on child labor, but there was no definition of child labor in the law as per saying. And so is the new case. Child labor is not defined. What is child labor? Rest of the things are there, but what child labor is when the title of the laws on child labor or about child labor. So, that is a serious gap. In one of Bachman, Bachao, Zandolan petitions, the High Court of Delhi has defined child labor last year in November 2014. So, that they have defined child labor clearly, established the chances of exploitation or employee-employee relationship directly or indirectly and so on. Anyway, so I have demanded that there should be clear definition of child labor. So, there is no ambiguity which was there in 86 law and which is there in the new suggested amendment. The second thing is about the hazardous forms of child labor. There are 18 occupations and 65 processes. They gradually added when different medical committees and technical experts and committees have found that there are many things which are hazardous for the health of children. So, they have added to it. So, now we have this list, the list of prohibitive occupations and processes. I am demanding that it should not be compromised. There should not be any change in it at this stage. That should be the primary basis of defining the hazardous child labor so that the children would not be allowed to work at any age, at any place and there should be some sort of provision for improvisation of this list so that sometimes the new occupations come. They could also be added to it and so on. So, definition of child labor one and clarity about the hazardous occupations because this has been established after thorough and intense research and investigations and reports and surveys and so on. So, we cannot make compromise on the hazardous list which is prohibited in the present law. So, it should continue in the next law, the next amendment as well and that is something which is very much needed to ensure that children must not be exploited and would not be forced to work in conditions which are not good for their physical and mental health, that is not good for their education. Globally, child labor is prohibited in many such things but when the children are learning something in the families and helping the families in their free time, not at the cost of their health, not in any kind of hazardous situations and occupations, not under any compulsion or force, not indirectly engaged by their parents or family members who are working as subcontractors for a contractor because that is indirect child labor. These things are not allowed in most countries but learning and helping the families is something which is common everywhere in the world. So, we should not try to mix these two things, we have to clarify it that the children must not be forced to work in any conditions, they must complete good quality education, good quality education for all children that is must. There must not be any kind of excuse for that, poverty is no excuse I would say or any kind of those things are no excuse. All children must be ensured their fullest childhood, education, healthcare, nutrition and all rights which are ensured in our constitution as well as in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and there are many other conventions and treaties which India is party to.